Annotated Bibliography
The textile archaeology of Roman burials: Eyes Wide Shut
JOHN PETER WILD
� e excavation of a Roman cemetery presents the archaeologist with a series of particular challenges: the list seems to lengthen by the year, not least in response to today’s heightened sensitivities with regard to the treatment of the dead. Some problems, however, are of longer standing. In situations where textile remains might be, or might have been, present, Roman archaeologists seem too o� en to suff er from a form of myopia, not contracted from leading lights in other periods (Walton Rogers 2007; Stutz 2003, 295–304). It is symptomatic perhaps that in the archaeological literature the expression ‘unaccompanied burial’ regularly crops up – that is, a grave containing no readily recognisable grave goods, e.g. pottery, glass vessels or metalwork. But we know from our own experience that even in disaster situations – like the 200 earthquake in Haiti – the dead are rarely ‘unaccompanied’, it is a human reaction to cover them with textiles. � e archaeologically attested burial of naked bodies can be regarded as a deliberate ritual act, as in the case of the North European bog-bodies, like Lindow Man (Stead et al. 986; Turner, Scaife 995; Joy 2009). So, is the excavator of ‘unaccompanied burials’ missing something? Adjacent to the small Roman town of Ashton in Northamptonshire, a ‘managed’ inhumation cemetery of some 200 graves was excavated in 983 in advance of road building (Frere 984, 30 � g. 7; Frere 985, 288; Dix 984, 26–27; Upex 2008, 82, col.pl. 22). Most were at � rst sight empty, apart from the skeleton. � e grave in Fig. , for example, had a stone revetment, possibly once retained by planking. � ere were no grave goods, but the attitude of the skeleton, its arms crossed, suggests that it was originally con� ned in a textile wrapping. How should that be visualised? How can one record a negative? � erein lies a problem. Decaying organic materials have a better chance of being recognised and understood in an enclosed context, such as in the late fourth-century lead coffi n found in 998 within a stone sarcophagus at Spital� elds, London (� omas 999; Wild, forthcoming ). � anks to the persistence of a conservator, who had noted the glint of gold thread in the sludge on the bottom of the inner coffi n, the contents were saved at the eleventh hour and examined in detail in the laboratory: not just gold, but damask silk was eventually identi� ed. By contrast, as is well known, in the Roman-period cemeteries on the desert fringes of the Nile Valley, there is far better preservation of textile material. � ere, the problem is one of inadequate recording by the excavator rather than lack of imagination. Albert Gayet is pilloried for his eff orts at Antinoe a century ago (Calament 2005, 63–89, � gs6a, 8a, 8b; Nauerth 2006), and he certainly had a � are for publicity, but in terms of recording and publication he was not so much worse than his contemporaries.
Dressing the Dead in Classical Antiquity8
� ere is still room for improvement in the � eld of Eg yptolog y. � e fate of the Roman-period mummy no. 770 in Manchester Museum has not been a happy one. In 975 her wrappings were unceremoniously hacked off , without any archaeological three-dimensional recording, in pursuit of other lines of scienti� c enquiry. Making sense of the original textiles, including parts of a tunic, has been extremely diffi cult (David 979). It is easy to be critical. Let me now try to be more constructive, and turn to some of the textile situations which a rather less myopic archaeologist might be asked to bear in mind while digging. I will look � rst at the practice of cremation burial, which is of more concern in the western Roman provinces, where it has a long prehistory (Philpott 99, 8, 27–222), and then at inhumation burial, which is empire-wide and correspondingly multifarious in character. Burial practice was governed by locally valid cultural constraints. At each funerary event there were arguably three principal interested parties: the burial subject (the deceased), the burial agents (the family, with perhaps a master of religious ceremony) and the burial observers (the community). � eir common interest was to draw attention to the social standing of the deceased, and that could be achieved by the conspicuously high quality of the grave goods, among them textiles, deposited with the dead.
Fig. . Inhumation burial in the late Roman cemetery at Ashton, Oundle, Northamptonshire (photo by J. P .Wild).
