WAQP Week 6 Assignment

profileMs90
WK5Assgn_2_Keys_T.doc

PhD Prospectus Form

Students | Complete your doctoral prospectus within this form. Write your responses in the white spaces using a scholarly tone and include in-text citations and APA reference entries, where appropriate. You can click on underlined terms and headings for descriptions, resource links, and examples located in the Appendix. For additional prospectus information and resources, refer to the Doctoral Research Coach. Complete the Research Design Alignment Table within this form using the information from earlier sections and self-assess your research design alignment. Submit this completed form into MyDR for formal evaluation and feedback when your committee chair indicates that you are ready to do so.

Student’s Name | Turissa Alisha Keys Student ID | A01194468

Program and Specialization * | Click or tap here to enter text. Submission Date | 6/28/2026

*Remember that your study focus must be within the realm of your program and specialization area.

Evaluators Only | Complete this section and provide feedback on responses and rubric scores in the form where noted.

Committee Chairperson Name: Dr. Leggie L. Boone Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Second Committee Member Name: Dr. Sandra Caramela-Miller Overall Assessment: Choose score.

PhD Program Director: Dr. Jessie Lee Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Rubric Standard | Complete > Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Refer to the annotated outline to see the required parts of the Dissertation Prospectus document.

Note. Please complete following the directions provided, using the stem sentences, and referring to the examples in the appendix.

Title

Provide a concise (aim for 15 words or fewer) working title for this study. Include the main topic, variables/concepts under investigation, and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words.

Racial/Ethnic Minority Adults’ Experiences with Barriers to Mental Health Care Access and Utilization

Supporting Literature

The first step in developing your prospectus is to search the literature related to the general area you want to investigate (see social problem below). In your review of recent, empirical literature, what keywords did you search and in what databases?

The keywords and databases searched included The key words searched and the databases used included racial/ethnic disparities, mental health care access, mental health service utilization, structural barriers, cultural barriers, technological barriers, African American OR Black, Hispanic OR Latino, Asian American, combined with Boolean operators (AND/OR) mental health treatment disparities. Only articles published between 2021 and 2026 that were peer reviewed and empirical were included. PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Web of Science and CINAHL were the main databases used for searches. Other searches were made in multi-disciplinary databases, including SAGE Journals and the JSTOR, to find social science views.

Provide at least 10 brief summaries of recent, scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles that support/justify a current and relevant problem in your discipline or professional field. Source(s) supporting your framework should be included. Include the complete, APA reference entry, followed by (a) an in-text citation; (b) what was studied; (c) what was found; and (d) why this research is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem.

Breslau, J., Han, B., Levin, J. S., Lai, J., & Yu, H. (2024). Are disparities in mental health care for Medicaid beneficiaries lower in managed care? Healthcare, 12(1), 100734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2024.100734

(a) Breslau et al. (2024); (b) used Medicaid claims data to evaluate the trends of racial/ethnic disparities in mental health service use; (c) identified large and persistent disparities among Black and Hispanic beneficiaries despite insurance coverage, highlighting structural and cultural barriers; (d) relevant to my study because they found that disparities in mental health care access persist despite insurance coverage, which emphasizes structural and cultural barriers.

Cook, B. L., Rastegar, J., & Patel, N. (2024). Social risk factors and racial and ethnic disparities in health care resource utilization among Medicare advantage beneficiaries with psychiatric disorders.  Medical Care Research and Review81(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231222583

(a) Cook et al. (2024); (b) This study examined the intersection of social risk factors (e.g., housing instability, food insecurity) and racial/ethnic disparities in mental health service utilization using large-scale claims and survey data; (c) found that even after accounting for social risks, Black and Hispanic adults had significantly lower utilization rates than White adults; (d) this research is important to my study because it highlights how structural social determinants compound racial/ethnic disparities, supporting the need to examine multifaceted barriers.

