Best, best
msgbemmy
WindshieldRubric.docx|
Criteria |
Omitted |
Unsatisfactory |
Progressing |
Satisfactory |
Exemplary |
|
Content |
Project does not address any of the required material.
|
Project fails to address much of the required material of the assignment. |
Project covers some required material for the assignment. 5 elements covered |
Project covers most required material for the assignment. 10 elements covered |
Project covers all required material for the assignment. 15 elements covered |
|
|
0 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
|
Critical thinking |
Analysis, logic, and critical thinking are absent |
Analysis, logic, and critical thinking are ineffective and incomplete. |
Analysis, logic, and critical thinking are somewhat effective and complete.
|
Analysis, logic, and critical thinking are mostly effective and complete.
|
Analysis, logic, and critical thinking are effective and complete, demonstrating depth, clarity, and understanding. |
|
|
0 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
|
Organization
|
Organization is not evident for this assignment. |
Organization is not appropriate for this assignment. |
Major breakdown between ideas introduced, developed, and concluded. Flow of ideas is not always clear. |
Organization of the key points are apparent. Ideas are mostly introduced, developed, and concluded. |
Organization of the key points are easy to grasp. Ideas are effectively introduced, developed, and concluded. Ideas are fully developed and supported with details.
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
|
Resource Integration |
Project fails to integrate the required resources. |
Some resources are referenced, but lack of integration negatively impacts critical thinking, synthesis, logic, and/or relevance. Some sections of content are generic or directly taken from a source/text Integrates Case management. |
Required resources are mostly integrated, in one’s own words, demonstrating some critical thinking, synthesis, logic, and relevance. Integrates Case management |
Required resources are fully integrated, in one’s own words, demonstrating deep critical thinking, synthesis, logic, and relevance. Integrates Case management |
|
|
|
0 |
4 |
8 |
10 |
|
|
APA Mechanics |
Project is not legible due to lack of APA mechanics (e.g. spelling, sentence, grammar, and punctuation). |
Spelling, sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are poor, according to APA. |
Structure needs significant work. Spelling, sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are inconsistent, according to APA. Significant editing would have been helpful. |
Structure is visible, but components may not be complete or concise. Spelling, sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are adequate, according to APA. Some additional editing would have been helpful. |
Structure is clear and concise. Spelling, sentence structure, grammar, and punctuation are excellent, according to APA. |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
|
APA Citations |
No sources are cited. |
Sources are not cited according to APA in-text and/or on the reference page. |
Some sources are cited according to APA in-text and/or on the reference page. |
Most sources are properly cited according to APA in-text and/or on the reference page. |
All sources are properly cited according to APA in-text and/or on the reference page. |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
