Applying Process Improvement Models

blashill4

wk3rubricprojectdisc4220.html

Home >Nursing homework help >Applying Process Improvement Models

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NURS_4220_Week3_PracticeExperience_Rubric

	Excellent	Proficient	Basic	Needs Improvement
Required Content Chooses a process improvement model and applies this model to the practice problem. Describes the selected model and how each step will be used to develop the plan for the practicum quality and safety project. Continues to collaborate with the selected individuals in the practice environment and shares this information with the group.	Points: Points Range: 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Initial post contains well developed and insightful analysis that brings new insight into the discussion. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Initial post contains reasonable analysis that brings insight into the discussion. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12 (24%) - 14 (28%) Initial post contains minimal analysis that brings limited insight into the discussion. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 11 (22%) Initial post lacks analysis and/or that brings little or no insight into the discussion. Feedback:
Response Posts Entered the discussion thread on 3 separate days. Wrote at least two posts to two separate peers. Responses are appropriate to the topic, substantive, and promoted discussion by one or more of the following: • contributing insight to move the discussion forward. • offering substantial and/or different points of view and asks questions to add to discussion • including extra references or websites for peers to consider • relating discussion to different areas of practice and applying concepts to practice **Additional points may be deducted for late posting per the University late policy.	Points: Points Range: 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Response posts add substantial ideas and perspectives that invite further analysis and discussion. Participated 3 or more days in the classroom and responded to more than 2 classmates. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Response posts are proficient and provide adequate analysis and discussion. Participated 3 days in the classroom and responds to at least two classmates. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 10 (20%) - 14 (28%) Response posts are limited and provide minimal analysis and discussion. Participated less than 3 days in the classroom and/or responds to less than two classmates. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 9 (18%) Response posts are inadequate and provide no analysis of discussion and/ or there is no participation in the classroom. Feedback:
Writing and Format Uses evidence to support a claim and give credit to the source. Uses course learning resources and seeks additional scholarly resources to support ideas. Displays sentence, paragraph, and essay skills. Writes in a scholarly, well-organized manner using own words by synthesizing evidence/resources. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarism of the source. APA: No more than one short, unique quote with correct APA format. Appropriate use and format of in-text citations and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 9 (18%) - 10 (20%) Writer demonstrates excellence in all sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 7 (14%) - 8 (16%) Writer demonstrates proficiency of most sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with only one format or writing issue needing to be addressed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 5 (10%) - 6 (12%) Writer demonstrates minimal skill in meeting sentence level and/or paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with less than or equal to three format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (8%) Writer demonstrates inadequate skill within discussion board posts to meet the sentence and/or and paragraph level skills in meeting the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with four or more format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Feedback:

Excellent

Proficient

Basic

Needs Improvement

Required Content Chooses a process improvement model and applies this model to the practice problem. Describes the selected model and how each step will be used to develop the plan for the practicum quality and safety project. Continues to collaborate with the selected individuals in the practice environment and shares this information with the group.

Points: Points Range: 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Initial post contains well developed and insightful analysis that brings new insight into the discussion. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Initial post contains reasonable analysis that brings insight into the discussion. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 12 (24%) - 14 (28%) Initial post contains minimal analysis that brings limited insight into the discussion. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 11 (22%) Initial post lacks analysis and/or that brings little or no insight into the discussion. Feedback:

Response Posts Entered the discussion thread on 3 separate days. Wrote at least two posts to two separate peers. Responses are appropriate to the topic, substantive, and promoted discussion by one or more of the following:

• contributing insight to move the discussion forward.

