Evidence-Based Practice

profileTinacherry100$
wk.5.IDENTIFYSEARCHSTRATEGY.docx

IDENTIFY SEARCH STRATEGY

A diagram of a flowchart  Description automatically generated

How will you find the necessary evidence for your practice problem? If you are exploring sources outside of “typical” avenues, how do you know where to look?   

Understanding where and how to search for evidence is an important first step in exploring sources. A search strategy can benefit your search efforts by providing a necessary framework to begin. As a nurse leader, developing strategy—in this instance a search strategy—can demonstrate your leadership skills as you work to support a practice change that addresses a practice problem.

For this Assignment, consider the importance of developing a search strategy to find the necessary evidence for your practice problem. How might this development of a search strategy connect to your leadership strategies and styles? Consider the importance of search exploration for finding the necessary evidence for your practice problem.  

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).  Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 5, “Searching for Evidence” (pp. 99–120) 

· Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021).  Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 2, “The Nature of Evidence as a Basis for Evaluation” (pp. 37–64)

· Chapter 3, “Models for Evaluation in Advanced Nursing Practice” (pp. 65–92)

· Benson, L. A. (2021).  Chapter 14: The DNP degree: A fundamental requirement for the chief nursing offer.   The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack.

· Benson, L. A. (2021).  Chapter 15: Leaders, change agents: The unique contributions of a DNP-prepared nurse executive.   The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack. 

· Benson, L. A. (2021).  Chapter 16: Aligning DNP practice with the mission and strategic priority of the organization.   The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack. 

· Foster, M., Shurtz, S., & Smith, M. L. (2014).  Translating research into practice: Criteria for applying literature search results to your workLinks to an external site. Health Promotion Practice15(2), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839913511628

· Haas, M., & Mortensen, M. (2016).  The secrets of great teamwork.Links to an external site.   Harvard Business Review,  94(6), 70–76. https://hbr.org/2016/06/the-secrets-of-great-teamwork

· Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018).  Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational changeLinks to an external site. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge3(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002

· Jones, E. P., Brennan, E. A., & Davis, A. (2020).  Evaluation of literature searching and article selection skills of an evidence-based practice teamLinks to an external site. Journal of the Medical Library Association108(3), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.865

· Merner, B., Lowe, D., Walsh, L., Synnot, A., Stratil, J., Lewin, S., Glenton, C., von Philipsborn, P., Schonfeld, L., Ryan, R., O’Connor, D., Hoving, J. L., & Hill, S. (2021).  American Journal of Public Health Links to an external site. 111(7), 1210–1215. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306252

· Smith, L. W. (2000).  Stakeholder analysis: A pivotal practice of successful projectsLinks to an external site. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/stakeholder-analysis-pivotal-practice-projects-8905

TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources covering source exploration.

· Explore search strategies to determine what will work best for your problem.

· Consider the connection between source exploration, search strategies, and leadership styles. 

THE ASSIGNMENT: (1–2 PAGES)

Construct a short paper in which you identify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for your practice problem. Why did you select this search strategy, and how will this strategy be most beneficial for the problem? How did your role as leader assist you in making this decision? Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at  https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site. ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Submit your Assignment  by  Day 7 of Week 5.

Rubric

NURS_8502_Week5_Assignment4_Rubric

NURS_8502_Week5_Assignment4_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for the problem.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why you selected the search strategy.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly explains the selection of the search strategy. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection process.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response clearly explains the selection of the search strategy. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection process.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection process.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection process, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify why the search strategy is the most beneficial for the identified problem.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and fully justifies the use of the selected search strategy. ... The response comprehensively and clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the use of the search strategy.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response clearly justifies the use of the selected search strategy. ... The response clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the use of the search strategy.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the use of the search strategy.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy, or it is missing. ... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support use of the search strategy, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your role as a leader assisted in your search strategy decision.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg