Bussiness Ethics Assignment
MANAGEMENT \ Updated April 5, 2013, 10'.20 p.m. ET
When Your Boss Makes You Pay for Being Fat ...,\1_ .....A_rti~.C_'e••••__ ..Ji__..-=-V~id"',-e_o:=~~'WW~IJ..! .....s_toc.....k ••Q"'u:"".!...-"'es""·-=-"'i.:.l~=c.,~:m:m:e_n~:"'(...42••7":J,,•• :••••••••• -_m-_
Email Print
By LESLIE KWOH
Bloomberg News
Michelin North America workers with high blood pressure or large waisllines may have to pay higher health-care premiums starting next year.
Are you a man with a waist measuring 40 inches or more? If you want to work
at Michelin North America Inc., that spare tire could cost you,
Employees at the tire maker who have high blood pressure or certain size
waistlines may have to pay as much as $1,000 more for health-care coverage
starting next year.
As they fight rising health-care costs and poor results from voluntary wellness
programs, companies across America are penalizing workers for a range of
conditions, including high blood pressure and thick waistlines. They are also
demanding that employees share personal-health information, such as body- mass index, weight and blood-sugar level, or face higher premiums or deductibles.
Corporate leaders say they can't
lower health-care costs without
changing workers' habits, and they
cite the findings of behavioral
economists showing that people
respond more effectively to potential
losses, such as penalties, than
expected gains, such as rewards.
With corporate spending on health care expected to reach an average of
$12,136 per employee this year,
according to a study by the consulting firm Towers Watson, fTW +o26o/~1
penalties may soon be the new norm.
With companies facing ever higher heatth care costs, employers are now using real money, and sometimes penalties, to make sure their employees are taking responsibility of their own health. MarketWatch's Jim Jeller reports. (Photo: Getty Images)
Employers may argue that tough-love
measures, such as punishing
workers who evade health
screenings, benefit their staff and
lower health-care costs. But such steps also portend a murky future in which a
chronic condition, such as hypertension, could cost workers jobs or
promotions-or prevent them from being hired in the first place. ~-----
More When a Job Can Go Up in Smoke At Work: Are Health Penalties Fair?
Until recently, Michelin awarded workers automatic $600 credits toward deductibles, along with extra money for completing health-assessment surveys
or participating in a nonbinding "action plan" for wellness. It adopted its stricter
policy after its health costs spiked in 2012.
Now, the company will reward only those workers who meet healthy standards
for blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and waist size-under 35
inches for women and 40 inches for men. Employees who hit baseline requirements in three or more categories will receive up to $1,000 to reduce their annual deductibles. Those who don't qualify must sign up for a heallh-
coaching program in order to earn a smaller credit.
Vote Employee-rights advocates say the
penalties are akin to "legal
discrimination." While companies are
calling them wellness incentives, the
penalties are essentially salary cuts
by a different name, says Lew
Maltby, president of Princeton, N.J.-
based National Workrights Institute, a
nonprofrt advocacy group for employee rights in the workplace. "No one ever
calls a bad thing what it really is," he says. "It means millions of people are
getting their pay cut for no legitimate reason."
View Results»
Should employees wlw don't meet health and lifestyle standm'ds llUue to pay more/or 1lealth insurance?
Yes
No
Companies may say they have tried softer approaches, but many haven't
exhausted their options, like putting healthier food in their cafeterias, building a
fitness center or subsidizing gym memberships, he adds. "At best, these
programs are giving employers an enormous amount of control over our
private lives."
Michelin denies any discrimination and says the policy is voluntary. Not
participating means employees won't get the incentives. Wayne Culbertson,
Michelin's chief human resources officer, says the old incentive programs
didn't lead to meaningful change. For example, an employee could pledge to
start walking daily, he says, but never have to prove it. "It was sort offree, you
know? You got $600 just for being a good employee."
Six in 10 employers say they plan to impose penalties in the next few years on employees who don't take action to improve their health, according to a recent study of 800 mid- to large-size firms by human-resources consultancy Aon
Audio ! AON -4 13% Hewitt A separate study Leslie Kwoh talks more about companies by the National Business Group on getting tougher on employee health with The Health and Towers Watson found Wall Street Joumal This Moming. that the share of employers who plan
00:001 to impose penalties is likely to double 00:00
to 36% in 2014.
Current law permits companies to
use health-related rewards or penalties as long as the amount doesn't exceed
20% of the cost of the employee's health coverage. John Hancock, a veteran labor and employment attorney at Butzel Long, a Detroit-based law firm, says
that while companies can't legally dock a worker's pay for a health issue, they can tie an employee's health-care bill to whether the worker meets or misses
health goals. As long as employers offer exemptions for workers with
conditions that prevent them from meeting health goals, the firms are in the clear.
