Wk 10 Assign

profileJlm1128
WK10AssgnRubric.docx
Home>Applied Sciences homework help>Wk 10 Assign

NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:·   Planning and requirements definition·   Analysis·   Design of the new system·   Implementation·   Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis· Design of the new system

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Implementation· Post-implementation support

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100