Essay
Wider Tariffs Threaten to Take a Big Economic Toll Publication info: Dow Jones Institutional News ; New York [New York]03 June 2018.
ProQuest document link
FULL TEXT
When President Donald Trump threatened in early March to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, many
analysts said the economic impact would be limited, provided the U.S. and other countries didn't slide into a tit-for-
tat trade war.
With tensions escalating, trade could become a growing risk for the broader U.S. economy.
The U.S. has imposed steel and aluminum tariffs on the European Union, Canada and Mexico, and they have
pledged to return fire on a range of U.S. goods from motorcycles and bourbon to berries, grapes and blue jeans.
The Trump administration has also taken steps toward imposing tariffs on industrial supplies and other goods
imported from China and is considering an additional wave of tariffs on auto imports.
The U.S. imports $2.36 trillion worth of goods a year. It imports about $29 billion worth of steel and roughly $13
billion worth of aluminum annually. That accounts for less than 2% of total imports and just 0.2% of total economic
output. But with the range of goods prone to tariffs widening, the impact could spread. The Trump administration
has threatened $150 billion worth of tariffs on Chinese imports -- taking steps to proceed on the first $50 billion --
and auto imports total $176 billion. Altogether that is nearly 15% of total U.S. imports.
"Uncertainty over trade clouds the horizon," Federal Reserve Governor Lael Brainard said last week, adding that "an
escalation in measures and countermeasures -- although an outside risk -- could prove disruptive at home and
abroad."
Tariffs have wide-ranging economic effects. They raise the prices of imported goods, nudging up inflation
measures and potentially interest rates. That is a negative. They can also boost some domestic industries, such as
steel or aluminum production, by reducing foreign competition. That is a positive. But by boosting the prices of
imported goods, they also increase input costs for domestic producers, such as car or soda can makers that need
steel and aluminum. That is another negative. Higher costs, in turn, can lead to less production and less hiring.
Adding up all the negatives and positives is tricky.
Economists at Barclays estimated in March that steel and aluminum tariffs, by reducing trade volumes and
boosting inflation, could reduce U.S. growth by 0.1 to 0.2 percentage point. Oxford Economics, a research firm,
estimates that steel and aluminum tariffs by themselves will lead to net job losses of 70,000 in the manufacturing
sector -- with 10,000 new jobs in the metal-producing sector offset by 80,000 jobs lost in metal-consuming sectors.
That is pretty modest. The U.S. economy generated 223,000 jobs in May alone, and growth appears to be picking
up after slowing in the first quarter.
According to a survey of economists conducted by The Wall Street Journal in March, steel and aluminum levies
would reduce U.S. employment by 53,000 on average, as gains in the domestic steel and aluminum industries
would be outweighed by losses in sectors that purchase those metals. If other countries were to retaliate with
limited tariffs of their own, the economists predicted roughly 137,000 jobs lost on net in the U.S.
But the cost in jobs widens as tariffs spread. If tit-for-tat retaliation escalated, raising global tariff and nontariff
By Harriet Torry
barriers to levels last seen in the early 1990s, before the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and
the World Trade Organization, the economists on average saw 845,000 net U.S. jobs lost, with estimates ranging
from 10,000 to 3,000,000. David Shulman, senior economist at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, in the
survey said it could lead to recession.
Some impacts of tariffs are already showing up in the economy. Prices of futures contracts for U.S. hot-rolled coil
steel have risen 10% since early March, while aluminum prices have increased 6.2%.
Economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. expect that adding Canada, Mexico and the EU to countries facing tariffs
of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum could boost prices across the broad economy by one one-hundredth of a
percentage point.
That is unlikely to significantly alter the Federal Reserve's policy of gradually raising short-term interest rates to
prevent the economy from overheating. Broad measures of inflation are now near the Fed's 2% target. Still, the
central bank is alert to the potential wider impact of trade disruptions on economic growth.
The Fed's recent "Beige Book" report, a collection of anecdotes across the economy, was flush with references to
uncertainty relayed to the Fed by business contacts around the country.
"The major concern manufacturers expressed was trade policy," the Fed reported out of Boston. "Some worried
about the effects of tariffs on their costs, while a maker of testing equipment said they might move some
production to Europe to avoid Chinese retaliation against the United States."
Worsening trade tension might also affect household and business confidence.
"People view the trade tariffs in an unfavorable way, they think the tariffs will hurt themselves and the economy as
a whole," Richard Curtin, director of the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, told the Journal. The index
of consumer sentiment has drifted lower since March, although it remains high compared with historical levels.
The survey, which polls about 600 people each month, found fewer than 1% of respondents in April and just 2% in
May had positive views of tariffs, according to Mr. Curtin, who said views of tariffs were "overwhelmingly negative
across all political parties."
Write to Harriet Torry at [email protected]
(END)
June 03, 2018 13:39 ET (17:39 GMT) DETAILS
Subject: Economists; Interest rates; Tariffs; Aluminum; Costs
Location: Mexico United States--US Canada China Europe
People: Trump, Donald J
Company / organization: Name: Goldman Sachs Group Inc; NAICS: 523110, 523120; Name: World Trade
Organization; NAICS: 928120; Name: European Union; NAICS: 926110, 928120;
Name: Wall Street Journal; NAICS: 511110; Name: University of Michigan; NAICS:
611310
Publication title: Dow Jones Institutional News; New York
Publication year: 2018
Publication date: Jun 3, 2018
LINKS Link to Full Text
Database copyright 2018 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest
Publisher: Dow Jones &Company Inc
Place of publication: New York
Country of publication: United States, New York
Publication subject: Business And Economics
Source type: Wire Feeds
Language of publication: English
Document type: News
ProQuest document ID: 2049436152
Document URL: https://login.dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/20494
36152?accountid=14761
Copyright: Copyright Dow Jones &Company Inc Jun 3, 2018
Last updated: 2018-06-04
Database: Global Newsstream
- Wider Tariffs Threaten to Take a Big Economic Toll