2.5 page Leadership research paper

1. What kind of qualitative research this article uses?

The kind of qualitative research which the article uses is archival data. Archival data entails information which is already in existence. It is initially generated for the purpose of the study. Archival evidence is frequently reserved for reference and is generally the result of a completed activity (Corley, 2006). Archival data is not subject to changes. Archival data is essential in qualitative research as it establishes a standard of assessment against which a researcher measures his or her efforts, to identify the existing drifts which might influence the outcome of an analysis, to establish a basis for the measure of the study outcomes, and to create a better understanding of the context of an evaluation.

2. How was the research conducted?

The research in the article was carried out through the use of case study research. Case study entails an analysis of projects, decisions, events, policies, in addition to other systems which are studied thoroughly by one or various methods (Morgan, 2017). Case studies can be explanatory or descriptive. Case studies are a highly flexible type of research method (Corley, 2006). They may employ all or any methods of collecting data. Case studies provide a thorough analysis of a specific test subject. Data is gathered from numerous sources and assembled using the information to develop a significant conclusion.

3. What conclusions were drawn from this research?

Qualitative research methods overcome the primary limitation of numerous methods of quantitative research which entails the lack of the ability to develop theory. The increase in the use of many techniques is necessary for the building of generalizable, practical, and accurate useful approach within an integrated complex field such as the management research (Corley, 2006). The combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods results in the advantage of forming a more comprehensive image of an occurrence which far outweighs the costs of effort and time. There have been various successful illustrations for combining quantitative and qualitative methods. For instance, beginning research with a qualitative approach to creating an initial hypothetical framework and afterwards using a quantitative approach to extend and test that hypothesis (Morgan, 2017).

In some cases a qualitative inquiry may also follow a quantitative analysis (Corley, 2006). This can mostly be useful in a case whereby a researcher desires to expound on the existence of an unanticipated pattern within data or in a situation where a researcher attempts to find a mechanism which creates an unexpected pattern. An example of this can be found in research involving the analysis of emotional displays, the researcher began with a quantitative testing theory and afterwards carried out an examination on qualitative data to create a better understanding of the information (Morgan, 2017). Nevertheless, the implementation of the fusion of quantitative and qualitative research as a methodological strategy requires researchers organizations to be more comfortable and familiar with epistemological, methodological, and ontological basis of both quantitative and qualitative analysis. This strategy requires some re-education as the methodological repertoires go through expansion past the safety of the preferred perspective since it is not a norm for any individuals (Morgan, 2017).

4. How does this research influence your thinking in solving your current issue or problem?

This research has influenced my thinking in solving my current problem of evaluating the effectiveness of emotional intelligence in leaders by providing greater insight on how I can combine the implementation of qualitative and quantitative strategies to develop both formal and substantive theory either through the extension of current concepts or through the formation of novel approaches (Corley, 2006). The article has also enlightened me on numerous advantages of the combination of rigorous qualitative and quantitative research which presents a powerful strategy for researchers to utilize.

References

Corley, S. K. (2006). Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide. Journal of Management Studies, 1-16. Morgan, D. L. (2017). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods : a pragmatic approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.