help me find some infromations about restricting adolescents’ internet access (i.e. blocking certain websites on their computer)

whitepaper.docx

Home >English homework help >Article writing homework help >help me find some infromations about restricting adolescents’ internet access (i.e. blocking certain websites on their computer)

In reviewing this White Paper, keep in mind the various principles of writing professional documents that we have discussed this semester (ethos, audience, design, etc.). You should give thorough and specific comments to address these issues, in addition to more content, technical, or mechanical issues. In other words, your responses should be more than simply, “Yes” or “No.” To aid in the peer review process, use the following form to direct your constructive, critical effort (your work here is extremely important). This form draws on the PowerPoint presentations on the White Paper available on the course site. Collaborative work is a vital part of much that goes on in the professional world; keep this in mind as you thoughtfully respond to the writing of your classmates.

PART ONE: The Executive Summary

1. Does the executive summary clearly establish the problem that will be addressed in the white paper—very specifically, leaving no questions?

2. Do you understand the scope and relevance of the problem for citizens in contemporary society?

3. Does the executive summary explain the three solutions that the white paper will address to help “solve” this problem?

4. If there is no separate section for history/contextualization, does the executive summary discuss past and current approaches to solving the problem?

5. Does the executive summary provide the readers with enough information for them to make decisions about 1) if the paper is relevant to them (as an audience member), 2) if the solutions are ones that they would like to learn more about, and 3) that the paper is written with a critical eye by a credible author(s)?

PART TWO: The Introduction

1. Does the introduction clearly define the problem (subject) of the white paper?

2. Is the purpose of the white paper clearly stated (why this paper is being written [more than likely to introduce potential solutions to the identified problem]?

3. Are the main solutions the paper will offer up alluded to in the introduction (a forecast of content)?

4. Is the importance of the subject (the problem and solutions) stressed in the introduction—why you should read the white paper?

5. Are the problem and solutions contextualized by providing necessary background information (what your readers need to know in order to understand your approach to this paper)?

6. Is the introduction to the white paper successful in 1) grabbing the readers’ attention, 2) letting the readers know what they will be reading, and 3) giving the readers an idea of how this paper came into being (historically)?

PART THREE: Body Text

1. Does the white paper provide enough historical background to give you a solid understanding of the issue (what has lead to the current problem and solutions—historical, societal factors, other approaches to the problem, etc.)?

2. Are each of the solutions/approaches to obviating the problem contextualized/discussed prior to each solution? Will readers know who will be affected by this section, what the particulars of the problem are, and what the specific reasons are for the forthcoming section?

3. Are previous approaches to solving the problem addressed?

4. Is each solution thorough, specific, and well-defined?

5. Does the white paper successfully use credible sources to lend Ethos to their arguments (solutions)?

6. Does the organization of the body text have its own logic (is it easy to follow the train of thought from section to section)?

7. What patterns of arrangement are used for 1) the whole paper, and 2) each solution section? Is it successful?

8. Are the solutions proposed persuasive? That is, does it seem like each solution is 1) viable, 2) implementable, 3) one that would make a difference, and 4) well-established/advocated for?

9. Are each of the three solutions and/or audiences given equal treatment—dealt with in an even-handed manner?

PART FOUR: The Conclusion

1. Does the paper make an obvious move to conclude the white paper (i.e. is there the use of a transitional device)?

2. Does this section restate the main points of the white paper?

3. Does the conclusion restate the importance of the subject/problem? Is it clear why readers are supposed to read the paper—why this information is important and why it is applicable to them?

4. Does the conclusion look towards the future—does it discuss how each of the solutions might function in actual society/how they could work in concert?

PART FIVE: Design Elements

1. Title Page

1. Does the title page appropriately grab your attention and inform you of the subject and nature of the white paper?

2. What ethos and tone does the cover page create? Is it appropriate/consistent with the rest of the paper?

3. Does the title page set a visual standard that is followed throughout the white paper (repetition, consistency, etc.)?