Elliott, T. R., Choi, K. R., Elmore, J. G., & Dudovitz, R. (2024). Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of pediatric mental health care.  Academic Pediatrics24(6), 987-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.01.024

(a) Elliott et al. (2024); (b) This study examined racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of mental health services among a nationally representative sample of U.S. children aged 5 to 17 years using data from the National Health Interview Survey; (c) found that Black and Hispanic children were significantly less likely to receive mental health treatment compared to White children, even after controlling for socioeconomic and health-related factors; (d) this research is important to my study because it demonstrates the persistence of racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric mental health care access, thereby supporting the need for qualitative exploration of the structural, cultural, and technological barriers experienced by racial and ethnic minority populations across age groups.

Green, J. G., McLaughlin, K. A., Fillbrunn, M., Fukuda, M., Jackson, J. S., Kessler, R. C., Sadikova, E., Sampson, N. A., Vilsaint, C., Williams, D. R., Cruz-Gonzalez, M., & Alegría, M. (2020). Barriers to mental health service use and predictors of treatment drop out: Racial/Ethnic variation in a population-based study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(4), 606-616.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01021-6

(a) Green et al. (2020) b) Studied nationally representative survey data from the United States related to adults with mental illnesses and explored the factors of perceived need, barriers to treatment and dropout; c) Discovered that racial and ethnic minorities had lower chances of recognizing their need for treatment or accessing services and higher rates of dropout in comparison to white adults, with different kinds of barriers involved (structural, attitudinal, cultural, etc.); d) Relevant to my paper since it presents information about structural, cultural and other barriers causing disparities in mental healthcare utilization by racial and ethnic minorities.

Koroma, M. I., Inungu, J. N., Adu-Serwaah, M., Sultana, S., Younis, M. Z., & Iheduru-Anderson, K. (2025). Disparities in adult mental health service utilization in the United States: A cross-sectional study.  Electronic Journal of General Medicine22(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/16747

(a) Koroma (2025); (b) This cross-sectional study examined factors associated with mental health service utilization among U.S. adults using national survey data; (c) found that White adults had the highest service utilization rate (28.3%), compared to Black (17.6%), Hispanic (16.1%), and Asian (10.3%) adults, with significant racial/ethnic disparities persisting even after controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors; (d) this research strengthens the justification for my study by providing recent evidence of the ongoing racial and ethnic disparities in mental health service utilization and highlighting the need to qualitatively explore the structural, cultural, and technological barriers contributing to these inequities

Ma, Y., Ramos, C., Wen, H., & Cummings, J. R. (2025). Racial and ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents.  JAMA Network Open8(6), e2516612. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16612

(a) Ma et al. (2025); (b) This cross-sectional study examined racial/ethnic differences in mental health service utilization (visits, medications, telemental health) among 23,541 U.S. adolescents using national survey data; (c) found that racial/ethnic minority adolescents (Black, Hispanic, Asian) were significantly less likely to receive any mental health visits, outpatient care, or telemental health services compared to White adolescents; (d) this research is important to my study because it documents persistent post-pandemic disparities in access and utilization among youth, highlighting the need to examine structural, cultural, and technological barriers affecting minority populations.

McCleary-Gaddy, A. T., & James, D. (2024). Dehumanization, attitudes toward seeking professional psychological care, and mental health among African American women.  Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology30(1), 166. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/cdp0000554

(a) McCleary-Gaddy & James (2024); (b) This study examined how cultural identity, discrimination, and dehumanization influence mental health treatment-seeking behaviors among African American women; (c) found that experiences of dehumanization and discrimination were associated with less favorable attitudes toward seeking professional psychological care, while mistrust of providers and the lack of culturally responsive mental health environments served as significant barriers to treatment-seeking; (d) this is relevant to my study because it highlights cultural barriers central to racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care access and utilization.

Pervez, R., & Anjum, N. (2023). Systemic barriers and interventions in healthcare for underserved communities: An exploration of health disparities.  Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences1(2), 19-24. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0747-3369

(a) Pervez & Anjum (2023); (b) looked at the structural and institutional barriers that impact access to healthcare for populations that are underserved; (c) found that logistical, institutional and systemic inequities are significant factors that contribute to interrupted care; (d) relevant because this gives evidence for the structural inequities that I will examine in the mental health context.

Rodgers, C. R., Flores, M. W., Bassey, O., Augenblick, J. M., & Lê Cook, B. (2022). Racial/ethnic disparity trends in children’s mental health care access and expenditures from 2010-2017: Disparities remain despite sweeping policy reform.  Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry61(7), 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.09.420

(a) Rodgers et al. (2022); (b) This study analyzed national trends in children’s mental health care access and expenditures using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 to 2017; (c) found that despite national policy reforms, disparities persisted and widened for Black youth compared to White youth, with Black children showing decreasing or stagnant mental health service use and lower expenditures over time; (d) this research is important to my study because it highlights the persistence of long-term racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care access from childhood into adolescence, underscoring the need to examine underlying structural, cultural, and technological barriers.

Van Doren, N., Zhu, Y., Vázquez, M. M., Shah, J., Grammer, A. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Eisenberg, D., Wilfley, D. E., Taylor, C. B., & Newman, M. G. (2024). Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Barriers to Mental Health Treatment Among U.S. College Students. Psychiatric Services, 75(9), 839-846.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230185

(a) Van Doren et al. (2024); (b) This study examined racial and ethnic differences in barriers to mental health treatment using a national sample of U.S. college students who were not currently in psychotherapy; (c) found significant disparities, with Black and Hispanic/Latina students reporting more financial and time-related barriers, while also showing greater willingness to seek treatment compared to White students; (d) this research is important to my study because it highlights structural and cultural barriers to mental health care access among racial and ethnic minority young adults and underscores the need for qualitative exploration of lived experiences with these interconnected barriers.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence, documentable discrepancies, and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

Problem

What was the social problem that prompted you to search the literature to find out more? Write in complete sentences using a scholarly tone.

The situation or issue that prompted me to search the literature is the issue of disparities in terms of race and ethnicity regarding access and use of mental health services amongst people under the criminal justice system in the United States. In the area of mental health needs, racial and ethnic minorities, specifically Blacks and Hispanics, tend to show similar or even higher rates than their White peers but show lower levels of utilization of services. Such disparity tends to be quite pronounced when speaking about forensic psychology practice which includes court-mandated competence assessment, mental health diversion program, correctional institutions, and re-entry programs. According to national statistics, for instance, while 50% of White adults with fair/poor self-rated mental health report service utilization, the numbers for Black adults with fair/poor self-rated mental health and Hispanic adults with fair/poor self-rated mental health are 39% and 36% respectively.

There is evidence of overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in the criminal justice system, and there are known roles of the mental health services in reducing recidivism, helping restore mental competence, and ensuring a proper re-entry into the community. However, there is a lack of qualitative literature on experiences of racial and ethnic minorities as clients of forensic mental health. There is little information available about barriers to mental health services for such population and decisions they make when facing the issue of obtaining mental health services in forensic setting.

Now that you have read and summarized some of the recent literature to understand your problem, and given what other researchers are exploring, what meaningful gap have you identified that your study will address? (What have others not yet explored about this problem that you will contribute with your study?)

Although researchers have investigated this issue, the topic has not been explored in this way: in terms of the absence of a comprehensive and integrated qualitative analysis of structural, cultural, and technological barriers and their interrelated impact on the lived experience of racial and ethnic minorities in the context of forensic mental health.

While the existing literature shows racial and ethnic disparities in access to and use of mental health services both among the general population and among justice-involved individuals, most of the studies focused either on particular barriers or used quantitative methods of research. For example, structural barriers such as systemic racism, low availability of services, overrepresentation of minorities in the criminal justice system were studied separately from cultural barriers such as stigma, mistrust, preference for informal sources of support and from technological barriers such as limited digital literacy and lack of access to telehealth services.

Little research has been conducted on the intersection of these barriers and the process of navigating forensic mental health settings by racial and ethnic minority justice-involved adults. Forensic mental health settings can include competency evaluation and competency restoration, forensic mental health diversion, jail- or prison-based mental health services, re-entry services. This gap needs to be addressed because it has significant implications for addressing recidivism and supporting forensic mental health practice and policy.

