Research for Evidence Based Practice

Tinacherry100$

wk.5.assign.rubric.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >Research for Evidence Based Practice

Rubric

NURS_8201_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8201_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize your interpretation of the ANOVA statistics provided in the Week 5 ANOVA Exercises SPSS Output document.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly summarizes, in detail, the ANOVA statistics provided.... An accurate and detailed explanation of the p-value describing whether the differences are statistically significant is provided.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response accurately summarizes the ANOVA statistics provided.... An accurate explanation of the p-value describing whether the differences are statistically significant is provided.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the ANOVA statistics provided.... An inaccurate or vague explanation of the p-value describing whether the differences are statistically significant is provided.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the ANOVA statistics provided, or itis missing.... An inaccurate and vague explanation of the p-value describing whether the differences are statistically significant is provided, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBe sure to evaluate each of the results presented (descriptives, ANOVA results, and multiple comparisons).

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly evaluates, in detail, each of the results presented in the document (descriptives, ANOVA results, and multiple comparisons).

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The response accurately evaluates each of the results presented in the document (descriptives, ANOVA results, and multiple comparisons).

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the results presented in the document (descriptives, ANOVA results, and multiple comparisons).... OR... The response summarizes < 3 of the results provided.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the results presented in the document (descriptives, ANOVA results, and multiple comparisons), or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100