WAQP Week 2 Assignment

profileMs90
WK1Assgn_Keys_TLLB.docx

PhD Prospectus Form

Students | Complete your doctoral prospectus within this form. Write your responses in the white spaces using a scholarly tone and include in-text citations and APA reference entries, where appropriate. You can click on underlined terms and headings for descriptions, resource links, and examples located in the Appendix. For additional prospectus information and resources, refer to the Doctoral Research Coach. Complete the Research Design Alignment Table within this form using the information from earlier sections and self-assess your research design alignment. Submit this completed form into MyDR for formal evaluation and feedback when your committee chair indicates that you are ready to do so.

Student’s Name | Turissa Alisha Keys Student ID | A01194468

Program and Specialization * | Click or tap here to enter text. Submission Date | 5/31/2026

*Remember that your study focus must be within the realm of your program and specialization area.

Evaluators Only | Complete this section and provide feedback on responses and rubric scores in the form where noted.

Committee Chairperson Name: Dr. Leggie L. Boone Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Second Committee Member Name: Dr. Sandra Caramela-Miller Overall Assessment: Choose score.

PhD Program Director: Dr. Jessie Lee Overall Assessment: Choose score.

Rubric Standard | Complete > Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Refer to the annotated outline to see the required parts of the Dissertation Prospectus document.

Note. Please complete following the directions provided, using the stem sentences, and referring to the examples in the appendix.

Title

Provide a concise (aim for 15 words or fewer) working title for this study. Include the main topic, variables/concepts under investigation, and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mental Health Care Access and Utilization in the United States Comment by Boone, Leggie: For a qualitative study, the title should emphasize the phenomenon being explored, the participants, and often the qualitative approach rather than implying statistical measurement of disparities. The phrase "racial and ethnic disparities" is often associated with quantitative comparisons, so a qualitative title should focus on experiences, perceptions, barriers, or meanings related to mental health care access and utilization. The current title suggests: Measurement of disparities across groups Statistical comparison of outcomes A quantitative or mixed-methods approach A qualitative study should seek to understand individuals’ experiences, perceptions or how they navigate mental health care access and use.

Supporting Literature

The first step in developing your prospectus is to search the literature related to the general area you want to investigate (see social problem below). In your review of recent, empirical literature, what keywords did you search and in what databases?

The keywords and databases searched included The key words searched and the databases used included racial/ethnic disparities, mental health care access, mental health service utilization, structural barriers, cultural barriers, technological barriers, African American OR Black, Hispanic OR Latino, Asian American, combined with Boolean operators (AND/OR) mental health treatment disparities. Only articles published between 2018 and 2026 that were peer reviewed and empirical were included. PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Web of Science and CINAHL were the main databases used for searches. Other searches were made in multi-disciplinary databases, including SAGE Journals and the JSTOR, to find social science views.. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Limit your range to 5 years and include seminal works associated with your theories where needed. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Watch punctuation

Provide at least 10 brief summaries of recent, scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles that support/justify a current and relevant problem in your discipline or professional field. Source(s) supporting your framework should be included. Include the complete, APA reference entry, followed by (a) an in-text citation; (b) what was studied; (c) what was found; and (d) why this research is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem.

Ma, Y., Ramos, C., Wen, H., & Cummings, J. R. (2025). Racial and ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents.  JAMA Network Open8(6), e2516612. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16612 Comment by Boone, Leggie: Watch your spacing. APA formatting requires reference list citations to be organized alphabetically. Number each of them or re-organize your format with indentations to show where one resource ends and another begins. Be consistent with the font and font size throughout.

(a) Ma et al. (2025); (b) This cross-sectional study examined racial/ethnic differences in mental health service utilization (visits, medications, telemental health) among 23,541 U.S. adolescents using national survey data; (c) found that racial/ethnic minority adolescents (Black, Hispanic, Asian) were significantly less likely to receive any mental health visits, outpatient care, or telemental health services compared to White adolescents; (d) this research is important to my study because it documents persistent post-pandemic disparities in access and utilization among youth, highlighting the need to examine structural, cultural, and technological barriers affecting minority populations.

Panchal, N., Hill, L., Artiga, S., & Hamel, L. (2024). Racial and ethnic disparities in mental health care: findings from the KFF survey of racism, discrimination and health.  Kaiser Fam Found, 1-13. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Write out the full name of the journal. I was not able to locate this article. Is there a DOI? Verification is needed. Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) reports are generally respected policy reports but are not typically peer-reviewed journal articles.