Based on all of the above information (social problem, literature review, gap), in one sentence, what is your research problem ?

The specific research problem that will be addressed through this study is the absence of an integrated perspective on the processes of experiencing, perceiving, and navigating the interconnected barriers – structural, cultural, and technological – in accessing and utilizing mental health services by racial and ethnic minorities who have become justice-involved adults in the context of forensic psychology, including competency evaluations, diversion programs, and re-entry services.

The problem statement formulates the phenomenological gap without making any assumptions about causality and remains closely connected to the formulated social problem and literature gap.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified? In other words, is addressing this problem the logical next step, given the previous exploratory and confirmatory research (or lack thereof) on this topic? It is not acceptable to simply replicate previous research for a Ph.D. degree.

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution? The problem must be an authentic "puzzle" that needs solving, not merely a topic that the researcher finds interesting. Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field or discipline.

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Complete the purpose sentence below and be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest.

The purpose of this Qualitative study is to examine the personal experiences and perceptions of adult members of racial and ethnic minorities involved in the criminal justice system as they relate to barriers associated with structure, culture, and technology that impact their access to and use of mental health services in forensic psychology settings.

Phenomenology offers a holistic view that takes into account the barriers and their effect on decision-making process regarding the utilization of mental health services among other aspects.

Framework (Conceptual or Theoretical)

What theory(ies) and/or concept(s) support (frame) your study and who are the original authors? Provide an in-text citation with your response, and the complete APA reference entry with summary in the Supporting Literature section.

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include the concept of intersectionality, which forms the main theoretical basis of the research (Crenshaw, 1989) and Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use as a supplementary theory (Andersen, 1995).

In this case, intersectionality is a general framework of the study, which implies a multifaceted and interconnected nature of various systems of oppression such as race, ethnicity, justice involvement, and socio-economic status, and their role in shaping lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority adults accessing forensic mental health services. It involves an appreciation of complexity of reality of the study participants that should go beyond one-dimensional analyses of disparity in access and use of health services. On the other hand, Andersen's Behavioral Model helps organize the analysis of various barriers to access and use of health services within predisposing, enabling, and need factors, which at the same time leaves room for integration into the study.

How do these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study?

The logical connections between the framework presented and the nature of my study include :Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Utilization (Andersen, 1995) serves as a useful tool for analyzing the predisposing, enabling, and need variables that affect the use of forensic mental health services. The intersectionality theory (Crenshaw, 1989) works in conjunction with this model by focusing on the overlapping of certain identities (race, ethnicity, gender, and justice involvement) and the barriers and marginalized experiences arising from them.

The theories assist in qualitatively analyzing disparities in the use of forensic mental health services by racial/ethnic minority adults involved with the justice system. These theoretical frameworks help in accomplishing the objective of the research project by going beyond one dimension.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical base or conceptual framework. Although many approaches can ground a study in the scientific literature, the essential requirement is that the problem is framed such that the new findings will have implications for the previous findings.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the question(s) that you plan to use to address the research problem. Your question(s) must align with your study purpose and include the variables and/or concepts and how they will be examined.

What are the real-life experiences of justice-involved adults who belong to ethnic/racial minorities concerning the structural, cultural, and technological barriers impacting their access to and utilization of forensic mental health services in the U.S?

This qualitative research question is directly linked to the purpose of the study in terms of examining the experiences of participants from the intersectional perspective and Andersen's Behavioral Model. Specifically, this research focuses on the ways in which these interlocking identities affect predisposing, enabling, and need variables in the framework of forensic psychology. No hypotheses will be stated due to the exploratory nature of the qualitative study.

Nature of the Study

What systematic approach/method and research design do you plan to use to address your research question(s)?

To address the research questions in this Qualitative study, the specific research design will include The specific research design will be a basic qualitative design with semi-structured interviews that will investigate the lived experiences of racial/ethnic minority adults facing structural, cultural, and technological barriers to mental health care access and utilization for the purpose of addressing the research questions identified in this qualitative study.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025).  Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

For your planned research design, what type of data will you need and what data collection instruments will provide it?