• offering substantial and/or different points of view and asks questions to add to discussion

• including extra references or websites for peers to consider

• relating discussion to different areas of practice and applying concepts to practice

**Additional points may be deducted for late posting per the University late policy.

Points: Points Range: 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Response posts add substantial ideas and perspectives that invite further analysis and discussion. Participated 3 or more days in the classroom and responded to more than 2 classmates. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Response posts are proficient and provide adequate analysis and discussion. Participated 3 days in the classroom and responds to at least two classmates. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 10 (20%) - 14 (28%) Response posts are limited and provide minimal analysis and discussion. Participated less than 3 days in the classroom and/or responds to less than two classmates. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 9 (18%) Response posts are inadequate and provide no analysis of discussion and/ or there is no participation in the classroom. Feedback:

Writing and Format Uses evidence to support a claim and give credit to the source. Uses course learning resources and seeks additional scholarly resources to support ideas. Displays sentence, paragraph, and essay skills. Writes in a scholarly, well-organized manner using own words by synthesizing evidence/resources. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarism of the source. APA: No more than one short, unique quote with correct APA format. Appropriate use and format of in-text citations and reference list.

Points: Points Range: 9 (18%) - 10 (20%) Writer demonstrates excellence in all sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 7 (14%) - 8 (16%) Writer demonstrates proficiency of most sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with only one format or writing issue needing to be addressed. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 5 (10%) - 6 (12%) Writer demonstrates minimal skill in meeting sentence level and/or paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with less than or equal to three format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Feedback:

Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (8%) Writer demonstrates inadequate skill within discussion board posts to meet the sentence and/or and paragraph level skills in meeting the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with four or more format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Required Content Chooses a process improvement model and applies this model to the practice problem. Describes the selected model and how each step will be used to develop the plan for the practicum quality and safety project. Continues to collaborate with the selected individuals in the practice environment and shares this information with the group.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Initial post contains well developed and insightful analysis that brings new insight into the discussion. Proficient 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Initial post contains reasonable analysis that brings insight into the discussion. Basic 12 (24%) - 14 (28%) Initial post contains minimal analysis that brings limited insight into the discussion. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 11 (22%) Initial post lacks analysis and/or that brings little or no insight into the discussion. Feedback:

Response Posts Entered the discussion thread on 3 separate days. Wrote at least two posts to two separate peers. Responses are appropriate to the topic, substantive, and promoted discussion by one or more of the following:

• contributing insight to move the discussion forward.

• offering substantial and/or different points of view and asks questions to add to discussion

• including extra references or websites for peers to consider

• relating discussion to different areas of practice and applying concepts to practice

**Additional points may be deducted for late posting per the University late policy.-- Levels of Achievement: Excellent 18 (36%) - 20 (40%) Response posts add substantial ideas and perspectives that invite further analysis and discussion. Participated 3 or more days in the classroom and responded to more than 2 classmates. Proficient 15 (30%) - 17 (34%) Response posts are proficient and provide adequate analysis and discussion. Participated 3 days in the classroom and responds to at least two classmates. Basic 10 (20%) - 14 (28%) Response posts are limited and provide minimal analysis and discussion. Participated less than 3 days in the classroom and/or responds to less than two classmates. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 9 (18%) Response posts are inadequate and provide no analysis of discussion and/ or there is no participation in the classroom. Feedback:

Writing and Format Uses evidence to support a claim and give credit to the source. Uses course learning resources and seeks additional scholarly resources to support ideas. Displays sentence, paragraph, and essay skills. Writes in a scholarly, well-organized manner using own words by synthesizing evidence/resources. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarism of the source. APA: No more than one short, unique quote with correct APA format. Appropriate use and format of in-text citations and reference list.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (18%) - 10 (20%) Writer demonstrates excellence in all sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level. Proficient 7 (14%) - 8 (16%) Writer demonstrates proficiency of most sentence and paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with only one format or writing issue needing to be addressed. Basic 5 (10%) - 6 (12%) Writer demonstrates minimal skill in meeting sentence level and/or paragraph level skills within discussion board posts to meet the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with less than or equal to three format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 4 (8%) Writer demonstrates inadequate skill within discussion board posts to meet the sentence and/or and paragraph level skills in meeting the Capstone Academic Writing Expectations for this level with four or more format or writing issues needing to be addressed. Feedback:

Total Points: 50