Sex education

profileshandrikaf
WhatDoParentinMississippiReallyThinkAboutSexEducationInSchool1.pdf

97 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice Volume 7, Issue 1, Special Issue, Spring 2014, pp. 97 - 119 © 2011 Center for Health Disparities Research School of Community Health Sciences University of Nevada, Las Vegas

What Do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? Results of a State-Level Survey

Colleen McKee, Mississippi State University Kathleen Ragsdale, Mississippi State University Linda H. Southward, Mississippi State University

ABSTRACT Purpose: Despite broad public support for comprehensive sex education, its implementation remains controversial in the United States, especially in states such as Mississippi that have been identified as politically conservative. This study examined parental opinions regarding the implementation of age- appropriate sex-related education (SRE) (i.e., abstinence-plus education) in Mississippi public schools.

Methods: Data were used from the first state-level survey of a randomized sample of parents (N = 3,600) of public school students in Mississippi. The sample was relatively equally distributed between non-Hispanic whites (52.8%) and African Americans (48.2%). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine parental support for a number of components associated with comprehensive sex education (i.e., condom use demonstration).

Results: More than 90% of parents endorsed implementing age-appropriate SRE in Mississippi public schools, discussing the transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs during SRE, and discussing how to get tested for HIV/STIs during SRE. More than 80% endorsed discussing where to obtain birth control during SRE and more than 70% endorsed demonstrating correct condom use during SRE. Results varied somewhat across race/ethnicity and gender, such that African American parents who were female were most supportive.

98 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Conclusions: Although Mississippi has been identified as a politically conservative state, our results indicate that an overwhelming majority of surveyed parents endorsed age-appropriate SRE. Results may not be fully generalizable to parents across the nation, yet they are consistent with similar surveys conducted among parents in Minnesota, North Carolina, and Texas to assess attitudes towards school-based sex education. Keywords: Comprehensive sex education; Abstinence-plus education; Abstinence-only education

99 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

INTRODUCTION As of 2011, the teen birth rate in the United States was 31.3 per 1,000 for girls 15-19 years old (CDC, 2013; Hamilton, Mathews & Ventura, 2013). As of 2008, the teen pregnancy rate in the United States was 68 per 1,000 for girls 15- 19 years old (NCPTUP, 2013a). Both rates are considerably higher in the United States than in comparable developed nations (NCPTUP, 2012), as are rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among youth and young adults. As a case in point, it is estimated that although 15-24 year olds represent only one-quarter of ever-sexually active 15-44 year olds in the United States, they acquire nearly one- half of all new STIs each year (Weinstock, Berman & Cates, 2004; CDC, 2012). Other current statistics indicate that resource-limited states in the Southeast such as Mississippi are severely affected by teen pregnancy, teen childbearing, and STIs (NCPTUP, 2013a; Kost & Henshaw, 2013).

For example, Mississippi has the second highest teen birth rate (50.2) in the nation (MSDH, 2011a). It also has the highest gonorrhea rate and the second highest chlamydia rate in the nation (MSDH, 2011b). African American youth in Mississippi are disproportionately at risk for teen pregnancy, teen childbearing, and STIs as compared to white youth (MSDH, 2011a; MSDH, 2011b; NCPTUP, 2013b; Ragsdale & Sutton, 2012). For example, the teen pregnancy rate among Mississippi’s African American youth is 70.6 per 1,000 as compared to 45 per 1,000 among white youth (MSDH, 2011a). Likewise, 75% of gonorrhea cases in Mississippi are among African Americans (who comprise only 37.3% of the population) and 69% are among 15-24 year olds (who comprise only 15% of the population) (MSDH, 2011b; US Census, 2013).

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “teen pregnancy and childbearing bring substantial social and economic costs through immediate and long-term impacts on teen parents and their children” (CDC, 2013 (The Importance of Prevention section, par 1). In Mississippi, the economic cost of teen childbearing has been estimated to be about $154-$159 million annually (NCPTUP, 2013b; MEPC, 2011). The social and public health costs of teen childbearing include low birth weight infants, infant mortality, high school dropout, chronic underemployment, and infants/children growing up in poverty (Basch, 2011).