For my planned research design, I will need My proposed research design involves gathering primary qualitative data with semi-structured interviews with adults of racial and ethnic minority backgrounds with barriers to mental health care services. A semi-structured interview guide developed by the researcher will be the main data collection tool.

What data sources and analysis do you plan to use to answer your research question(s)?

The sources of data are going to involve purposive sampling of 12–15 racial and ethnic minorities (Black, Hispanic, and Asians) who are justice involved and have experienced challenges in access and use of forensic mental health services. The challenges will be established through self-report at screening time involving forensic evaluation, non-compliance with court-ordered treatment, or documented difficulties with access to community-based forensic mental health services. Audio-recorded interviews will be conducted to collect the data.

Thematic analysis, following the six-step process as presented by Braun & Clarke (2006), is going to be used: (a) Familiarisation with the data; (b) Generating initial codes; (c) Searching for themes; (d) Reviewing themes; (e) Defining and naming themes; (f) Producing the report.

This approach will be consistent with the qualitative research design and the frameworks of the intersectionality and Andersen's models.

Reference Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

What limitations, challenges, and/or barriers might you need to address while conducting this study (e.g., access to participants, access to data, requirements for storing data, separation of roles or other ethical considerations, instrumentation fees, etc.)?

There are several potential difficulties that can arise in the process of conducting this study. First, it is likely to encounter problems in recruiting 12-15 racial and ethnic minorities who have been in contact with the justice system since their history of distrust in relation to research and medical practice combined with the social stigma of being a part of both the mental health and justice systems is expected to make access difficult.

Ethical considerations are particularly important in this context. They involve proper handling of the power dynamic between researcher and participant with a justice background, protection of the voluntary nature of participation without coercing anyone, confidentiality in relation to the sensitive nature of both mental health and legal status, and reduction of emotional stress experienced during the interview. There are several extra measures that will be taken, including the use of trauma-informed interviewing techniques, appropriate informed consent procedures, and safe storage of data (encrypted audio recording and anonymized transcripts).

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry and has selected an approach that has potential to address the problem.

Significance

How will your study address the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change?

This study is significant in that it tackles an important problem that forensic psychologists face – the continuing racial and ethnic disparities in service use for mental disorders among people in contact with the criminal justice system. In this study, by analyzing the effect of structural, cultural, and technological barriers on the service use among racial/ethnic minority adults, the researchers will get unique information about how the combination of these barriers impacts the access to and involvement in the provision of forensic mental health services.

The results of the analysis will be useful for forensic psychology as the information obtained from the study can help forensic professionals create practices that would take into account predisposing cultural barriers, enabling barriers (including those related to technology use) and intersecting identities to provide services better to racial/ethnic minorities.

Specifically, the results of the research will help forensic psychologists to understand better how the predisposing cultural barriers, the barriers that make accessing and using services possible (enabling barriers), including technological barriers, and other aspects of clients' identity can affect service use in areas such as correctional mental health treatment, court mandated evaluations/interventions, competency restoration, reentry, and risk assessment procedures. The knowledge can be used to create policies and protocols to improve the situation and address the over-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in the criminal justice system.

The study promotes social change as the findings of the study will make forensic mental health care more fair and efficient.

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? As described in the Significance section, the anticipated findings have potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present a foregone conclusion. Even if the researcher has a strong opinion on the expected findings, the researcher must maximize scholarly objectivity by framing the problem in the context of a systematic inquiry that permits multiple possible conclusions.

Partner Site Masking Self-Check

Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance).

☒ Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest.

☐ If you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization.

Research Design Alignment Table

Hover over bold font for Instructions and click links for resources. |

Instructions | Quantitative Example Table | Qualitative Example Table

Research Design Alignment Table Video Tutorial (YouTube) | Doctoral Research Design Alignment Appointments or Office Hours

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem that will be addressed through this study is the lack of understanding of the role structural, cultural, and technological barriers play in the persistence of racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care access and utilization in the United States.

Purpose: This is a qualitative study to investigate the interplay of structural, cultural, and technological barriers to mental health access and utilization that could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the United States.