9The textile archaeolog y of Roman burials : Eyes Wide Shut
In the funerary rite of cremation there were two opportunities for the introduction of textiles into the chain of events. Initially, the body of the deceased on the bier and on the pyre would be clad and wrapped in textiles. Later, a� er the heat of the pyre had died down, the larger cremated bone fragments would be gathered from the ashes for interment, either directly into a pottery or glass vessel or into a cloth or bag (Cool 2004, 444; Gleba 2008, 87–88), which might or might not be put into another container. A piece of linen tabby from one such bag, for example, preserved by the lead salts leaching from the unusual lead canister in which it was found, came from an early second-century grave near the legionary fortress at Caerleon in South Wales (Wheeler 929; Boon 959). In more elaborate chamber tombs, all manner of further textile items might be added alongside the familiar grave goods made of inorganic materials. � e cremation practices of the late Iron Age and early Roman periods in the western Roman provinces were particularly complex (Pearce 998; Niblett 2004; Philpott 99, 27–222; Heinzelmann et al. 200; Koster 200). Textiles play a prominent role. An aristocratic grave et al. 200; Koster 200). Textiles play a prominent role. An aristocratic grave et al of about AD 40–50 at Stanway near Colchester, arguably the burial of a druid, can serve as an example (Crummy et al. 2007, 20–253). � e rectangular mortuary pit held an array of et al. 2007, 20–253). � e rectangular mortuary pit held an array of et al grave goods including a gaming board (on which the cremated bone had been placed), a set of surgical instruments, a set of divining rods and feasting paraphernalia. A wool cloak in � ne diamond twill, with a suggestion of purple, seems to have been spread below the instruments, rods and gaming board, and folded back over them (Wild 2007, 347–348; Crummy et al. 2007, et al. 2007, et al � gs 02, 03). � at at least appears to be a plausible interpretation of the tiny scraps of fabric adhering to the metal objects, but one has to remember, as a possible alternative, the earlier Iron Age custom of wrapping each object separately in cloth before burial. Almost everything in the princely burial chamber at Hochdorf in Baden-Württemberg was wrapped in cloth (Banck-Burgess 999, 2–28), and there are signs of the practice in Britain too (Burns et al. 996, 09, � gs 75a, 75b). On the actual funeral pyre of course, the clothing and textiles on or over the deceased will go up in smoke (Cool 2004, 438–440). Indeed, in the later second century an anonymous wealthy Lingonian in Gaul made explicit provision for that in his will: ‘I want all my gear to be cremated with me … and the textiles in we� -faced compound tabby (polymitabe cremated with me … and the textiles in we� -faced compound tabby (polymitabe cremated with me … and the textiles in we� -faced compound tabby ( ) and tapestry (plumaria(plumaria( ) … that I have le� behind’ (Le Bohec 2003, 353–356; on dating, see Le Bohec 99, 44–46). If the tapestry incorporated gold thread, however, something might survive the � ames. � at was the case at Nijmegen in the Netherlands just a� er AD 00 when a prominent local lady was cremated with a textile that incorporated gold thread, perhaps a garment, or more likely a so� furnishing (Koster 200, 4–45 (grave 9); Wild 200). Tiny fragments of gold clearly aff ected by the heat were found among the cremated bone in a glass bottle (Koster 200, 44, pl. 37). � e thread had been Z-twisted from a gold ribbon only 0.8 mm wide. Scanning electron micrographs (Fig. 2) show traces of the original core thread (possibly silk) adhering to the inside of the spiral (Cooke, Lomas 200; Wild 200). Inhumation burial, practically universal across the Empire by the end of the third century, is relatively kind to organic materials, but presents the archaeologist with greater challenges. I shall do no more here than present a check-list of possible scenarios. Inevitably one turns to the Syrian deserts and the Nile Valley for the most satisfactory surviving evidence, though one has to be aware of their regional idiosyncrasies.
Dressing the Dead in Classical Antiquity20
Above: Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscope image of twisted gold ribbon from cremation grave 9 at Nijmegen West (photo by W. D. Cooke).
Far le� : Fig. 3. Mummy of young woman, probably from Antinoe, now in Musée du Louvre, Paris (inv. no. AF 6882), showing mitred wrapping with linen strips (drawing by Priscilla Wild).