(a) Panchal et al. (2024); (b) Analyzed 2023 national survey data on mental health service receipt among adults reporting fair/poor mental health; (c) found White adults (50%) were more likely to receive services than Black (39%) and Hispanic (36%) adults, with additional barriers like stigma, cost, and lack of culturally congruent providers reported by minorities; (d) this is important to my study as it provides current evidence of disparities and identifies structural and cultural factors that my research will explore further.

Rodgers, C. R., Flores, M. W., Bassey, O., Augenblick, J. M., & Lê Cook, B. (2022). Racial/ethnic disparity trends in children’s mental health care access and expenditures from 2010-2017: Disparities remain despite sweeping policy reform.  Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry61(7), 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.09.420

(a) Rodgers et al. (2022); (b) important to my study because they analyzed trends in mental health service use among children using national data; (c) important to my study because they found that disparities in mental health service use among Black youth compared to White youth were increasing while the use of services was decreasing or stagnating for Black youth; (d) important to my study because they highlighted the long-term disparities that are present throughout childhood and into adolescence and the need to address them. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Edit phrasing. The description is too brief and doesn’t identify population, variables, or design. As you described what was found, you share use of service, but this could be more comprehensive. Comment by Boone, Leggie: I added a space to separate the reference grouping

Pervez, R., & Anjum, N. (2023). Systemic barriers and interventions in healthcare for underserved communities: An exploration of health disparities.  Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences1(2), 19-24. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0747-3369

(a) Pervez & Anjum (2023); (b) looked at the structural and institutional barriers that impact access to healthcare for populations that are underserved; (c) found that logistical, institutional and systemic inequities are significant factors that contribute to interrupted care; (d) relevant because this gives evidence for the structural inequities that I will examine in the mental health context. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Space added

McCleary-Gaddy, A. T., & James, D. (2024). Dehumanization, attitudes toward seeking professional psychological care, and mental health among African American women.  Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology30(1), 166. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/cdp0000554 Comment by Boone, Leggie: APA formatting. Page numbers and doi URL are not correct

(a) McCleary-Gaddy & James (2024); (b) examined how cultural identity, discrimination, and dehumanization influence mental health treatment-seeking among African American women; (c) mistrust and lack of culturally sensitive environments decrease help-seeking; (d) this is relevant to my study because it highlights cultural barriers central to racial/ethnic disparities. Comment by Boone, Leggie: You summarize the findings but need a little more detail to relate to your study. Added wording would help. For example: The researchers found that experiences of dehumanization and discrimination were associated with less favorable attitudes toward seeking professional psychological care, while mistrust of providers and the lack of culturally responsive mental health environments served as barriers to treatment-seeking.

Choi, S. W., Ramos, C., Kim, K., & Azim, S. F. (2019). The association of racial and ethnic social networks with mental health service utilization across minority groups in the USA.  Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities6(4), 836-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-019-00583-y

(a) Choi et al. (2019); (b) examined racial/ethnic group social networks and their influence on service use and depression diagnosis; (c) showed variations were associated with service use differences; (d) adds to cultural and community-level factors in research I want to do. Comment by Boone, Leggie: The resource is too old. The description is brief and lacks information about the population and variables examined regarding what was studied. Why the research is important is vaguely noted. Be specific.

Elliott, T. R., Choi, K. R., Elmore, J. G., & Dudovitz, R. (2024). Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of pediatric mental health care.  Academic Pediatrics24(6), 987-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.01.024

(a) Elliott et al. 2024; (b) examined inequities in mental health treatment utilization among children; (c) found that significant racial/ethnic disparities exist in access to mental health treatment; (d) general applicability of the issues across the ages. Comment by Boone, Leggie: What was studied needs more detail about the population and focus; what was found is overly general; Why the study is important is vague and does not appropriately respond. Avoid colloquialisms.

Cook, B. L., Rastegar, J., & Patel, N. (2024). Social risk factors and racial and ethnic disparities in health care resource utilization among Medicare advantage beneficiaries with psychiatric disorders.  Medical Care Research and Review81(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231222583

(a) Cook et al. (2024); (b) This study examined the intersection of social risk factors (e.g., housing instability, food insecurity) and racial/ethnic disparities in mental health service utilization using large-scale claims and survey data; (c) found that even after accounting for social risks, Black and Hispanic adults had significantly lower utilization rates than White adults; (d) this research is important to my study because it highlights how structural social determinants compound racial/ethnic disparities, supporting the need to examine multifaceted barriers. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Looks good

Breslau, J., Han, B., Levin, J. S., Lai, J., & Yu, H. (2024, March). Are disparities in mental health care for Medicaid beneficiaries lower in managed care?. In  Healthcare (Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 100734). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2024.100734 Comment by Boone, Leggie: APA formatting needs attention

(a) Breslau et al. (2024); (b) used Medicaid claims data to evaluate the trends of racial/ethnic disparities in mental health service use; (c) identified large and persistent disparities among Black and Hispanic beneficiaries despite insurance coverage, highlighting structural and cultural barriers; (d) relevant to my study because they found that disparities in mental health care access persist despite insurance coverage, which emphasizes structural and cultural barriers.