Framework: Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and the concepts of intersectionality underlie this study.

RQ1: What are the complex, multifaceted roles of structural, cultural, and technological barriers in impacting racial and ethnic minority individuals' access to and use of mental health care services in the U.S.?

Method: Qualitative

Design: Hermeneutic (interpretive) phenomenological design

Primary qualitative data gathered by means of semi-structured interview. Primary data collection will be based on a researcher designed semi-structured interview guide.

Purposive sampling of 12-15 people of color (Black, Hispanic, and Asian) adults with difficulties accessing or using mental health care services.

Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis approach

RQ2: Replace text with response.

Method: Choose method

Design: Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

RQ3: Replace text with response.

Method: Choose method

Design: Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Note. The information in the first column must align with all rows, and each individual RQ row must show alignment across the columns for that row.

Once your Research Design Alignment Table is completed, reflect on your design alignment. Ask yourself:

1. Is there a logical progression from the research problem to the purpose of the study?

2. Does the identified framework ground the investigation into the stated problem?

3. Do the problem, purpose, and framework in the left-hand column align with the RQ(s) (all rows)?

4. Does each RQ address the problem and align with the purpose of the study?

5. Does the information across each individual row match/align with the RQ listed for that row?

5. By row, will the variables listed address the RQ?

5. By row, will the analysis address the RQ?

5. By row, can the analysis be completed with the data points that will be collected?

Rubric Standard | Aligned > Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? The nature of the study should align with the problem, research questions, and tentative approaches to inquiry.

Appendix

The Doctoral Prospectus

The Doctoral Prospectus is a brief document that provides preliminary information about your dissertation research and is used in two ways:

1. It serves as the tentative plan for developing the proposal and is evaluated to ensure doctoral-level work (e.g., feasibility, alignment, etc.).

1. It provides information used to assign the committee University Research Reviewer.

Prospectus milestone approval from the committee chair, second committee member, and a program-level designee is required for you to move forward and work on your proposal. The plan is subject to change, and parts of your research design may need to be adjusted after you complete your exhaustive review of the literature during proposal development.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Title

Titles should be concise (aim for 15 words or fewer), be a statement, not a question, and no colons please. The title should indicate the main topic and the variables/concepts under study and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words (a searchable statement of what the manuscript contains). Avoid words that serve no purpose (such as methods, results, a study of..., or investigation of...), use full terms (avoid abbreviations), and capitalize any word of four or more letters, and all parts of a verb. For more information, see the F&S Checklist.

Quantitative (QN) Example

Differences in the Quality of Problem Statements Written Throughout the Capstone

Qualitative (QL) Example

How Online Doctoral Students Develop a Dissertation Problem Statement

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Background Literature

Probably the most important step in the research process is searching recent, peer-reviewed literature and reading articles related to the general area you want to investigate. The area is based on an identified social problem. As you read and learn, you will narrow your focus. This is how you will identify a discipline-specific research problem.

[ Note: Scholarly, empirical articles and how to find them.]

First, you’ll need to determine your search terms or keywords and the databases you should search. As you conduct your search of the literature, stay organized by keeping a search log.

Search Log Example

Database

Search Terms

Results

Notes

Education Source

online doctoral program completion; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

1175

Search too broad; Narrow by using multiple terms

ERIC

online doctoral program completion AND ABD; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

13

Much better; Several relevant articles found

Etc.

Example for this Form

The keywords and databases searched included ABD , online doctoral program completion, doctoral capstone completion, online research training, and online learning in the databases Education Source, ERIC, and SAGE Journals, as well as in a multidatabase search.

As you read and evaluate literature, you also need to organize your research. A literature review matrix is one way to help you visualize what has and hasn't been done in your field. It will help you understand the scholarly works related to your area of interest. The importance of organizing and recording your review of literature cannot be overstated. You will refer to your notes as you write, so start on the right track from the beginning!

[ Suggestion: If you keep your search log in an Excel workbook, use the second tab in the same workbook for your literature review matrix.]