Le� : Fig. 4. Clothed body of ‘Euphemia’ from Antinoe, now in Musées Royaux d’Art et d’Histoire, Brussels (inv. no. E.045) (drawing by Priscilla Wild).
2The textile archaeolog y of Roman burials : Eyes Wide Shut
At one end of the spectrum stands the wrapped mummy (Fig. 3): at the other the corpse dressed in Sunday-best clothes (Fig. 4) – Euphemia from Antinoe in this case (Calament 2005, 23, 547, 364–365), who has recently been deconstructed by Mark Van Strydonck and his colleagues (Van Strydonck et al. 20). Mitred wrapping of the mummi� ed body (eg Walker, Bierbrier 997, 38 n. , 07, no. 99) was a job for professionals (Fig. 3): the cost to the family for new and recycled linen was considerable (Montserrat 997, 37, 4; Wessely 922, no. 56). � e mummy might be covered with a painted linen shroud (Walker, Bierbrier 997, 20), itself bound into position (Walker, Bierbrier 997, 49). But the outward form might be built on a host of textile oddments inside. � e iconoclastic bishop Epiphanius on his travels in Syria took a dislike to a dyed and painted curtain (perhaps like the Artemis hanging in Riggisberg ) (Schrenk 2004, 82–88): ‘I tore it and recommended the custodians of the place to wrap the body of some poor man in it and bury him’ (Epiphanius, Epist. ad Johann. Episc. Hierosol. IX; Migne 864, 390). � e cross-binding Epist. ad Johann. Episc. Hierosol. IX; Migne 864, 390). � e cross-binding Epist. ad Johann. Episc. Hierosol is still visible on a piece of curtain in Cairo (De Moor, Fluck 2009, 04, � g. 6) and there are parallels elsewhere (De Moor, Fluck 2009, 9, � g. 2). Large pieces of sailcloth complete with their original reinforcing strips and even an attached brailing ring were used to pad out a late Ptolemaic mummy, now in Lyon (Wild 200, 25–27). Bodies wrapped in linen cloth, bound overall with tape (o� en red or red-striped) or secured with rope like a parcel, were o� en buried without any further protection and seem to be a feature of late antiquity (Huber 2006, 60 � g. 2; Calament 2005, 272). Schematised binding with rope is shown in a delightful sketch from the catacomb of Commodilla in Rome: the grave-digger with his miner’s pick and hanging lamp on a chain stands guard over a trussed corpse (Nicolai et al. 999, 60, pl. 64). Lazarus, too, is conventionally depicted in early Christian art as a neat parcel (Beckwith 958, pl. I). � e quality of the wrappings, even in secondary use, seems to have mattered. � e wealthier Palmyrenes opted for torn-up silk (Schmidt-Colinet et al. 2000, 5, 55–57). � e desiccated body et al. 2000, 5, 55–57). � e desiccated body et al of Bishop Paulinus, transported back to Trier in AD 386 (Boppert 990, 238), was wrapped in silk, and an outer layer of silk is claimed to have been wrapped around his cedarwood coffi n, converting the whole assemblage into a relic (Schaa� ausen 884, 238–242; Schneider 884, 77–78; Dreyspring, Schrenk 2007). At a number of urban centres across the Empire, bodies were sealed in plaster, usually within a coffi n. � e corpse was � rst wrapped in recycled linen of various sorts, without additional binding. An example is the burial of a mother and child at York, wrapped together in household towelling (Henshall 962, 08–09, pl. 33; see Carroll, this volume and pl. 2). Grave 99 at Poundbury near Dorchester shows similar negative impressions in the plaster – but the occupant of this sarcophagus had his feet covered with some fabric that contained gold thread (Crowfoot 993). In contrast to such mortuary packaging, it became increasingly common in later Roman times to inter the dead fully clothed (Fig. 4). Actually, to be more precise, the principal garments were mostly spread out over the body, followed sometimes by the entire contents of over the body, followed sometimes by the entire contents of over their clothes chest. How o� en the corpse was enclosed within a garment is a moot point that requires further investigation. Tomb D in a small cemetery with exceptionally well-preserved organic remains at Les Martres-de-Veyre in Central Gaul, dating to about AD 80, held a pinewood coffi n containing the remains of a girl dressed in a breast-band or girdle, a wide � tting Gallic coat of wool
