help

Latrecia Stewart

Walden University

July 12, 2020

Discussion.

Generally, the article meets the professional standards set for scholarly writing because of various reasons. First, the materials used in the research are only journals that are peer reviewed and therefore the information is legit. The authors have used many journals over 70, to come up with their conclusion and therefore, the conclusion made cannot be bias, which are are strictly for human resource and public sector administrations making them more appropriate for the research since most of the are obtained from the international journals. The coverage in the article is of various continents such as UK, the US and many others, hence a good representation of what happens in the world at large and less likelihood of being biased. The evidence gathered in the article of high quality because of the massive comparison made from the huge number of articles used. Writing style and format differs with the institutions but all the fundamentals are considered in the article and the sources of the information included are all cited and referenced as expected (Paul Boselie, 2019).

Audience might perceive the message differently depending upon their positions. For instance, HRM staff could think that the author is showing their shortcomings in their service and how other staff elsewhere are performing, government officials could see this as an exposure of the pressures they give the HR staff and the reason why HR department is not efficient while scholars could see this as a source of information and areas they should research on. Given a chance to revise this article, I would address the audience’s categories individually and recommend some of the ways in which they could make HR in public sector better and more effective regardless of their continents and the policies in their respective organizations or continents.

References Paul Boselie, J. V. (2019). A human resource management review on public management and public administration research: stop right there…before we go any further…. Public Management Review. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1695880