Although research suggests that comprehensive sex education targeting youth is associated with reduced sexual risk behaviors, pregnancy, childbearing, and STI acquisition (Cavazos-Rehg et al, 2012; Kohler, Manhart & Lafferty, 2008; Vivancos et al, 2013), state and federal support for abstinence-only sex education (AOE) (which is also known as abstinence-only-until-marriage education) is entrenched in the United States (Santelli et al, 2006). According to Kohler and colleagues, comprehensive sex education programs “include abstinence messages, but also provide information on birth control

100 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

methods to prevent pregnancy and condoms to prevent STDs,” while AOE programs advocate sexual abstinence until marriage and “discussion of birth control methods is typically limited to statements about ineffectiveness” (2008, p. 345). State and federal support for AOE is a major concern given that—as the landmark Waxman Report (2004) found—more than 80% of the federally funded AOE programs scrutinized in the report contained “false, misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health…presented as proven scientific facts” (2004i; see also HRW, 2008). Another major concern is that even as the federal government spends an estimated $170 million each year on AOE (SIECUS, 2013a), research suggests it is ineffective in reducing sexual risk behaviors among youth (Basch, 2011; Santelli et al, 2006; Community Preventive Services Task Force, 2013; Kirby, 2007; Mueller, Gavin & Kulkarni, 2008; SIECUS, 2009). Although a number of studies indicate broad public support for comprehensive sex education (Bleakley, Hennessy & Fishbein, 2006; Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006, Tortolero et al, 2011), its implementation remains controversial in the United States (Kohler, Manhart & Lafferty, 2008; Goldman, 2011; Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011). This is noteworthy in light of the fact that many states—including states such as Mississippi that have been identified as politically conservative (Gallup, 2012)—recognize the need for strategies to reduce pregnancy, childbearing, and STIs among youth. In response to this need, the Mississippi State Legislature passed House Bill 999 in 2011, which required that all local school boards adopt a sex-related education policy by June 2012 and that all public school districts implement AOE or abstinence-plus curricula for the 2012-2013 academic year (Mississippi State Legislature, 2011; SIECUS, 2013b). While maintaining that AOE “shall remain the state standard for any sex-related education taught in public schools” (Mississippi State Legislature, 2011, p. 2), the bill also contains restrictions on sex education curricula content—such as prohibiting condom use demonstration. In this paper, we examine results of a state-level survey to assess parental opinions regarding school-based sex education and discuss policy implications for implementing sex-related education. METHODS In response to House Bill 999, the Social Science Research Center (SSRC) of Mississippi State University was commissioned by the Center for Mississippi Health Policy to conduct the first state-level telephone survey of parents (N = 3,600) of public school students in 2011. The survey assessed parental opinions regarding the implementation of sex-related education in Mississippi public schools (McKee et al, 2011).

Using a computer-assisted telephone interview program, data were collected from September through October 2011 by trained interviewers at the SSRC Wolfgang Frese Survey Research Laboratory. The sample was randomly

101 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

selected from a telephone database from the Mississippi Department of Education of all parents in Mississippi with a child enrolled in public school. From this database of 491,540 phone numbers, the SSRC obtained 50,000 phone numbers from which we drew a final randomized sample of 3,600 participants. Eight call attempts were made before a phone number was assigned a final disposition. The sampling error for the total dataset (binomial response option with 50/50 split) was no larger than ± 3.5% with a 95% confidence interval. A finite population correction formula was applied prior to calculating the margin of error. Respondents were not compensated for participation in the 10-minute survey, which had a response rate of 55.2%. All study procedures were approved by the Mississippi State University Institutional Review Board. Measures The 36-item survey collected information on parents’ sociodemographics and opinions regarding implementing sex-related education in Mississippi public schools. For the survey, we drew on House Bill 999 to define sex-related education as abstinence-plus education that includes AOE as defined by the Bill, as well as “information about contraceptives and barrier methods as a means to reduce the risk of pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections and diseases” (McKee et al, 2011). Participants were specifically advised that abstinence-plus education was referred to as sex-related education (SRE). Sociodemographic characteristics Participants were asked to identify the racial/ethnic group(s) that best described them. Therefore, the small subsample racial/ethnic minorities other than African American who completed the survey (2.5%) were excluded from the final analyses. Race/ethnicity was coded as 0 = white and 1 = African American. Gender was coded as 0 = female and 1 = male. Age was a continuous variable. Education was recoded as 0 ≤ four years of high school, 1 = 1-3 years of college, 2 = college graduate, and 3 ≥ 1 year of graduate school. Marital status was recoded as 0 = non-married (i.e., single, cohabiting, separated, divorced, widowed) and 1 = married. Income was recoded as 0 ≤ $20,000, 1 = $20,000- 49,999, 2 = $50,000-74,999, and 3 ≥ $75,000. Participants were asked how many school-aged children (i.e., kindergarteners through twelfth graders) resided in their households and the grade and gender of each child. Participants were also asked whether they had voted in the last major local or national election as of October 2011. Parental opinions regarding age-appropriate SRE “Yes/no,” multiple choice, and Likert-type items were used to assess parental attitudes towards age-appropriate SRE in Mississippi public schools. “Yes/no” items included, “In your opinion, should sex-related education be taught in the

