Similarity, Speech Acts, and Making Meaning of Language

Week 3 Assignment

Student Name

0.0%

0.00

/10

Word Similarity, Speech Acts, and Making Meaning of Language

Missing

Does not meet expectations

Almost meets expectations

Meets expectations

Exceeds expectations

Your Score

Part A: Word Similarity Chart

Complete the chart for Part A

Missing

Identified 1-8 word groups correctly

Identified 9 word groups correctly

Identified 10 word groups correctly

Identified 11-12 word groups correctly

0

1.3

1.5

1.7

2

Part A Points Possible:

2

Part A Points Earned:

Part A Comments

Part B: Social Language

Define honorifics

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples; does not address the two main types of honorifics

Response is incomplete; only explains one of the two types of honorifics

Response is mostly clear; mix of general and specific support; focuses more on type of honorifics and briefly mentions the other

Response is clear and complete; term clearly explained and supported by specific examples; explains two main types of honorifics

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Explained the rules for using honorifics to address others in English in various social settings

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples; does not address impact of social settings

Response is incomplete; uses generalities

Response is mostly clear; mix of general and specific support; focuses on one type of social setting

Response is clear and complete; explains uses of honorifics in English; addresses various social settings; uses specific examples

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Compared rules for using honorifics to address others in Spanish (or another language) in various social settings

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples; does not address impact of social settings

Response is incomplete; uses generalities

Response is mostly clear; mix of general and specific support; focuses on one type of social setting

Response is clear and complete; explains uses of honorifics in another language; addresses various social settings; uses specific examples

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Used at least one reference for support

Missing

Includes citation or reference but not both

Includes both in-text citation and full final reference

0

0.38

0.5

Use appropriate academic style, including sentence structure, tone, vocabulary, transitions, etc.

Missing

Style is lacking; frequent errors affect meaning often

Style is limited; errors remain which could affect overall message.

Style is proficient; errors remain, but are unlikely to affect overall message.

Style is advanced; few to no errors.

0

0.16

0.19

0.21

0.25

Use correct spelling, grammar, mechanics, APA, etc.

Missing

Usage is lacking; frequent errors affect meaning often

Usage is limited; errors remain which could affect overall message.

Usage is proficient; errors remain, but are unlikely to affect overall message.

Usage is advanced; few to no errors.

0

0.16

0.19

0.21

0.25

Part B Points Possible:

4

Part B Points Earned:

0

Word count:

Required:

200

Deduction:

100%

0.00

Plagiarism/Unoriginal Work Penalty

% match in TII

0%

Deduction:

0.00

Part 1 Points Possible:

4

Final Part B Points Earned:

0

Part B Comments

Part C: Competence vs. Performance

Identify and define the stages in language cycle

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples; does not address all stages

Response is incomplete; only explains one or two stages

Response is mostly clear; mix of general and specific support; mentions all stages; describes most stages in detail

Response is clear and complete; term clearly explained and supported by specific examples; explains all stages in detail

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Explain language shift, how it could happen, and its significance to the life cycle of language

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples

Response is incomplete; uses generalities; does not address both cause and significance

Response is mostly clear; term is defined; mix of general and specific support; focuses on one part of question over the other

Response is clear and complete; term clearly defined; cause and significance explained with specific examples

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Explained language revitalization and its significance to the life cycle of language

Missing

Response is vague; lacks specific examples

Response is incomplete; uses generalities; does not address significance

Response is mostly clear; term is defined; mix of general and specific support

Response is clear and complete; term clearly defined; significance explained with specific examples

0

0.65

0.75

0.85

1

Used at least one reference for support

Missing

Includes citation or reference but not both

Includes both in-text citation and full final reference

0

0.38

0.5

Use appropriate academic style, including sentence structure, tone, vocabulary, transitions, etc.

Missing

Style is lacking; frequent errors affect meaning often

Style is limited; errors remain which could affect overall message.

Style is proficient; errors remain, but are unlikely to affect overall message.

Style is advanced; few to no errors.

0

0.16

0.19

0.21

0.25

Use correct spelling, grammar, mechanics, APA, etc.

Missing

Usage is lacking; frequent errors affect meaning often

Usage is limited; errors remain which could affect overall message.

Usage is proficient; errors remain, but are unlikely to affect overall message.

Usage is advanced; few to no errors.

0

0.16

0.19

0.21

0.25

Part C Points Possible:

4

Part C Points Earned

0

Word count:

Required:

200

Deduction:

100%

0.00

Plagiarism/Unoriginal Work Penalty

% match in TII

0%

Deduction:

0.00

Part 1 Points Possible:

4

Final Part C Points Earned:

0

Part C Comments

Total Points Possible:

10

Total Points Earned:

0

Late Penalty: 10% per day, up to 2 days

submitted on time

0

Final Grade:

0