CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
jaydenson
wk10pathoassignCASESTUDYANALYSIS.docxCASE STUDY ANALYSIS
An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient.
Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.
An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in systems based on these characteristics is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.
In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10
Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site. ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1-2 page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study. Discuss the primary pathophysiological processes and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. |
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response discusses the primary pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in detail. The pathophysiology is accurate and responses show in depth critical thinking. 27 to >24.0 ptsGoodThe response discusses the primary pathophysiological processes, significance for symptom development and the diagnosis in some detail. The pathophysiology is accurate and the responses show come critical thinking. 24 to >22.0 ptsFairThe response discusses the primary pathophysiological processes, significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence or research. 22 to >0 ptsPoorThe response discusses the primary pathophysiological processes, the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and/or inaccurate or the description is missing. The response does not include rationales, has vague explanations or is based on inappropriate or no evidence or research. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the role genetic mutations play in the development of the disease and the risk factors that make the patient more susceptible to the disease. |
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed and specific analysis of the genes/risk factors that are associated with the development of the disease. 27 to >24.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate analysis of the genetics and risk factors that may be associated with the development of the disease. Response does not fully address all factors. 24 to >22.0 ptsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genetics/risk factors that are associated with the development of the disease. 22 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genetics/risk factors that are associated with the development of the disease and/or portions are missing. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of the disease process. |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. Explain factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of the disease. Content is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. Explains factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of the disease. Content is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. A vague or inaccurate explanation of factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of the disease and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. A vague or inaccurate explanation of factors in the patient's history and lifestyle that could have contributed to the development of the disease, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by at least 3 current evidence-based sources. Body of paper is no more than 2 pages in length. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Content is supported by 3 current evidence-based sources which have been submitted with the assignment. Body of the paper is no more than 2 pages in length. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Some content is supported by 3 current evidence-based sources. Body of paper is no more than 2 pages. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity and clarity 60%-79% of the time. Some content is supported by at least 2 current evidence-based sources. Body of paper is longer than 2 pages. 2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No content is supported by current evidence-based sources. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 100