Fischer, M., Swint, J., Zhang, W., & Zhang, X. (2024). Mind the gap: Unraveling mental health disparities in America’s diverse landscape.  medRxiv, 2024-07. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.24311109 Comment by Boone, Leggie: medRxiv is a preprint repository, not a peer-reviewed journal. Identify a replacement resource.

(a) Fischer et al. (2024); (b) Conducted a systematic review of studies on mental health service utilization across racial/ethnic groups; (c) concluded that African American and Hispanic populations consistently show lower utilization rates due to systemic racism, stigma, and lack of culturally competent care; (d) this research strengthens the justification for my study by synthesizing evidence on the urgency and complexity of these disparities.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence, documentable discrepancies, and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

Problem

What was the social problem that prompted you to search the literature to find out more? Write in complete sentences using a scholarly tone.

The situation or issue that prompted me to search the literature is The problem or question that I would like to address in the literature is the racial/ethnic inequities in access to and utilization of mental health care services in the USA. Although there are similar or higher rates of mental health needs among racial and ethnic minority groups, compared to White individuals, they have very low rates of utilization of mental health services, especially Black, Hispanic, and Asian communities. For example, the percentage of adults who report fair or poor mental health who receive mental health services is significantly higher among White adults (50%) compared with Black (39%) and Hispanic (36%) adults. This inequity is not only seen between age groups but also among adolescents and children despite policy changes that have been instituted, such as the Affordable Care Act and increased insurance coverage. This inequity is due to structural barriers (e.g., cost, lack of insurance, systemic inequities), cultural factors (e.g., stigma, mistrust, and lack of culturally congruent providers), and technological challenges, leading to unmet mental health needs, poorer outcomes, and elevated long-term costs to society. Comment by Boone, Leggie: What Is Missing You should explicitly state: What is known Disparities exist. Structural and cultural barriers have been identified. What is not known How affected individuals perceive these barriers. How barriers influence decisions to seek care. How minority adults navigate mental health systems. Why qualitative inquiry is needed Existing research is largely quantitative. Lived experiences and perceptions remain insufficiently understood. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Consequences including unmet needs, poorer outcomes, and societal costs are identified. Racial and ethnic minority groups are identified, but the specific population for the proposed study is unclear. The statement describes what is known about disparities but does not identify what remains unknown. The focus remains on prevalence and disparities rather than understanding experiences and barriers. The rationale for exploring lived experiences, perceptions, or meanings is not explicitly stated.

Now that you have read and summarized some of the recent literature to understand your problem, and given what other researchers are exploring, what meaningful gap have you identified that your study will address? (What have others not yet explored about this problem that you will contribute with your study?)

Although researchers have investigated this issue, the topic has not been explored in this way: While many studies have documented racial and ethnic differences in mental health care access and use, few studies have systematically explored the intersectionality of structural, cultural, and technological barriers on a single integrated framework. Comment by Boone, Leggie: The prospectus gap should answer three questions: What is already known? What remains unknown? How will your study address that unknown? A qualitative study should usually explore experiences, perceptions, meanings, or processes. The current gap could be addressed through another quantitative study.

Based on all of the above information (social problem, literature review, gap), in one sentence, what is your research problem ?

The specific research problem that will be addressed through this study is The research problem that this study will address is the lack of understanding of the role structural, cultural, and technological barriers play in the persistence of racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care access and utilization in the United States. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Your research statement would be stronger if it explicitly emphasized the lack of understanding from the perspective of those experiencing the phenomenon. For a qualitative dissertation, wording that highlights experiences, perceptions, or meanings rather than the "role" of factors is needed.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified? In other words, is addressing this problem the logical next step, given the previous exploratory and confirmatory research (or lack thereof) on this topic? It is not acceptable to simply replicate previous research for a Ph.D. degree.

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution? The problem must be an authentic "puzzle" that needs solving, not merely a topic that the researcher finds interesting. Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field or discipline.