Dressing the Dead in Classical Antiquity22
tabby and a pair of twill stockings (Audollent 923, 3–4, 27, 44–46; Romeuf 200, ; Van Driel-Murray 999). � ere was a basket of fruit, but no extra textiles. � e precise depositional facts, alas, were not recorded. A much more complex situation obtains for the rich coffi ned burials from a mortuary chapel attached to St Maximinus’ church in Trier (Reifarth 2005). � e deceased were members of the imperial court circle of late Roman Trier. � e burials are being studied by Nicole Reifarth using 3D scans, high-resolution digital mapping and a video microscope, to peer into the recesses of the encrusted remains – all non-invasive techniques (Reifarth et al. 2006; Reifarth 2007; Dreyspring 2002). In grave 279, for instance, the outline et al. 2006; Reifarth 2007; Dreyspring 2002). In grave 279, for instance, the outline et al of the body is visible, the collapsed skull and a scatter of pine shavings intended to soak up bodily � uids. On top of the body lay a violet-coloured undergarment and above that, a red silk damask tunic. A wool blanket had been spread over everything. � e cemeteries of Antinoe in Gayet’s brief accounts reveal great variety in burial practice, which he struggled to classify. In many cases, the deceased were interred in their own clothes, supplemented sometimes by the deposition of extra garments and/or additional shroud-like wrappings and bindings (Calament 2005, 276, 278). Gayet was fascinated by questions of identity, and the origin of a group of apparently ‘intrusive’ burials with atypical dress forms (Calament 2005, 280–293). Textile accessories for the comfort of the deceased are another possible feature to be aware of. Cushions are currently exhibited with Euphemia in Brussels (Fig. 4). Heads might rest on pillows or cushions (Schieck 2009), and the body might be laid on a pile mat or rush mat (Fujii et al. 989, 28; Ogawa, Naruse 976, 27, 98–99) or a blanket (Reifarth 2005, et al. 989, 28; Ogawa, Naruse 976, 27, 98–99) or a blanket (Reifarth 2005, et al Grab 249). To round off this brief tour of the horizon, I turn to a sarcophagus uncovered in a � eld at Castor near Peterborough, Cambridgeshire in 968. It was my � rst textile test as an excavator. � e sarcophagus had already lost part of its lid to the plough. � e content was at � rst sight uninspiring : it was ‘empty’, apart from a thick layer of mud at the bottom containing a few bone fragments. With some care we removed the mud, recording and retaining any items obvious to the naked eye (pl. ). With hindsight – and techniques have moved on vastly in the past forty years – that was a mistake. We were simply jettisoning vital evidence along with the mud. But we found in situ a pair of gold earrings, a silver � bula, sundry other grave goods and a copper-alloy bangle of twisted wire, still around what was le� of the lady’s right arm. Attached to it were metal-replaced remains of a linen textile (pl. 2), which I only noticed because I was half-expecting it. I thought at the time that it might represent clothing, but it could equally be the remains of cloth wrapping or binding – in fact there are now so many other possibilities to consider that I am almost glad that, so far, the grave remains unpublished!
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Melanie Giles for the reference to Stutz 2003 and to Christopher Sparey- Green for information about the Poundbury cemetery.
