Wk 2. DAT 565: Predictive and Qualitative Analysis Report
DAT/565 v4
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
DAT/565 Grading Rubrics Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Predictive and Qualitative Analysis Report .................................................................................................................. 2 Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Call Time Business Research Email ............................................................................................................................ 4 Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Information Visualization Parking Space Usage Presentation .................................................................................... 6
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 2 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Predictive and Qualitative Analysis Report Criteria
Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Scope and descriptive statistics
Weight: 10%
Clearly and completely discussed the report’s objective, the current data and variables that were analyzed, and the descriptive statistical findings
Mostly clearly and completely discussed the report’s objective, the current data and variables that were analyzed, and the descriptive statistical findings
Somewhat clearly and partially completely discussed the report’s objective, the current data and variables that were analyzed, and the descriptive statistical findings
Vaguely or incompletely discussed, or did not discuss, the report’s objective, the current data and variables that were analyzed, and the descriptive statistical findings
Scatter plot analysis
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully analyzed the scatter plots, including relationship of the variables and conclusions that can be drawn
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully analyzed the scatter plots, including relationship of the variables and conclusions that can be drawn
Analyzed the scatter plots, including relationship of the variables and conclusions that can be drawn, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Narrowly analyzed, or did not analyze, the scatter plots, including relationship of the variables and conclusions that can be drawn and showed no insight
Expansion criteria analysis
Weight: 20%
Thoroughly and insightfully assessed the expansion criteria’s effectiveness
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully assessed the expansion criteria’s effectiveness
Assessed the expansion criteria’s effectiveness, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely assessed, or did not assess, the expansion criteria’s effectiveness and showed no insight
Loyalty card analysis
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully analyzed the loyalty card program, including if it positively impacts sales growth, what demographics should be targeted, and how to collect and evaluate effectiveness of recommendations
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully analyzed the loyalty card program, including if it positively impacts sales growth, what demographics should be targeted, and how to collect and evaluate effectiveness of recommendations
Analyzed the loyalty card program, including if it positively impacts sales growth, what demographics should be targeted, and how to collect and evaluate effectiveness of recommendations, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely analyzed, or did not analyze, the loyalty card program, including if it positively impacts sales growth, what demographics should be targeted, and how to collect and evaluate effectiveness of recommendations and showed no insight
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 3 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Digital fluency: Digital information literacy
Weight: 5%
Thoroughly researched and gathered enough information from a variety of sources, analyzed the plausibility and accuracy of the information, and used it appropriately to inform action
Mostly researched and gathered information from a variety of sources, analyzed the plausibility and accuracy of the information, and used it appropriately to inform action; more detail is needed
Partially researched and gathered information from a variety of sources, analyzed the plausibility and accuracy of the information, and used it appropriately to inform action; much more detail is needed and there may be some inaccuracies
Did not sufficiently research or gather information from a variety of sources, analyze the plausibility and accuracy of the information, or use it appropriately to inform action, or did so with major inaccuracies
APA, grammar, and writing mechanics
Weight: 5%
Greatly enhanced content through accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Moderately enhanced content through rare inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Somewhat detracted from content through occasional inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Greatly detracted from content through frequent inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 4 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Call Time Business Research Email
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Impact of new protocol
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully analyzed the PE protocol on time in queue, service time, and whether it should be implemented widely
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully analyzed the PE protocol on time in queue, service time, and whether it should be implemented widely
Analyzed the PE protocol on time in queue, service time, and whether it should be implemented widely, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Narrowly analyzed, or did not analyze, the PE protocol on time in queue, service time, and whether it should be implemented widely and showed no insight
Impact of keeping current protocol
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully explained the impact on service time and time in queue if retaining the PT protocol and if there is a 20% increase in calls using the PT protocol