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Complete the purpose sentence below and be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest.

The purpose of this Qualitative study is to The aim of this qualitative study is to examine the interrelated role of structural, cultural and technological barriers in racial and ethnic inequalities in access to and utilization of mental health care in the U.S. context. Comment by Boone, Leggie: In qualitative research, words such as examine the role can sound more quantitative or explanatory. A qualitative purpose statement typically focuses on understanding experiences, perceptions, meanings, or interpretations. Examine the role" is not strongly qualitative. Racial and ethnic minority adults are not specified. A purpose statement expressing a phenomenological design is strong: Example: The purpose of this qualitative phenomenological study is to explore the lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority adults regarding structural, cultural, and technological barriers that influence access to and utilization of mental health care services in the United States.

Framework (Conceptual or Theoretical)

What theory(ies) and/or concept(s) support (frame) your study and who are the original authors? Provide an in-text citation with your response, and the complete APA reference entry with summary in the Supporting Literature section.

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include The theories and/or concepts that underlie this study are Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and the intersectionality concept. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Information about the authors of the theories is needed. Andersen's model does not explicitly categorize culture as a predisposing factor or technology as an enabling factor in the way your statement suggests. Rather, the model broadly examines how predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics influence health service utilization. Include appropriate citations. Any author-related resource related to the development of the theories needs to also appear in your literature section with the a, b, c, and d completed. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use Original author: Ronald M. Andersen Common citation: Andersen (1995) Intersectionality Original author: Kimberlé Crenshaw Foundational citation: Crenshaw (1989) The phrase: "Intersectionality adds to this model..."would be stronger if it explained that intersectionality helps reveal how multiple social identities and systems of oppression shape experiences of barriers and access.

How do these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study?

The logical connections between the framework presented and the nature of my study include The logical links between the framework presented and the nature of my study are Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, which introduces a structure for examining the relationship between the predisposing (cultural), enabling (structural and technological) and need factors that influence the use of mental health services among racial/ethnic minorities. Intersectionality adds to this model by emphasizing the intersectionality of overlapping social identities (race, ethnicity, gender, etc.) aggravating these barriers. These are used in tandem to provide the qualitative look into the interrelated barriers that led to the identified disparities.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical base or conceptual framework. Although many approaches can ground a study in the scientific literature, the essential requirement is that the problem is framed such that the new findings will have implications for the previous findings.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the question(s) that you plan to use to address the research problem. Your question(s) must align with your study purpose and include the variables and/or concepts and how they will be examined.

What is the impact of the combined effect of structural, cultural and technological barriers on the access to and use of mental health care services for racial/ethnic minority people in the United States? Comment by Boone, Leggie: The research question aligns with the topic and concepts of interest, but it is not aligned with a qualitative study because it asks about the "impact" of barriers, which implies causation or effect and is more consistent with a quantitative design. The purpose is to explore experiences/perceptions. Qualitative research typically asks: How do participants experience...? How do participants perceive...? What are the experiences of...? How do participants describe...? What meanings do participants attribute to...?

Nature of the Study

What systematic approach/method and research design do you plan to use to address your research question(s)?

To address the research questions in this Qualitative study, the specific research design will include The specific research design for this qualitative study will be a basic qualitative design with semi-structured interviews to investigate the lived experiences of the participants with structural, cultural and technological barriers to mental health care. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Alignment and methodological issues The phrase "lived experiences" is associated with phenomenology, not a generic/basic qualitative design. Option 1: Basic Qualitative Study Focus on: perceptions perspectives understandings experiences Avoid: lived experiences essence of experience Option 2: Phenomenological Study Focus on: lived experiences essence of the phenomenon phenomenological analysis Currently, your problem, purpose, gap, and research question suggest that either design could work, but your wording is mixing the two approaches.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025).  Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

For your planned research design, what type of data will you need and what data collection instruments will provide it?

For my planned research design, I will need My proposed research design involves gathering primary qualitative data with semi-structured interviews with adults of racial and ethnic minority backgrounds with barriers to mental health care services. A semi-structured interview guide developed by the researcher will be the main data collection tool.

What data sources and analysis do you plan to use to answer your research question(s)?

Purposive sampling of adults aged 12–15 of racial and ethnic minority groups (black, Hispanic, and Asian) who have had difficulties accessing and/or using mental health care services will be used as a data source. The data will be gathered using semi-structured interviews with an audio recording. Data analysis will be conducted using the six stages of thematic analysis, which are familiarization with the data, initial coding, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining themes and reporting. Comment by Boone, Leggie: "adults aged 12–15" This is a contradiction. Individuals aged 12–15 are adolescents/minors, not adults. IRB FLAG Since your purpose statement references racial and ethnic minority adults, your sampling strategy must match.

What limitations, challenges, and/or barriers might you need to address while conducting this study (e.g., access to participants, access to data, requirements for storing data, separation of roles or other ethical considerations, instrumentation fees, etc.)?

Some challenges faced may include a lack of participants from racial and ethnic minority groups because of mistrust of research and healthcare systems in the past, and the need to maintain confidentiality and avoid emotionally triggering discussions about sensitive mental health experiences. Other factors include obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and dealing with the time spent on transcription and thematic analysis. Comment by Boone, Leggie: Specify anticipated sample size (e.g., 10–15 or 12–20 participants)

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry and has selected an approach that has potential to address the problem.

Significance

How will your study address the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change?

This study is significant in that It is important in this study to help further understand how the structural, cultural and technological barriers all play a role in racial and ethnic disparities in access and utilization of mental health care. The results can provide information to develop culturally responsive interventions, policies, and practices to address these disparities. The findings of this study can help reduce disparities in access to mental health services and improve the mental health status of racial/ethnic minority groups while promoting positive social change. Comment by Boone, Leggie: You explain why the study is important and address barriers and disparities, but the contribution is implied but not explicitly stated. Be more specific about interventions and policies. The current statement focuses primarily on what the findings might be used for, but it does not clearly state: What new knowledge the study will contribute. How qualitative findings will fill the identified gap. Who specifically may benefit (mental health providers, policymakers, community organizations, minority populations, etc.).

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? As described in the Significance section, the anticipated findings have potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present a foregone conclusion. Even if the researcher has a strong opinion on the expected findings, the researcher must maximize scholarly objectivity by framing the problem in the context of a systematic inquiry that permits multiple possible conclusions.

Partner Site Masking Self-Check

Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance).

☒ Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest.

☐ If you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization.

Research Design Alignment Table

Hover over bold font for Instructions and click links for resources. |

Instructions | Quantitative Example Table | Qualitative Example Table

Research Design Alignment Table Video Tutorial (YouTube) | Doctoral Research Design Alignment Appointments or Office Hours

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The problem this study will solve is that many racial and ethnic groups in the United States continue to have unequal access to and participation in mental health care due to a lack of understanding within the United States about the role that the barriers to obtaining mental health care services, which are structural, cultural and technological, play. Comment by Boone, Leggie: The purpose of the study is not to solve the problem, but to present factual support that the problem exists and to contribute new knowledge that helps researchers, practitioners, policymakers, or organizations better understand the problem and potentially address it more effectively.

Purpose: This is a qualitative study to investigate the interplay of structural, cultural, and technological barriers to mental health access and utilization that could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the United States.

Framework: Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and the concepts of intersectionality underlie this study.

RQ1: What are the complex, multifaceted roles of structural, cultural, and technological barriers in impacting racial and ethnic minority individuals' access to and use of mental health care services in the U.S.?

Method: Qualitative

Design: Basic qualitative design Comment by Boone, Leggie: Make sure to align your design throughout- basic qualitative or phenomenological (and which type of phenomenological)

Primary qualitative data gathered by means of semi-structured interview. Primary data collection will be based on a researcher designed semi-structured interview guide.

Purposive sampling of 12-15 people of color (Black, Hispanic, and Asian) adults with difficulties accessing or using mental health care services.

Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis approach

RQ2: Replace text with response.

Method: Choose method

Design: Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

RQ3: Replace text with response.

Method: Choose method

Design: Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Replace text with response.

Note. The information in the first column must align with all rows, and each individual RQ row must show alignment across the columns for that row.

Once your Research Design Alignment Table is completed, reflect on your design alignment. Ask yourself:

Is there a logical progression from the research problem to the purpose of the study?

Does the identified framework ground the investigation into the stated problem?

Do the problem, purpose, and framework in the left-hand column align with the RQ(s) (all rows)?

Does each RQ address the problem and align with the purpose of the study?

Does the information across each individual row match/align with the RQ listed for that row?

By row, will the variables listed address the RQ?

By row, will the analysis address the RQ?

By row, can the analysis be completed with the data points that will be collected?

Rubric Standard | Aligned > Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? The nature of the study should align with the problem, research questions, and tentative approaches to inquiry.

Appendix

The Doctoral Prospectus

The Doctoral Prospectus is a brief document that provides preliminary information about your dissertation research and is used in two ways:

It serves as the tentative plan for developing the proposal and is evaluated to ensure doctoral-level work (e.g., feasibility, alignment, etc.).