For this form, include the complete, APA reference entry and (a) an in-text citation; (b) what they studied; (c) what they found; and (d) why this is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem. These sources provide justification that this problem is meaningful to the discipline or professional field. These references should ideally be from the past 5 years. Reference entries related to the framework should be included here, too. [ Note: During proposal development, you will conduct an exhaustive review and synthesize your sources, rather than summarize.]

Example (for one article; at least 10 are required)

Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078

(a) Ismail, Majid, and Ismail (2013); (b) focused on the student experience with supervision while learning to conduct research; (c) found three issues of lack of positive communication, lack of expertise, and power conflicts; and (d) this is important in relation to my study because it may help explain progress on the development of a problem statement in the capstone process.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Problem

Social Problem

The situation or issue being experienced by a population or within your discipline that prompted you to search the literature to find out more is sometimes called a social problem. It is the issue that students see “on the ground” so to speak. The social problem is often what prompts students to think about a topic of interest. Usually such a topic is one that students identify with, sometimes having personally experienced some aspect of the problem as it exists in the world.

Example Social Problem

The issue that prompted me to search the literature is the low completion rate of students in doctoral programs. It is common knowledge in the education discipline that only about half of the students who enter doctoral programs will complete, and the lack of progress is often due to the dissertation process. A search in The Chronicle of Higher Education will result in numerous articles about supporting doctoral students with their capstone research to improve the completion rates of doctoral programs.

Gap

The need to address an identified gap in the research literature must be clear and there must be current relevance to the discipline and area of practice. Keep in mind that a gap in the research is not, in and of itself, a reason to conduct research. The gap relates to the rubric standard: Meaningful.

Example Gap

Although researchers have investigated this issue, there is very little or no literature on the development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs.

Research Problem

A research problem is a focused topic of concern, a condition to be improved upon, or troubling question that is supported in scholarly literature or theory that you study to understand in more detail, and that can lead to recommendations for resolutions. It is the research problem that drives the rest of the dissertation: the purpose, the research questions, and the methodology.

QN Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

QL Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified?

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest. For example:

1. In quantitative studies, state what needs be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem.

1. In qualitative studies, describe the need for increased understanding about the issue to be studied, based on the identified gap or problem.

1. In mixed-methods studies, with both quantitative and qualitative aspects, clarify how the two approaches will be used together to inform the study.

QN Example of Purpose

The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral study development.

QL Example of Purpose

The purpose of this qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Framework

The framework includes the theories and/or concepts relevant to your topic. Align the framework with the problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. This theoretical or conceptual framework is the basis for understanding, designing, and analyzing ways to investigate your research problem (data collection and analysis). Provide the original scholarly literature (citing original authors) on the theory and/or concepts, even if it is more than 5 years old. Please do not cite secondary sources.

Example Theoretical Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

Example Conceptual Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

Next, explain how these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study. Your topic/approach should align with the identified framework so that you will either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic.

Example Connection for the Theoretical Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. The approach provides details on cognitive-structural changes that emerge as a result of development and learning.

Example Connection for the Conceptual Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. Further, subsequent research and application of Perry’s theory offer guidance on ways to facilitate academic development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical challenge of the dissertation.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the overarching question and/or a series of related questions that are informed by the study purpose, that will be used to address the research problem. A research question informs the research design by providing a foundation for:

1. generation of null and alternative hypotheses in quantitative studies,

1. questions necessary to build the design structure for qualitative studies, and

1. a process by which different methods will work together in mixed-methods studies.

QN Example RQs and Hypotheses

Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

H 01—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are no statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

H 1—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

QL Example RQ

For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Nature of the Study

Explain the systematic approach/method and research design you plan to use to address your research question(s). Examples of study design are as follows:

13. Quantitative—for experimental, quasiexperimental, or nonexperimental designs; treatment-control; repeated measures; causal-comparative; single-subject; predictive studies; or other quantitative approaches

13. Qualitative—for basic/generic qualitative design, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, narrative inquiry, phenomenological research, policy analysis, or other qualitative traditions

13. Mixed methods, primarily quantitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on quantitative methods

13. Mixed methods, primarily qualitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on qualitative methods

13. Other—for another design, to be specified with a justification provided for its use

QN Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this quantitative study, the specific research design will include a repeated-measures design (Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias, 2008) with objective ratings of student work products examined across time. This quantitative analysis should help pinpoint the amount of growth from the beginning to the end of the project.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences cd-rom  spss cd-rom vol 15. (7th ed.). Worth Pub.