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully explained the impact on service time and time in queue if retaining the PT protocol and if there is a 20% increase in calls using the PT protocol
Explained the impact on service time and time in queue if retaining the PT protocol and if there is a 20% increase in calls using the PT protocol, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely explained, or did not explain, the impact on service time and time in queue if retaining the PT protocol and if there is a 20% increase in calls using the PT protocol and showed no insight
Additional metrics and data
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully justified whether current data is enough to determine the success of the PE protocol and suggested additional metrics and data to measure the performance of the call center
Mostly thoroughly and moderately insightfully justified whether current data is enough to determine the success of the PE protocol and suggested additional metrics and data to measure the performance of the call center
Justified whether current data is enough to determine the success of the PE protocol and suggested additional metrics and data to measure the performance of the call center, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely justified, or did not justify, whether current data is enough to determine the success of the PE protocol and vaguely suggested, or did not suggest, additional metrics and data to measure the performance of the call center and showed no insight
Cultural competence and ethics: Respectful
Strongly engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural
Sufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural
Insufficiently engaged in transparent conversations and responded ethically in professional intercultural
Did not sufficiently engage in transparent conversations or respond ethically in professional
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 5 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
communication and interaction
Weight: 5%
settings; inclusively acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities
settings; adequately acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities
settings; narrowly acknowledged the value of others within diverse communities
intercultural settings; inappropriately acknowledged or did not acknowledge the value of others within diverse communities
APA, grammar, and writing mechanics
Weight: 5%
Greatly enhanced content through accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Moderately enhanced content through rare inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Somewhat detracted from content through occasional inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Greatly detracted from content through frequent inaccuracies in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 6 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Information Visualization Parking Space Usage Presentation
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Project goals and recommendations
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully outlined the project rationale, goals, and the recommendation of whether to continue the project
Adequately outlined the project rationale, goals, and the recommendation of whether to continue the project; and showed moderate insight
Partially outlined the project rationale, goals, and the recommendation of whether to continue the project; and showed limited insight
Vaguely outlined, or did not outline, the project rationale, goals, and the recommendation of whether to continue the project; and showed no insight
Box plot analyses
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully analyzed the box plot charts for daily occupancy rates and by parking lot
Adequately analyzed the box plot charts for daily occupancy rates and by parking lot and showed moderate insight
Analyzed the box plot charts for daily occupancy rates and by parking lot, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely analyzed, or did not analyze, the box plot charts for daily occupancy rates and by parking lot and showed no insight
Scatter plot analyses
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and insightfully analyzed the selected scatter plot charts by time of day
Adequately analyzed the selected scatter plot charts by time of day and showed moderate insight
Analyzed the selected scatter plot charts by time of day, but lacked necessary detail and showed limited insight
Vaguely analyzed, or did not analyze, the selected scatter plot charts by time of day and showed no insight
Critical thinking and problem solving: Make judgements, draw conclusions
Weight: 5%
Judgement to arrive at a conclusion was sound; identified and recommended the best solution
Judgement to arrive at a conclusion was mostly sound; identified and recommended an acceptable solution
Judgement to arrive at a conclusion was partially sound; identified and recommended a less favorable solution
Judgement to arrive at a conclusion was not sound or was illogical; identified and recommended an impractical solution or did not recommend a solution
APA, grammar, and writing mechanics
Greatly enhanced content through accuracy in grammar, sentence
Moderately enhanced content through rare inaccuracies in grammar,
Somewhat detracted from content through occasional inaccuracies in grammar,
Greatly detracted from content through frequent inaccuracies in grammar,
Grading Rubrics DAT/565 v4 Page 7 of 7
Copyright 2023 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria Exemplary 90–100% A- to A
Proficient 74-89% C to B+
Developing 60-73% D to C-
Needs Improvement 0-59%
F
Weight: 5% structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
sentence structures, sentence boundaries, word choice, and APA formatting
- DAT/565 Grading Rubrics
- Wk 2 Summative Assessment: Predictive and Qualitative Analysis Report
- Wk 4 Summative Assessment: Call Time Business Research Email
- Wk 6 Summative Assessment: Information Visualization Parking Space Usage Presentation