It provides information used to assign the committee University Research Reviewer.

Prospectus milestone approval from the committee chair, second committee member, and a program-level designee is required for you to move forward and work on your proposal. The plan is subject to change, and parts of your research design may need to be adjusted after you complete your exhaustive review of the literature during proposal development.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Title

Titles should be concise (aim for 15 words or fewer), be a statement, not a question, and no colons please. The title should indicate the main topic and the variables/concepts under study and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and include the most critical key words (a searchable statement of what the manuscript contains). Avoid words that serve no purpose (such as methods, results, a study of..., or investigation of...), use full terms (avoid abbreviations), and capitalize any word of four or more letters, and all parts of a verb. For more information, see the F&S Checklist.

Quantitative (QN) Example

Differences in the Quality of Problem Statements Written Throughout the Capstone

Qualitative (QL) Example

How Online Doctoral Students Develop a Dissertation Problem Statement

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Background Literature

Probably the most important step in the research process is searching recent, peer-reviewed literature and reading articles related to the general area you want to investigate. The area is based on an identified social problem. As you read and learn, you will narrow your focus. This is how you will identify a discipline-specific research problem.

[ Note: Scholarly, empirical articles and how to find them.]

First, you’ll need to determine your search terms or keywords and the databases you should search. As you conduct your search of the literature, stay organized by keeping a search log.

Search Log Example

Database

Search Terms

Results

Notes

Education Source

online doctoral program completion; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

1175

Search too broad; Narrow by using multiple terms

ERIC

online doctoral program completion AND ABD; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present

13

Much better; Several relevant articles found

Etc.

Example for this Form

The keywords and databases searched included ABD , online doctoral program completion, doctoral capstone completion, online research training, and online learning in the databases Education Source, ERIC, and SAGE Journals, as well as in a multidatabase search.

As you read and evaluate literature, you also need to organize your research. A literature review matrix is one way to help you visualize what has and hasn't been done in your field. It will help you understand the scholarly works related to your area of interest. The importance of organizing and recording your review of literature cannot be overstated. You will refer to your notes as you write, so start on the right track from the beginning!

[ Suggestion: If you keep your search log in an Excel workbook, use the second tab in the same workbook for your literature review matrix.]

For this form, include the complete, APA reference entry and (a) an in-text citation; (b) what they studied; (c) what they found; and (d) why this is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem. These sources provide justification that this problem is meaningful to the discipline or professional field. These references should ideally be from the past 5 years. Reference entries related to the framework should be included here, too. [ Note: During proposal development, you will conduct an exhaustive review and synthesize your sources, rather than summarize.]

Example (for one article; at least 10 are required)

Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078

(a) Ismail, Majid, and Ismail (2013); (b) focused on the student experience with supervision while learning to conduct research; (c) found three issues of lack of positive communication, lack of expertise, and power conflicts; and (d) this is important in relation to my study because it may help explain progress on the development of a problem statement in the capstone process.

Rubric Standard | Justified > Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Problem

Social Problem

The situation or issue being experienced by a population or within your discipline that prompted you to search the literature to find out more is sometimes called a social problem. It is the issue that students see “on the ground” so to speak. The social problem is often what prompts students to think about a topic of interest. Usually such a topic is one that students identify with, sometimes having personally experienced some aspect of the problem as it exists in the world.

Example Social Problem

The issue that prompted me to search the literature is the low completion rate of students in doctoral programs. It is common knowledge in the education discipline that only about half of the students who enter doctoral programs will complete, and the lack of progress is often due to the dissertation process. A search in The Chronicle of Higher Education will result in numerous articles about supporting doctoral students with their capstone research to improve the completion rates of doctoral programs.

Gap

The need to address an identified gap in the research literature must be clear and there must be current relevance to the discipline and area of practice. Keep in mind that a gap in the research is not, in and of itself, a reason to conduct research. The gap relates to the rubric standard: Meaningful.

Example Gap

Although researchers have investigated this issue, there is very little or no literature on the development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs.

Research Problem

A research problem is a focused topic of concern, a condition to be improved upon, or troubling question that is supported in scholarly literature or theory that you study to understand in more detail, and that can lead to recommendations for resolutions. It is the research problem that drives the rest of the dissertation: the purpose, the research questions, and the methodology.

QN Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

QL Example of Research Problem

In one sentence, the specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Rubric Standard | Meaningful > Has a meaningful problem and gap in the research literature been identified?

