W2A2 HEALTHCARE BUDGET REQUEST AND WORKBOOK TEMPLATE

NURS_6211_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page executive summary that describes the issue or opportunity that you are analyzing. Your executive summary should include the following: Describe the healthcare issue or opportunity you selected. Describe the stakeholder groups impacted by this issue/opportunity. Explain which stakeholder groups would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue or opportunity you selected and why. Be specific and provide examples. Describe the healthcare product or service for which you propose to address the identified gaps/opportunities and explain why.Provide scholarly support for the issue or opportunity and your new product or service idea.

85 to >76.0 ptsExcellentThe executive summary clearly and completely describes the selected healthcare issue or opportunity and impacted stakeholders. ... Summary provides specific examples of and explanations for healthcare stakeholder groups responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue or opportunity. ... The executive summary clearly and completely describes the selected healthcare product or service being proposed and relates the value to current organizational or general healthcare gaps. ... The executive summary includes credible, authentic, and detailed scholarly support that fully aligns with the issue/opportunity identified and the proposed product/service.

76 to >67.0 ptsGoodThe executive summary describes the selected healthcare issue or opportunity and impacted stakeholders. ... Summary provides examples of and explanations for healthcare stakeholder groups responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue or opportunity. ... The executive summary clearly describes the selected healthcare product or service being proposed and relates the value to current organizational or general healthcare gaps. ... The executive summary includes some credible and authentic scholarly support that may align with the issue/opportunity identified and the proposed product/service.

67 to >59.0 ptsFairThe executive summary vaguely or incompletely describes the selected healthcare issue or opportunity and impacted stakeholders. ... Summary provides few examples of and/or vague explanations for healthcare stakeholder groups responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue or opportunity. ... The executive summary is vague or incomplete in describing the selected healthcare product or service being proposed and/or loosely relates the value to current organizational or general healthcare gaps. ... The executive summary includes scholarly support that is vague or incomplete and somewhat aligns with the issue/opportunity identified and the proposed product/service.

59 to >0 ptsPoorThe executive summary vaguely or incompletely describes the selected healthcare issue or opportunity and impacted stakeholders, with items missing or unaddressed. ... Summary provides little or no examples of and/or vague explanations for healthcare stakeholder groups responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue or opportunity. ... The executive summary is vague or incomplete in describing the selected healthcare product or service being proposed and/or fails to relate the value to current organizational or general healthcare gaps. ... The executive summary includes scholarly support that is vague, incomplete, and does not align with the issue/opportunity identified and the proposed product/service.

85 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided that delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria. ... The Excel Assignment Workbook is submitted.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. ... The Excel Assignment Workbook is not submitted.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. ... The Excel Assignment Workbook is not submitted.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. ... The Excel Assignment Workbook is not submitted.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3–4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts