Wk 4 – Self-Assessment Worksheet
Running Head: ANIMAL RESEARCH 1
Animal Subjects in Medical research
Antwaniesha Edwards
ENG/200
ANIMAL RESEARCH 2
Medical research, also known as experimental research, comprises various research starting
with basic research, which involves fundamental scientific principles and clinical research. Clinical
research comprises the study of humans or animals who, in this regard, are subjects for clinical
trials. It is also research done to understand more about human beings' health and diseases that
affect them. However, animal testing has become a common practice in medical research to
develop vaccines and drugs for human illnesses other the years. Medical research that relies on
animal testing should be banned because it violates animal rights; it is morally wrong and leads to
animal subjects' death.
Experimental research violates animal rights by not giving them a chance to speak or
accept to be used as subjects. Through medical research contributes to the suffering of animals and
inflicting body pain on the animals. "In the context of animal rights, Regan believes that animals
should have certain moral rights, such as the right to bodily integrity and the right not to suffer,"
(Kotzmann & Pendergrast, 2019). For example, a nicotine study in 2014 required squirrel
monkeys to get addicted to nicotine to test its effect on human beings (Kaplan, 2018). These tests
later cause problems in the monkeys, such as gastric bloat, which leaves them in pain. The use of
animals in medical research is wrong as it contributes to a violation of animal rights.
The use of animals in medical research is ineffective because other people consider it
morally wrong and use plant-based diets to keep themselves healthy. Human beings are guided by
morals and laws which depict and direct their daily activities towards each other and living things
around them. For example, vegetarians and vegan diets shy away from consuming animal-based
products because it is not right. People are likely to pursue a plant-based diet because of personal
health, environment, and animal rights (Hopwood et al., 2020). The use of animals in practical
ANIMAL RESEARCH 3
medicinal research is morally wrong and may not be effective because animals suffer from
different illnesses and react differently to medicines, unlike human beings.
Medical research relying on animal testing as test subjects should be banned because it
leads to animals' death. Kaplan (2018) explains that the nicotine research in 2014 began with 24
squirrel monkeys, but four of the monkeys had died by the end. Hunting of medicine or testing for
the effects of various elements on human beings, such as nicotine, through animals, is infringing on
their democracy (Donaldson, 2020). Like human beings, animals should be given the right to
advocacy and political help to prevent the animal kingdom from dying on research tables for
human benefit.
The use of animals as test subjects for medicinal research is a debate that has been going on
for years. Animal testing should be stopped because it leads to the violation of animal rights
despite the fact that animals cannot speak for themselves. It is also a method that cannot produce
effective results because human testing is required to test the effectiveness of the research
outcomes at the end of the day. Animals also react differently to certain substances and diseases,
which differ from human reactions on the same aspect. It can also lead to the death of the subject
animals, which brings out morality and justice for animals used in the research.
ANIMAL RESEARCH 4
Reference
Donaldson, S. (2020). Animal Agora: Animal Citizens and the Democratic Challenge. Social
Theory and Practice. Vol. 46, No. 4.
Hopwood. C., J, Bleidorn, W., Schwaba, T. &,Chen, S. (2020)Health, environmental, and animal
rights motives for vegetarian eating.PLoSONE15(4):e0230609.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023060
Kaplan, S. (2018, January 26). The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/health/fda-monkeys-nicotine.html
Kotzmann, J. and Pendergrast, N. (2019). Animal rights: Time to start unpacking what rights and
for whom. Mitchell Hamline