23The textile archaeolog y of Roman burials : Eyes Wide Shut
Bibliography
Audollent 923: A. Audollent, Les Tombes gallo-romaines à Inhumation des Martres-de-Veyre, Puy-de-Dôme, Mémoires présentés à l’Académie des Sciences et Belles-Lettres XIII, Paris
Banck-Burgess 999: J. Banck-Burgess, Hochdorf IV: Die Textilfunde aus dem späthallstattzeitlichen Fürstengrab von Eberdingen-Hochdorf (Kreis Ludwigsburg ) und weitere Grabtextilien aus hallstatt- und latènezeitlichen Kulturgruppen, Stuttgart
Beckwith 958: J. Beckwith, � e Andrews Diptych, London Boon 959: G. C. Boon, ‘Cloth from the Caerleon “pipe-burial”, 927’, Antiquaries Journal
XXXIX, 288–289 Boppert 990: W. Boppert, ‘Die Anfänge des Christentums’, in H. Cüppers (ed.), Die Römer
im Rheinland-Pfalz, Stuttgart, 233–257 Burns et al. 996: B. Burns, B. W. Cunliff e, H. Sebire, Guernsey: An Island Community of the
Atlantic Iron Age, Oxford University Committee for Archaeolog y Monograph 43, Oxford Calament 2005: F. Calament, La Révélation d’Antinoé par Albert Gayet. Histoire, Archéologie,
Muséographie, Institut français d’Archéologie Orientale, Bibliothèque d’Études coptes 8, –2, Cairo
Carroll 2006: M. Carroll, Spirits of the Dead. Roman Funerary Commemoration in Western Europe, Oxford
Cooke, Lomas 200: B. Cooke, B. Lomas, ‘Examination of the gold thread’, in A. Koster, Het Grafveld van Noviomagus en de rijke Graven van de stedelijke Elite, Nijmegen, 9, � gs 5–20
Cool 2004: H. E. M. Cool, � e Roman Cemetery at Brougham, Cumbria, Britannia Monograph 2, London
Crowfoot 993: E. Crowfoot, ‘Textiles and gold thread’, in D. E. Farwell, T. I. Molleson, Poundbury: Volume 2: � e Cemeteries, Dorchester, –3
Crummy et al. 2007: P. Crummy, S. Ben� eld, N. Crummy, V. Rigby, D. Shimmin, Stanway; An Elite Burial Site at Camulodunum, Britannia Monograph 24, London
David 979: A. R. David (ed.), Manchester Museum Mummy Project: Multidisciplinary Research on Ancient Eg yptian Mummi� ed Remains, Manchester
De Moor, Fluck 2009: A. De Moor, C. Fluck (eds), Clothing the House. Furnishing Textiles in the st Millennium AD � om Eg ypt and Neighbouring Countries: Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Research Group ‘Textiles � om the Nile Valley’, Antwerp, 6–7 October 2007, Tielt
De Moor, Fluck 20: A. De Moor, C. Fluck (eds), Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Research Group ‘Textiles � om the Nile Valley’, Antwerp, –3 October 2009, Tielt
Dix 984: B. Dix, ‘Ashton Roman town: archaeological rescue excavation’, Durobrivae: A Review of Nene Valley Archaeolog yReview of Nene Valley Archaeolog yReview of 9, 26–27
Dreyspring 2002: B. Dreyspring, ‘Textiltechnische Untersuchungen an einer frühchristlichen Sarkophagbestattung aus St Maximin in Trier’, in S. Martius, S. Russ (eds), Historische Textilien: Beiträge zur Erhaltung und Erforschung, Nürnberg, 9–24Beiträge zur Erhaltung und Erforschung, Nürnberg, 9–24Beiträge zur Erhaltung und Erforschung
Dreyspring, Schrenk 2007: B. Dreyspring, S. Schrenk, ‘Seidenfragment mit Spuren einer Stickerei aus dem Paulinusgrab’, in A. Demandt, J. Engemann (eds), Konstantin der Grosse, Mainz, 46–47, CD .4.34
Frere 984: S. S. Frere, ‘Roman Britain in 983’, Britannia XV, 266–322 Frere 985: S. S. Frere, ‘Roman Britain in 984’, Britannia XVI, 252–332
Dressing the Dead in Classical Antiquity24
Fujii et al. 989: H. Fujii, K. Sakamoto, M. Ichihashi, ‘Textiles from At-Tar caves Part : Cave 2, Hill C’, Al-Rā� dān X, 09–66