Rubric Standard | Original > Does this project have potential to make an original contribution?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest. For example:

In quantitative studies, state what needs be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem.

In qualitative studies, describe the need for increased understanding about the issue to be studied, based on the identified gap or problem.

In mixed-methods studies, with both quantitative and qualitative aspects, clarify how the two approaches will be used together to inform the study.

QN Example of Purpose

The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral study development.

QL Example of Purpose

The purpose of this qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Framework

The framework includes the theories and/or concepts relevant to your topic. Align the framework with the problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. This theoretical or conceptual framework is the basis for understanding, designing, and analyzing ways to investigate your research problem (data collection and analysis). Provide the original scholarly literature (citing original authors) on the theory and/or concepts, even if it is more than 5 years old. Please do not cite secondary sources.

Example Theoretical Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

Example Conceptual Framework

The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

Next, explain how these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and the nature of your study. Your topic/approach should align with the identified framework so that you will either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic.

Example Connection for the Theoretical Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. The approach provides details on cognitive-structural changes that emerge as a result of development and learning.

Example Connection for the Conceptual Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. Further, subsequent research and application of Perry’s theory offer guidance on ways to facilitate academic development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical challenge of the dissertation.

Rubric Standard | Grounded > Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the overarching question and/or a series of related questions that are informed by the study purpose, that will be used to address the research problem. A research question informs the research design by providing a foundation for:

generation of null and alternative hypotheses in quantitative studies,

questions necessary to build the design structure for qualitative studies, and

a process by which different methods will work together in mixed-methods studies.

QN Example RQs and Hypotheses

Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

H 01—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are no statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

H 1—Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, there are statistically significant differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students progress through the doctoral study process.

QL Example RQ

For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Nature of the Study

Explain the systematic approach/method and research design you plan to use to address your research question(s). Examples of study design are as follows:

Quantitative—for experimental, quasiexperimental, or nonexperimental designs; treatment-control; repeated measures; causal-comparative; single-subject; predictive studies; or other quantitative approaches

Qualitative—for basic/generic qualitative design, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, narrative inquiry, phenomenological research, policy analysis, or other qualitative traditions

Mixed methods, primarily quantitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on quantitative methods

Mixed methods, primarily qualitative—for sequential, concurrent, or transformative studies, with the focus on qualitative methods

Other—for another design, to be specified with a justification provided for its use

QN Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this quantitative study, the specific research design will include a repeated-measures design (Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias, 2008) with objective ratings of student work products examined across time. This quantitative analysis should help pinpoint the amount of growth from the beginning to the end of the project.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences cd-rom  spss cd-rom vol 15. (7th ed.). Worth Pub.

QL Example for Nature of the Study

To address the research questions in this qualitative study, the specific research design will include a basic quality study and analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding.

Reference entry for the work on which this research design is based:

Saldaña J. (2016).  The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.

Then, for your planned research design, present the type of data you will need, and a list of possible data collection instruments that could be used to address the proposed research question(s). At this point, you should have an idea of the type of data needed to address your research question(s). Explain whether you will be collecting primary data (collected by the you, the researcher) or accessing secondary data (preexisting or public data collected by others). Possible secondary data sources, by program, are available on the Office of Research and Doctoral Services website. [ Note. This is your tentative plan, so keep in mind that things might need to be modified during the proposal stage—particularly after you have completed your exhaustive review of the literature.]

Type of Data (From IRB Form A): Interviews, focus groups, questionnaires/surveys that I administer; public records or documents; private records or documents (released by a school, clinic, business, or other entity); observations in public; observation in non-public spaces; other

Data Collection Instruments: Survey or questionnaire that I will create (not for measuring constructs); survey or questionnaire developed by others—provide specific name of instrument; researcher-created interview guide; observation guide, document review guide .

QN Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

QL Example Type of Data and Data Collection Instruments

For my planned research design, I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

Next, provide the data sources and analysis you plan to use to answer your research question(s).

Data Sources: For existing data, list the specific databases that are the data sources; For data the researcher will collect, list the specific criteria for participants and ideas about how you will recruit them.

Data Analysis: For quantitative, provide variables, scales of measurement, and statistical analysis. For qualitative, Provide specific methods for qualitative data analysis.

QN Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

QL Example for Data Sources and Analysis

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldana’s (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

Finally, provide information on limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to participants, access to data, separation of roles (researcher versus employee), instrumentation fees, etc. If you are thinking about collecting data on a sensitive topic or from a vulnerable population, an early consultation with the Institutional Review Board (IRB; [email protected]) during your prospectus process is recommended to gain ethics guidance that you can incorporate into your subsequent proposal drafts and research planning. [ Note. Find more information on research ethics and potential “red flag” issues on the IRB Guides and FAQs.]

