|
NURS_8201_Week6_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix. Provide the correlation value and the names of variables.
|
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly describes in detail the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix.... The response includes an accurate and clear correlation value and the names of variables for both the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix.
|
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
The response accurately describes the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix.... The response includes an accurate correlation value and the names of variables for both the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix.
|
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix. ... OR ... The response omits either the strongest or weakest correlation. ... The response includes inaccurate or vague correlation value and the names of variables for both the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix.... OR ... The response omits the correlation value and/or the names of variables for either the strongest or weakest correlation.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix, or it is missing.... The response includes an inaccurate and vague correlation value and the names of variables for both the strongest and weakest correlation in the matrix, or it is missing.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how many original correlations are present in the matrix.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, how many original correlations are present in the matrix.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how many original correlations are present in the matrix.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how many original correlations are present in the matrix.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how many original correlations are present in the matrix, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain what the entry of 1.00 indicates on the diagonal of the matrix.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail what the entry of 1.00 indicates on the diagonal of the matrix.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains what the entry of 1.00 indicates on the diagonal of the matrix.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what the entry of 1.00 indicates on the diagonal of the matrix.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what the entry of 1.00 indicates on the diagonal of the matrix, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIndicate the strength and direction of the relationship between body mass index and physical component subscale.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly indicates, in detail, the strength and direction of the relationship between body mass index and physical component subscale.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between body mass index and physical component subscale.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between body mass index and physical component subscale.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between body mass index and physical component subscale, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain which variable is most strongly correlated with BMI. Explain the correlational coefficient and the sample size for this relationship.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail which variable is most strongly corrected with BMI.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the correlational coefficient and the sample size for this relationship.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains which variable is most strongly corrected with BMI.... The response accurately explains the correlational coefficient and the sample size for this relationship.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains which variable is most strongly corrected with BMI.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the correlational coefficient and the sample size for this relationship.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains which variable is most strongly corrected with BMI, or it is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the correlational coefficient and the sample size for this relationship, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the mean and standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the mean and standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains the mean and standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the mean and standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits.... OR... The response omits the mean or standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the mean and standard deviation for BMI and doctor visits, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the mean and standard deviation for weight and BMI. Describe the strength and direction of the relationship between weight and BMI.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the mean and standard deviation for weight and BMI.... The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the strength and direction of the relationship between weight and BMI.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains the mean and standard deviation for weight and BMI.... The response accurately explains the strength and direction of the relationship between weight and BMI.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the mean and standard deviation for weight and BMI.... OR... The response omits weight or BMI. ... OR ... The response omits the mean or standard deviation. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the strength and direction of the relationship between weight and BMI.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the mean and standard deviation for weight and BMI, or it is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the strength and direction of the relationship between weight and BMI, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the scatterplot. Explain what information it provides to the researcher.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly describes the scatterplot in detail.... The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, what information the scatterplot provides to the researcher.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response accurately describes the scatterplot.... The response accurately explains what information the scatterplot provides to the researcher.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the scatterplot.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what information the scatterplot provides to the researcher.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the scatterplot, or it is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what information the scatterplot provides to the researcher, or it is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Tinacherry100$
wk.6.Rubric.docx