Gleba 2008: M. Gleba, Textile Production in Pre-Roman Italy, Ancient Textiles Series 4, Oxford
Heinzelmann et al. 200: M. Heinzelmann, J. Ortalli, P. Fasold, M. Witteyer, Römischer Bestattungsbrauch und Beigabensitten in Rom, Norditalien und den Nordwestprovinzen von der späten Republik bis in die Kaiserzeit, Wiesbadender späten Republik bis in die Kaiserzeit, Wiesbadender späten Republik bis in die Kaiserzeit
Henshall 962: A. S. Henshall, ‘Cloths in burials with g ypsum’, in Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in the City of York I: Eburacum, Roman York, London, 08–09
Huber 2006: B. Huber, ‘Al-Kom al-Ahmar/Sharūna: diff erent archaeological contexts – diff erent textiles?’, in Schrenk 2006, 57–68
Joy 2009: J. Joy, Lindow Man, London Koster 200: A. Koster, Het Grafveld van Noviomagus en de rijke Graven van de stedelijke Elite,
Nijmegen Le Bohec 99: Y. Le Bohec, Le Testament du Lingon, Collection du Centre d’Études Romaines
et Gallo-romaines NS 9, Lyon Le Bohec 2003: Y. Le Bohec, Inscriptions de la Cité des Lingons, Paris Migne 864: J.-P. Migne, Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Graeca XLIII, Paris Montserrat 997: D. Montserrat, ‘Deaths and funerals in the Roman Fayum’, in M. L. Bierbrier
(ed.), Portraits and Masks: Burial Customs in Roman Eg ypt, London, 33–44Portraits and Masks: Burial Customs in Roman Eg ypt, London, 33–44Portraits and Masks: Burial Customs in Roman Eg ypt Nauerth 2006: C. Nauerth, ‘Opportunities and limits of post-evaluation: Qarārah and al-
Hibe’, in S. Schrenk 2006, 43–55 Niblett 2004: R. Niblett, ‘� e native elite and their funerary practices’, in M. Todd (ed.), A
Companion to Roman Britain, Oxford, 30–4 Nicolai et al. 999: V. Fiocchi Nicolai, F. Bisconti, D. Mazzoleni, et al. 999: V. Fiocchi Nicolai, F. Bisconti, D. Mazzoleni, et al Les Catacombes chrètiennes de
Rome: Origine, Développement, Décor, Inscriptions, Turnhout Ogawa, Naruse 976: Y. Ogawa, N. Naruse, ‘Textiles and allied materials’, in H. Fujii (ed.),
At-Tar I: Excavations in Iraq, 97–974, Tokyo, 20–20 Pearce 998: J. Pearce, ‘From death to deposition: the sequence of ritual in cremation burials of
the Roman period’, in C. Forcey, J. Hawthorne, R. Witcher (eds), TRAC 97. Proceedings of the 7th Annual � eoretical Roman Archaeolog y Conference, Oxford, 99–
Philpott 99: R. Philpott, Burial Practices in Roman Britain: A Survey of Grave Treatment and Furnishing AD 43 – 40, British Archaeological Report 29, Oxford
Reifarth 2005: N. Reifarth, Die spätantiken Sarkophagbestattungen aus St Maximin in Trier: Denkmalp� egerische Problematik – exemplarische Konzepte zur wissenscha� lichen Auswertung – Überlegungen zum kün� igen Umgang, MA dissertation, BambergAuswertung – Überlegungen zum kün� igen Umgang, MA dissertation, BambergAuswertung – Überlegungen zum kün� igen Umgang
Reifarth 2007: N. Reifarth, ‘Late antique sarcophagus burials from St Maximin in Trier: current examination’, Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 45, 5–20Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 45, 5–20Archaeological Textiles Newsletter
Reifarth et al. 2006: N. Reifarth, W.-R. Teegen, N. Boenke, J. Wiethold, ‘Das spätantike Grab et al. 2006: N. Reifarth, W.-R. Teegen, N. Boenke, J. Wiethold, ‘Das spätantike Grab et al 279 aus St Maximin in Trier’, Funde und Ausgrabungen im Bezirk Trier 38, 58–70Funde und Ausgrabungen im Bezirk Trier 38, 58–70Funde und Ausgrabungen im Bezirk Trier
