Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 2: Academic Resources and Strategies

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in Week 1 to develop the second component: academic resources and strategies. To do this: ·   Identify and describe at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.

Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response partially identifies and partially describes at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response vaguely identifies and vaguely describes at least two academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response only vaguely and inaccurately identifies one academic resource or strategy or the three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Feedback:

·   Identify and describe at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or your specialty in particular.

Points:

Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response partially identifies and partially describes at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response vaguely identifies and vaguely describes at least two professional resources that can be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response only vaguely and inaccurately identifies and vaguely describes one professional resource or the three professional resources that can be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Feedback:

·   Explain how you intend to use these resources, and how they might benefit you academically and professionally.

Points:

Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%)

Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail the intended use of these resources, including a detailed explanation of how they might be beneficial academically and professionally.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

Response explains the intended use of these resources, including an explanation of how they might be beneficial academically and professionally.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 25 (25%) - 27 (27%)

Explanation of the intended use of these resources, including an explanation of how they might be beneficial academically and professionally is vague or inaccurate.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 24 (24%)

Explanation of the intended use of these resources, including an explanation of how they might be beneficial academically and professionally is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:

Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Total Points: 100