2. Headers

1. Do the headers talk—that is to say, do they meet the “stand alone test”?

2. Are the headers appropriately descriptive?

3. Do the headers work together? Is there grammatical and tonal consistency among the headers and sub-headers?

4. Are the headings visually prominent?

5. Do the headers help the document with its scannability?

3. Summary Text Boxes/Pullouts

1. Do the text boxes meet the stand alone test?

2. Do they accurately convey the substance of the adjacent section (are they redundant)?

3. Do they present the most important information to the summary-only readers (think of a reader only reading the text boxes)?

4. Do the text boxes work together to present an overall picture of the white paper? Are design principles of repetition, contrast, alignment, and proximity adhered to with the headings?

4. Visuals (function as an aid to the text)

1. Do charts, graphs, and tables convey information succinctly and accurately?

2. Do images used set an appropriate tone (professional ethos), present relevant examples or explanations?

3. Do visuals fit in with the overall design/layout of the white paper?

4. Are they consistently, accurately, and prominently labeled?

5. Do captions direct the reader to important information (know where to look on the visual)?

6. Do captions help readers interpret the image, chart, graph, or table (know how the authors want the images interpreted)?

5. Content/Repitition/Alignment/Proximity

1. Examine the document for contrast:

i. Is contrast used appropriately to organize information (how so or how not)?

ii. Is contrast used appropriately to highlight information (how so or how not)?

2. Examine the document for repetition:

i. Are key design elements repeated (for instance, features from the title page)?

ii. Are fonts used in a consistent manner?

iii. Are colors used in a consistent manner?

3. Examine the document for alignment:

i. Is there strong alignment?

ii. Is there consistent alignment?

i. If alignment broken? If so, is it for a clear purpose?

4. Examine the document for proximity:

i. Is proximity used to express a relationship between elements of the white paper (i.e. proximity of headers, text boxes, images, body sections, etc.)?

ii. I the lack of proximity used to distinguish between elements of the white paper?

PART SIX: Sources

1. Is all information that comes from an external source (quote, paraphrase, summary, statistic, graph, chart, etc.) cited?

2. Is one citation format used and used consistently and correctly (MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.)?

3. Is a bibliography included and labeled in an instrumental way?

4. Is there sufficient support (enough credible sources)?

PART SEVEN: Writing, Grammar, Mechanics

1. Overall, does the writing of the document add to its overall success?

2. Overall, does the writing of the document detract from its overall success (it is difficult to understand due to the writing)?

3. Does it appear as though the document is one, cohesive unit—that the writing of all sections is the same?

4. Are there any grammatical issues that need attending to? What are they? (also mark on the actual draft)?

5. Are there sections of the document that would benefit from substantial writing revision?

6. Is the white paper written in consistent third-person?

Project Summary

In this project, groups of 2-4 members will be asked to do web-based and library research and then to write an informative white paper on methods for addressing an ethical issue created by an innovative technology. For instance, you might examine the electronic commerce, digital communiction and workflow, and content management systems in business and educational contexts, p2p file sharing and copyright law, safety issues, identity theft, etc. Alternately, you may choose to research another topic that does not revolve around technology, but it must be a current and relevant issue that is thoroughly researchable. will research and present technological solutions to specific, meaningful problems (e.g., problems of internet security, alternative energy, prescription medication options, etc).

This research will result in a visually sophisticated document of 10 to 15 pages that presents findings to an appropriate rhetorical situation. You must present at least three solutions to the problem which take into account the needs of the different readers. This will not be a compare and contrast paper where you campaign for one of the solutions. Rather, you will advocate EQUALLY for all three solutions. White papers are designed as background documents that present the issue and potential solutions, then allow the reader to draw their own conclusions.

Length and Format: The length of your white paper will depend somewhat on your choice of topics, but should be within 10 to 15 pages (formatting will vary based on the design employed by each group, but every white paper should be visually sophisticated.) All sources should be appropriately cited in MLA format .