The situation is less clear if, for example, a company ends up singling out
obese employees by charging them more for health coverage. If the obesity is
linked to an underlying condition, the employer may be liable for discrimination, Mr. Hancock says.
Currently, most companies tie between 5% and 10% of employee premium
costs to incentives, but that will likely go up, says Charlie Smith, chief medical
officer for national accounts at insurer Cigna Corp. I CI -2.65% r
Phannacy chain CVS Caremark I CVS -2.06% (sparked outrage among employees and workers-rights advocates last month by asking staff members
to report personal health metrics, including their body fat, blood sugar, blood
pressure and cholesterol levels, to the company's insurer by Mayor pay a
$600 penalty.
Health Costs How your shape can weigh on your wallet.
$652 Additional amount that General Electric employees who self-identify as smokers must pay for health care each year.
$1,000
Penalty that Honeywell is adding for workers who get certain types of surgery without seeking more input.
$600
Annual penalty CVS employees must pay if they fail to report their weight, body fat and cholesterol levels to the company's benefits firm.
$100
Monthly penalty that Mohawk Industries charges employees who don't participate in a health-risk assessment. I
$1,000
Maximum additional amount Michelin employees with high blood pressure or large waistlines could pay for health dare.
Few workers can afford to refuse, but
some aren't happy. "It opens a Pandora's box," says a full-time CVS
employee who works at a distribution
center in Florida. "It's none of their
business." While the 26-year-old
describes himself as healthy, he says
he is worried about disclosing health
infonnation that could be shared
without his knowledge. He says he
plans to cancel his health plan, which
also covers his wife and child, and
will start looking for work elsewhere.
CVS, which maintains that the
change is intended to make workers
aware of their health risks, says it doesn't have access to workers'
screening results.
Mohawk Industries, ! MHK -1.92% la Calhoun, Ga.-based flooring
company, says participation in its company's health-risk assessment process
shot up to 97% after the cbmpany imposed a $100 monthly penalty on
nonparticipants. The company had previously offered rewards for participating
in the assessment, but enrOllment rates were low, says Phil Brown, senior vice president of human r",_"nllr".,'"'' HQneywelllntemstiGnal I~G. ! Clml 1.2~%lrecently intrQQllceQ a $1,000 penalty-<leducted from health-savings accounts-for workers who elect to get
certain procedures such ~s knee and hip replacement and back surgery without seeking more inp~t. The company had offered $500 for participating in
a program that provides ,ccess to data and additional opinions for workers
considering surgery, but less than 20% of the staff joined up. Since it flipped the incentive to a penalty, the company says, enrollment has been above 90%.
There are no new data 01 surgeries, but the change is projected to save at least $3 million annually, says Brian Marcotte, Honeywell'S vice president of
. I compensation and benefits, who presented the plan at the Conference Board's
Employee Health Care Conference last month. .
Typically, 20% of a complny's workforce drives 80% of health-care costs, I
according to Cigna's Mr. Smith, and roughly 70% of health-care costs are
related to chronic conditions brought on by lifestyle choices, such as
overeating or sedentary behavior. But when employers target those conditions,
employees themselves may feel targeted, especially when it comes to their
weight. While companies can't say it outright, many of their measures-such
as high cholesterol and high blood pressure-are proxies for obesity.
I A 2011 Gallup survey estimated obese or overweight full-time U.S. workers
I miss an additional 450 million days of work each year, compared with healthy workers, resulting in morJ than $153 billion in lost productivity.
Worse. chronic conditions could someday harm workers' chances of getting
hired, says Deborah Peel, a psychiatrist and founder of the Austin, Texas- based nonprofit Patient Privacy Rights. Patient information sometimes gets
leaked, sold or stolen, she warns, noting that she has fielded complaints from
job seekers claiming that employers requested health records before extending
an offer. "It's incredibly unfair," she says. "It should be about our track record"
dOing our jobs.
For now, employers are trying to balance the carrot and the stick. Plenty of
companies will be watching to see if inflicting a little financial pain leads to change in the long run. 'What are the right pain points?" asks Paul Keckley,
executive director of Deloitte LLP's health-care research arm, the Center for
Health Solutions. "Ultimately, you have to make behavior change automatic.
We've got to make this like brushing your teeth."
-Lauren Weber contributed to this article.
Write to Leslie Kwoh at [email protected]
Ii version of this article appeared April 6. 2013. on page Al in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal ..with the headline: Shape Up or Pay Up: Firms Put in New Health Penalties.