wk2a Mental Health

Exemplary

Proficient

Progressing

Emerging

Unsatisfactory

Not Submitted

Assignment Expectations: The extent to which work includes the required components and integration of learning resources.

2.7 (22.5%) - 3 (25%)

Thoroughly addressed all required components of the assignment with a well-developed submission that exceeds expectations and includes reference to and integration of the learning resources.

2.4 (20%) - 2.65 (22.08%)

Addressed all required components of the assignment, including reference to and integration of the learning resources.

2.1 (17.5%) - 2.35 (19.58%)

Addressed most of the required components of the assignment, including reference to and integration of the learning resources OR addressed all components of the assignment but did not include reference to and integration of the learning resources.

1.5 (12.5%) - 2 (16.67%)

Addressed some of the required components of the assignment but did not include reference to and integration of the learning resources.

.2 (1.67%) - 1.4 (11.67%)

Addressed few required components of the assignment and did not include reference to and integration of the learning resources.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Did not submit.

Learning Objective: The extent to which mastery of knowledge is demonstrated relative to the learning objective.

2.7 (22.5%) - 3 (25%)

Demonstrated understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was mastered.

2.4 (20%) - 2.65 (22.08%)

Demonstrated understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was met.

2.1 (17.5%) - 2.35 (19.58%)

Demonstrated some understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was partially met.

1.5 (12.5%) - 2 (16.67%)

Demonstrated marginal understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was minimally met.

.2 (1.67%) - 1.4 (11.67%)

Demonstrated minimal understanding and integration of course content to the extent that the learning objective was not met.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Did not submit.

Expression and Formatting: The extent to which scholarly, critical, and analytical writing is presented in APA format.

2.7 (22.5%) - 3 (25%)

Writing is organized, concise, and scholarly with minimal to no grammatical errors. Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas.

2.4 (20%) - 2.65 (22.08%)

Writing is somewhat unclear or interrupted by a few grammatical errors. Demonstrates some use of credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas.

2.1 (17.5%) - 2.35 (19.58%)

Writing is unclear or interrupted by grammatical errors. Demonstrates some use of credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas.

1.5 (12.5%) - 2 (16.67%)

Writing mostly lacks clarity, organization and has significant grammatical errors. Demonstrates minimal use of sources to support ideas.

.2 (1.67%) - 1.4 (11.67%)

Writing lacks clarity, organization and has significant grammatical errors. Demonstrates no use of sources to support ideas.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Did not submit.

Peer Responses: The extent to quality and quantity of peer responses was achieved.

2.7 (22.5%) - 3 (25%)

Responded to two peers in a manner that significantly contributed to the discussion.

2.4 (20%) - 2.65 (22.08%)

Responded to two or more peers in a manner that marginally contributed to the discussion.

2.1 (17.5%) - 2.35 (19.58%)

Responded to only one peer in a manner that contributed to the discussion, or to one or more peers in a manner that marginally contributed to the discussion.

1.5 (12.5%) - 2 (16.67%)

Responded to one or more peers in a manner that lacked clarity, organization, articulation, or professionalism.

.2 (1.67%) - 1.4 (11.67%)

Responded to one or more peers in a manner that lacked clarity, organization, articulation, and professionalism.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Did not submit.

Total Points: 12