Info About White Papers:

Many of the white papers you will find online are overtly persuasive or biased towards one side of an issue. The white papers we will be writing in this class are "backgrounder" documents that provide the reader with all the information to make an informed decision WITHOUT persuading them of the proper solution.

Again, this is NOT a persuasive paper; it is an objective background paper that informs the reader about a problem, explains the history of that problem, and offers 3 balanced solutions for the reader's perusal WITHOUT suggesting one solution over another. The reader is left to draw their own conclusions about which solution is preferable to them (although the paper does include a conclusion!)

Learn to Write a White Paper How to Design a White Paper How to Write a White Paper by Michael Knowles How to Write a White Paper – A White Paper on White Papers

OTHER ARTICLES (that support the persuasive nature of the white paper):

The Steak Behind the Sizzle: Effective Marketing Using White Papers Creating White Papers that Drive Sales

Deliverables

There will be both group and individual deliverables for this project. Groups will be responsible for the following:

Group Deliverable 1: Proposal. You will have the opportunity to review individual proposals on the discussion forum and to discuss possibilities and form groups. Each group will turn in one hardcopy of a 250 word topic proposal, in the form of a memo. This memo will include information about the topic under consideration, the potential solutions to be examined, and possible resources. Follow the guidelines for memo writing outlined at Purdue's Owl. Remember that you are selling an idea -- this is a persuasive, not descriptive, document. This means presenting the problem or issue as worthy of consideration, and the (three) solutions as relevant, while demonstrating the feasibility of the project within the parameters of the assignment.

Group Deliverable 2 and 3: Draft and Final Copy of White Paper. Each group will be required to have a draft posted for peer review. Remember that a draft is a complete version.

Individuals within groups will be responsible for the following deliverables:

Individual Deliverable 1: Topic Forum Post. Each individual will post a project topic on the White Paper Forum (professionally written with a subject heading Topic Proposal: ____ ). Every student will then respond to other posts to ensure that they have negotiated a topic and a group.

Individual Deliverable 2: Work Blog. Each individual will be required to keep a blog which a) records their research and b) details their contributions to the project. Workblogs will be updated weekly until the project concludes.

Individual Deliverable 3: Project Assessment. An important component of your project is successful collaboration. Each member will reflect on their participation in the project and on the experience of working in a group. The collaborative evaluation form is attached below as a Word document - type your answers in this document and email it to me at the conclusion of the project.

Grading

The White Paper Project breakdowns as follows:

Group D 1: Proposal: 10%

Group D 2: White Paper Draft: 5%

Group D 3: White Paper Final: 65%

Individual D 1: Discussion Board / Topic Negotiation: 5%

Individual D 2: Research & Workblog: 10%

Individual D 3: Collaboration Assessment: 5%

Grading Criteria

Grading criteria are outlined on the " White Paper Rubric " which will be used for project evaluation. When I assign a grade to your project, I will pay particular attention to see whether your white paper is informative and accurate and that you avoid as much as possible arguing a particular position. You should strive for a balance of perspectives and accurate coverage of a focused topic. The point is not to advocate for a position or "pamphleteer," but to establish a foundation of knowledge about the subject that future students and researchers will find useful. I will also weigh your feedback on the Collaborative Project Evaluation form attached at the bottom of the page.

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES:

Your white paper should meet the following criteria:

· Between 10-15 pages in length

· Include at least one graphic (with corresponding citation)

· Appropriate page numbers and headings

· In-text citations for each item of supporting evidence

Contain the following elements:

1. Title page

2. Table of contents

3. Table of figures (if the document contains four or more figures)

4. Executive summary which a) is written for a general audience, b)presents the paper's highlights (no new information), c)identifies the issue or need leading to the report, d)offers key facts, statistics, and findings, and e)includes a condensed conclusion

5. Introduction (orients audience to the PAPER, not the PROBLEM)--no more than 1 page

6. Background (history of problem and steps taken to address it)--prove that the problem exists

7. Discussion of three solutions (2-3 pages EACH)

8. Conclusion

9. Works Cited