QN Example

A potential barrier when using secondary data is that data access will probably include a partner-site agreement and potentially an external research ethics review (IRB), which may take some additional time. A possible barrier for collecting survey data is difficulty in recruitment of participants. I will attend IRB Office Hours to ask questions about these issues.

QL Example

A potential barrier when collecting primary data include partner site agreement and possible difficulty recruiting participants for interviews. Ensuring clear separation of my role at the institution from my role as researcher may also be a challenge.

Rubric Standard | Feasible > Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

Significance

Here you explain how your study addresses the meaningful, discipline-specific issue that you identified and will therefore contribute to your field, discipline, professional practice, etc. contributing to positive social change. Detail how your findings might support professional practice or allow practical application (answer the So what? question).

Example Significance

This study is significant in that it will fill a gap in understanding by focusing specifically on development of problem statements by students in online doctoral programs. The results of this study should aid doctoral committees and academic programs in helping students to succeed in their final projects, thus supporting eventual degree attainment. Education has long been a force for social change by addressing inequities in society. Because a broad range of students attends online institutions, supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased diversity among individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.

Rubric Standard | Impact > Does this project have potential to affect positive social change?

Rubric Standard | Objective > Is the topic approached in an objective manner?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

My Doctoral Research ( MyDR)

If you have not done so already, you should familiarize yourself with the My DR system. The MyDR system was designed to assist you and your committee in navigating your doctoral research journey, from the very beginning through the final approval. The various landing pages in MyDR will track your progress and will serve as a central location for resources to support that progress. There is a process flow tool in which you exchange and store faculty evaluations of and feedback on your work as you progress along that journey.

You will be entered into the MyDR system when both your committee chair and second member nominees are approved by the academic program. At that point, you will be able to access MyDR from the homepage of your dissertation completion course in Blackboard. The first document that you will submit for approval in MyDR will be your prospectus.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

QN Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that it is not known whether the quality of problem statements written by online doctoral students varies over time in the program.

Purpose: The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine differences in the quality of problem statements written by doctoral students in online programs during the various stages of their doctoral studies.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

RQ1: Based on objective ratings by doctoral faculty, what are the differences in the overall quality of problem statements as students move through the doctoral study stages?

Method: Quantitative

Design: A repeated-measures design

I will need to utilize secondary data (private records released by a school); therefore, I will not be using any data collection instrument.

I will request access to preexisting/secondary data from the W University’s online doctoral program. The program collects and rates doctoral problem statements written at four key points in a doctoral student’s career: the premise, the prospectus, the proposal, and the final study. The data will be deidentified and contain the scores by stage of program for 300 online doctoral students.

Variables: IV = Time (capstone stage with 4 categories-premise, prospectus, proposal, final study); DV = numeric rating

Scales of Measurement: IV = nominal; DV = interval/ratio

Analysis: one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

QL Sample Research Design Alignment Table

Research

Problem, Purpose, and Framework

Research Question(s), Method, & Design

Types of Data to be Collected and Data Collection

Instruments

Data

Sources

Data

Analysis

Problem: The specific research problem is that there is a lack of understanding about how online doctoral students go about developing their research problem statement for their dissertations.

Purpose: The purpose of this basic qualitative study is to improve the understanding of the process by which doctoral students in online programs arrive at a viable problem statement for their dissertations.

Framework: The theories and/or concepts that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

RQ1: For students with a high-quality problem statement at the final dissertation stage, what was the process that they used to develop it?

Method: Qualitative

Design: basic qualitative

I will need to recruit both student and faculty participants for individual interviews. Interview protocols will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.

I will recruit 12 faculty and 12 students from an online forum for doctoral programs. Inclusion criteria for faculty include mentoring at least one dissertation student through graduation, mentoring at least 5 dissertation students overall. Inclusion criteria for students include having a high-quality problem statement and IRB approval, but not past graduation.

The data analysis will follow Saldañas (2016) descriptive coding process and use first and second cycle coding. Descriptive coding is used to assign labels to words or phrases in the data. First and second cycle coding means that the data are reviewed more than once using one or more types of coding. Codes will be categorized, which means synthesizing the codes into consolidated meaning. Categories will be moved into themes, which are phrases or sentences that describe a process derived from the categories.

RQ2:

Method:

Design:

RQ3:

Method:

Design:

image1.png