QL Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this qualitative study, the specific research design will include a basic quality study and analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Saldaña J. (2016).  The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.

Then, for your planned research design, present the type of data you will need, and a list of possible data collection instruments that could be used to address the proposed research question(s). At this point, you should have an idea of the type of data needed to address your research question(s). Explain whether you will be collecting primary data (collected by the you, the researcher) or accessing secondary data (preexisting or public data collected by others). Possible secondary data sources, by program, are available on the Office of Research and Doctoral Services website. [ Note. This is your tentative plan, so keep in mind that things might need to be modified during the proposal stage—particularly after you have completed your exhaustive review of the literature.]

Type of Data (From IRB Form A): Interviews, focus groups, questionnaires/surveys that I administer; public records or documents; private records or documents (released by a school, clinic, business, or other entity); observations in public; observation in non-public spaces; other

Data Collection Instruments: Survey or questionnaire that I will create (not for measuring constructs); survey or questionnaire developed by others—provide specific name of instrument; researcher-created interview guide; observation guide, document review guide .

QN Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

QL Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

Next, provide the data sources and analysis you plan to use to answer your research question(s).

Data Sources: For existing data, list the specific databases that are the data sources; For data the researcher will collect, list the specific criteria for participants and ideas about how you will recruit them.

Data Analysis: For quantitative, provide variables, scales of measurement, and statistical analysis. For qualitative, Provide specific methods for qualitative data analysis.

QN Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

QL Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

Finally, provide information on limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to participants, access to data, separation of roles (researcher versus employee), instrumentation fees, etc. If you are thinking about collecting data on a sensitive topic or from a vulnerable population, an early consultation with the Institutional Review Board (IRB; [email protected]) during your prospectus process is recommended to gain ethics guidance that you can incorporate into your subsequent proposal drafts and research planning. [ Note. Find more information on research ethics and potential “red flag” issues on the IRB Guides and FAQs.]

QN Example

A potential barrier when using secondary data is that data access will probably include a partner-site agreement and potentially an external research ethics review (IRB), which may take some additional time. A possible barrier for collecting survey data is difficulty in recruitment of participants. I will attend IRB Office Hours to ask questions about these issues.

QL Example

A potential barrier when collecting primary data include partner site agreement and possible difficulty recruiting participants for interviews. Ensuring clear separation of my role at the institution from my role as researcher may also be a challenge.

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Significance

Here you explain how your study addresses the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and will therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change. Detail how your findings might support professional practice or allow practical application (answer the So what? question).

Example Significance

This study is significant in that it will fill a gap in understanding by focusing specifically on development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs. The results of this study should aid doctoral committees and academic programs in helping students to succeed in their final projects, thus supporting eventual degree attainment. Education has long been a force for social change by addressing inequities in society. Because a broad range of students attends online institutions, supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased diversity among individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change?

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

My Doctoral Research ( MyDR)

If you have not done so already, you should familiarize yourself with the My DR system. The MyDR system was designed to assist you and your committee in navigating your doctoral research journey, from the very beginning through the final approval. The various landing pages in MyDR will track your progress and will serve as a central location for resources to support that progress. There is a process flow tool in which you exchange and store faculty evaluations of and feedback on your work as you progress along that journey.

You will be entered into the MyDR system when both your committee chair and second member nominees are approved by the academic program. At that point, you will be able to access MyDR from the homepage of your dissertation completion course in Blackboard. The first document that you will submit for approval in MyDR will be your prospectus.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

QN Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

Purpose: The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral studies.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

RQ1: Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

Method: Quantitative

Design: A repeated-measures design

I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

QL Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Purpose: The purpose of this basic qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

RQ1: For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

Method: Qualitative

Design: basic qualitative

I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldañas (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

image1.png