Romeuf 200: A.-M. Romeuf, Les Martes-de-Veyre (Puy-de-Dôme): le Quartier Artisanal gallo- romain, Deuxième Cahier du Centre Archéologique de Lezoux, Lezoux
Schaa� ausen 884: H. Schaa� ausen, ‘Der Sarg des heil. Paulinus in Trier’, Jahrbuch des Vereins von Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland 77, 238–242Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland 77, 238–242Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland
25The textile archaeolog y of Roman burials : Eyes Wide Shut
Schieck 2009: A. Schieck, ‘Late Roman cushions and the principles of their decoration’, in De Moor, Fluck 20, 5–32
Schmidt-Colinet et al. 2000: A. Schmidt-Colinet, A. Stauff er, K. al-Ascad, Die Textilien aus Palmyra: Neue und Alte Funde, Mainz
Schneider 884: F. Schneider, ‘Die Krypta von St Paulin zu Trier’, Jahrbuch des Vereins von Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland 78, 67–98Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland 78, 67–98Alterthums� eunden im Rheinland
Schrenk 2004: S. Schrenk, Textilien des Mittelmeerraumes aus spätantiker bis � ühislamischer Zeit, RiggisbergZeit, RiggisbergZeit
Schrenk 2006: S. Schrenk (ed.), Textiles in situ: � eir Find Spots in Eg ypt and Neighbouring Countries in the First Millennium CE, Riggisberger Bericht 3, Riggisberg
Stead et al. 986: I. M. Stead, J. B. Bourke, D. R. Brothwell (eds), et al. 986: I. M. Stead, J. B. Bourke, D. R. Brothwell (eds), et al Lindow Man: � e Body in the Bog, Londonthe Bog, Londonthe Bog
Stutz 2003: L. Nillson Stutz, Embodied Rituals and Ritualized Bodies: Tracing Ritual Practices in Late Mesolithic Burials, Lund
� omas 999: C. � omas, ‘Laid to rest on a pillow of bay leaves’, British Archaeolog y 50, 8– Turner, Scaife 995: R. C. Turner, R. G. Scaife (eds), Bog Bodies: New Discoveries and New
Perspectives, London Upex 2008; S. G. Upex, � e Romans in the East of England: Settlement and Landscape in the
Lower Nene Valley, Stroud Van Driel-Murray 999: C. Van Driel-Murray, ‘A set of Roman clothing from Les Martres-de-
Veyre, France’, Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 28, –5Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 28, –5Archaeological Textiles Newsletter Van Strydonck et al. 20: M. Van Strydonck, M. Bondin, I. Vanden Berghe, K. Cuintelier, et al. 20: M. Van Strydonck, M. Bondin, I. Vanden Berghe, K. Cuintelier, et al
‘� e so-called embroideress Euphemia’, in A. De Moor, C. Fluck 20, forthcoming Walker, Bierbrier 997; S. Walker, M. Bierbrier, Ancient Faces: Mummy Portraits � om Roman
Eg ypt, LondonEg ypt, LondonEg ypt Walton Rogers 2007; P. Walton Rogers, Cloth and Clothing in Early Anglo-Saxon England AD
450–700, Council for British Archaeolog y Research Report 45, York Wessely 922: C. Wessely (ed.), Studien zur Paläographie und Papyrusurkunde XXII, LeipzigStudien zur Paläographie und Papyrusurkunde XXII, LeipzigStudien zur Paläographie und Papyrusurkunde Wheeler 929: R. E. M. Wheeler, ‘A Roman pipe burial from Caerleon, Monmouthshire’,
Antiquaries Journal IX, –7Antiquaries Journal IX, –7Antiquaries Journal Wild, Wild 200: F. C. Wild, J. P. Wild, ‘Sails from the Roman port at Berenike, Eg ypt’, � e
International Journal of Nautical Archaeolog y 30 (2), 2–220 Wild 2007: J. P. Wild, ‘Textiles’, in Crummy et al. 2007, 347–350 Wild 200: J. P. Wild, ‘� e gold thread’, in Koster 200, 92–94 Wild, forthcoming : J. P. Wild, ‘� e textiles’, in C. � omas, Report on Excavation of a Cemetery
at Spital� elds, London, forthcoming