Win-Win Negotiation Paper 3 Page (MBA Level) - Single Space. Delivery Before 11AM 3 Dec (Time Zone In Atlantic, NS (GMT-4))

profileviki_Jog
Win-WinNegotiation--ppp.ppt

MBA6808

Business Negotiation

&

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Win-Win Negotiation

  • Cases where win-win negotiation is appropriate:

Long-term relationship

Goal compatibility

Intangible benefits

Concession

Constituency

Win-Win Negotiation

  • For most people, negotiation
  • A win-lose enterprise
  • Taught to think that way
  • Even if they think of it as win-win,
  • Money left on the table
  • Need to be hyper-vigilant
  • To create and maximize value

What is a win-win negotiation?

  • To many people, it means
  • Compromise
  • Even split
  • Feeling good
  • Building a relationship
  • Wasted resources; money left on the table.
  • However, win-win negotiation is
  • All creative opportunities are exploited
  • No resources are left on the table

Signs of Win-Win Potential

  • In most negotiation, win-win potential
  • How to discover?
  • Is there more than a single issue?
  • Can other issues be brought in?
  • Can side deals be made?
  • Do parties have different priorities?

A Pyramid Model of Win-Win Negotiation

  • Three levels of integrative agreements

Agreement is better than no agreement

Agreements that are good for both parties

Agreements that are impossible to improve upon

  • Pareto Optimality
  • Only 25% reach this level
  • Of this, 50% do so by chance

Pareto Optimality Condition

“The community becomes better off if one individual becomes better off and none worse off.”

A state of a given system is Pareto optimal, and thus efficient, if and only if there is no feasible alternative state of that system in which at least one person is better and no one is worse off.

A Pyramid Model
of Integrative Agreements

Level 3: Pareto-optimal

Level 2: Settlement demonstrably superior to other feasible settlements

Level 1: Mutual settlement (positive bargaining zone)

What Prevents People from Reaching this?

  • Two key problems

False Conflict

Believe in incompatible interest

Lose-lose effect: failure to capitalize on compatible interest

Fixed-pie Perception

Faulty assumptions

Perception that other party’s interests are completely opposed

What to do?

  • Be aware of the fixed-pie perception
  • Avoid making premature concessions
  • Have accurate understanding of the other party
  • Realize that most negotiations are mixed-motive

Strategies That Don’t Work

  • Commitment to reach a win-win agreement
  • Compromise
  • Adopting a cooperative Orientation
  • Focusing on a long-term relationship
  • Taking Extra time to negotiate

Strategies for Win-Win Negotiation

  • Perspective Taking
  • Different from empathy
  • See the world through counterparty’s eyes
  • Ask Diagnostic Questions
  • Underlying interests and priorities as well as justification
  • Lead to more interaction and receptivity
  • Have a high epistemic motivation
  • Discover where the value is (Frank McKenna case)

Frank McKenna of New Brunswick

“We had to know what was a “win” for the other party because if you don’t know what that is, you can’t meet it. When we negotiated to get call centers to come into our province, we had to know about their interests as far as location, turnover, and quality of the work force and how they prioritized each of these interests.”

The Globe and Mail, June 17, 2002

Strategies for Win-Win Negotiation

  • Provide Information
  • Paradox of negotiation
  • The question is not whether to reveal but what to reveal
  • Capitalize on reciprocity
  • Time Course for unraveling information
  • Avoid illusion of transparency

Strategies for Win-Win Negotiation

  • Unbundle the Issues
  • From single issue to multiple issue
  • Make Package Deals
  • Make several packages, don’t follow agenda
  • Make Multiple Offers Simultaneously
  • Multiple-issue package
  • Equal value offers
  • Dessert tray of offers

Advantages of Multiple Offers

  • Anchoring
  • Other party
  • Persistence
  • Signaling
  • Concession aversion

Strategies for Win-Win Negotiation

  • Structuring Contingency Contracts
  • Differences in value -- logrolling
  • Expectations -- a woman and her brother
  • Risk attitude -- risk-seeking vs. risk-taking
  • Time
  • Capabilities -- can collaborate
  • Pre-settlement Settlement
  • Formal, initial and partial
  • Search for Post-settlement Settlement

Decision-Making Model
of Integrative Negotiation

Resource Assessment

Construct Offers and Trade-Offs

Assessment of Differences

Postsettlement Settlements

not acceptable (optimistic)

not acceptable (bleak)

both agree

Current “Best” Terms

Impasse

Implement Agreement

Claiming Value

  • Old-fashioned negotiator
  • Taking hard, tough position
  • Flower child negotiator
  • Win-win negotiation
  • Enlightened negotiator
  • Pie-expansion as well as claiming value