W4A3 HEALTHCARE BUDGET REQUEST – ESTIMATING EXPENSES

NURS_6211_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsing the Healthcare Budget Request Guide for guidance, create a worksheet that records the following: Each of the estimated expenses associated with your proposed idea, including startup expenses. Be sure to label each appropriately, with enough description to make it clear what the item is and what the estimated cost involves. Each of the estimated revenues associated with your proposed idea. Be sure to label each appropriately, with enough description to make it clear what the item is and any necessary details regarding sources of revenues (including reimbursements). Calculate the total estimated expenses and revenues for the next 5-year period. Calculate the Return on Investment (ROI) for your proposed idea. Create a brief (1-2 page) description of your analysis that clearly describes the estimated financial impact of your proposed idea. Interpret the results by explaining what your ROI calculation means to the organization.

85 to >76.0 ptsExcellentThe analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail estimated values for expenses, revenue, and ROI. ... The analysis presents a complete, detailed, and specific list of estimated expenses and revenues over a 5-year period. ... The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific summary and interpretation of results that includes a discussion of the estimated financial impact and interpretation of the calculated values.

76 to >67.0 ptsGoodThe analysis accurately calculates and presents estimated values for expenses, revenue, and ROI. ... The analysis presents a relatively complete and detailed list of estimated expenses and revenues over a 5-year period. ... The analysis provides a relatively detailed and specific summary and interpretation of results that includes a discussion of the estimated financial impact and interpretation of the calculated values.

67 to >59.0 ptsFairThe analysis inaccurately calculates and presents estimated values for expenses, revenue, and ROI. ... The analysis presents an incomplete or vague list of estimated expenses and revenues over a 5-year period. ... The analysis provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or vague summary and interpretation of results or discussion of the estimated financial impact and interpretation of the calculated values.

59 to >0 ptsPoorThe analysis inaccurately calculates and presents estimated values for expenses, revenue, and ROI, or values/calculations are missing. ... The analysis presents an incomplete or vague list of estimated expenses and revenues over a 5-year period, or items are missing. ... The analysis provides an incomplete, inaccurate or vague summary and interpretation of results, discussion of the estimated financial impact and interpretation of the calculated values, or items are missing or unaddressed.

85 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided that delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts