Wk 2 Assgn (6051)
Prep11
wk2Rubric6051.htmlRubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: · Explain the concept of a knowledge worker. · Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. | Points: Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing. Includes: 1 or fewer resources. Feedback: |
| · Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts. | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing. Feedback: |
| · Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies. | Points: Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 24 (24%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: · Explain the concept of a knowledge worker. · Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources. Good 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources. Fair 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources. Poor 0 (0%) - 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing. Includes: 1 or fewer resources. Feedback:· Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Good 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation. Fair 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague. Poor 0 (0%) - 10 (10%) The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing. Feedback:· Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Good 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. Fair 25 (25%) - 27 (27%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate. Poor 0 (0%) - 24 (24%) The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Poor 0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
Name: NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