102 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Mississippi public school system at an age-appropriate grade level?” Multiple choice items included, “In your opinion, how should student participation in sex- related education be determined” and response categories included (1) parents should have to sign a form for their child to participate (i.e., active parental consent), (2) children should be automatically enrolled unless the parent provides a written request not to participate (i.e., passive parental consent), (3) don’t know/not sure, and (4) refused. Analysis Plan For the 5-point Likert-type items, parents were asked to indicate their support for 15 items sometimes taught in SRE, such as “How to use a condom correctly through classroom demonstrations.” Item responses ranged from “strongly support” to “strongly oppose” and included “no opinion” as the midpoint. Each item was recoded into three categories, where 1 = support, 2 = no opinion, and 3 = oppose. The 7-point Likert-type item was as follows: “On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being least important and 5 being most important, who do you think should determine the material taught in sex-related education class?” with the following response categories: (1) parents, (2) students, (3) school health councils, (4) principals and teachers, (5) school boards, (6) public health professionals, (7) religious leaders, (8) politicians, and (9) other. Each response category was recoded such that 1 = most important, 2 = neutral, and 3 = least important.

We conducted descriptive analyses (i.e., frequencies, cross tabulations, and correlations) to examine our variables of interest. Pearson correlations were used to determine the strength of an association between variables. We used binominal logistic regression to predict parental attitudes towards age-appropriate SRE using the following coefficients: race/ethnicity (reference category, white), gender (reference category, female), age, education (reference category, ≤ high school degree) and income (reference category, < $20,000). We examined the overall model, individual predictors, and the odds ratio (OR) to determine how each coefficient affected the outcome, using a 95% confidence interval (CI). For the logistic regression models 1-6, all responses of “don't know/not sure” and “refused” were excluded from the final analyses. Analyses were conducting using SPSS 21.0 and significance level was set at p < .05. RESULTS As Table 1 indicates, the sample (N = 3,600) was relatively equally distributed between non-Hispanic whites (52.8%) and African Americans (48.2%), and was relatively representative of Mississippi’s adult population of whites and African Americans (57.7% and 37.3%, respectively) (US Census Bureau, 2013).

The majority of participants were African American females (85.6%), followed by white females (78.9%), white males (21.1%), and African American

103 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

males (14.4%). The mean age of participants was 40.4 years (standard deviation 9.9), of whom 60.9% were married. The age range of respondents’ oldest child was relatively equally distributed, such that 36.1% of respondents’ oldest children were in high school, 31% were in middle school, and 32.9% were in elementary school. The majority of participants had voted in the last major local or national election as of October 2011. Finally, 88.5% of parents ranked public health officials as most important in terms of determining SRE content, followed closely by school health officials (83.5%), parents themselves (74.6%), and principals and teachers (74%). Parents ranked school boards (59.5%), religious leaders (52.5%), and students (45.6%) similarly in terms of importance in determining SRE content, while politicians were ranked a distant last (21.5%). As Table 2 indicates, 92.1% of parents endorsed implementing age- appropriate SRE in Mississippi public schools. Among the minority of parents who did not endorse this item, 4.9% believed that parents should be the ones to teach their children about sexuality, 0.4% believed it is inappropriate to teach adolescents about sex (0.4%), and 0.2% believed that SRE will encourage adolescents to engage in sexual activity. African American males and white males were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .05 and < .001, respectively). In addition, white males were significantly more likely than other parents to select the “not sure” response item (p < .001). Nearly 96% of parents endorsed SRE that instructs students on how to talk with parents about sex and relationship issues. White males were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .05). Nearly 95% of parents endorsed SRE that includes discussing transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs. White males were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .001). More than 91% of parents endorsed SRE that includes discussing how to get tested for HIV/STIs. White males were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .001). Nearly 83% of parents endorsed SRE that instructs students on how to talk with a girlfriend/boyfriend about birth control. Regardless of gender, white parents were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .001 for both groups).

More than 90% of parents endorsed instruction on birth control methods during SRE classes. Again, regardless of gender, white parents were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .001 for both groups). Eighty-two percent of parents endorsed instruction on where to obtain birth control products. African American males and white parents of both genders were significantly less likely to endorse this item (p < .001 for all three groups). More than 72% of parents endorsed demonstrations of correct condom use during SRE. As Table 2 indicates, white males were less likely to endorse this item (p < .001). Nearly 61% of parents endorsed gender-segregated SRE classes. Regardless of gender, white parents were significantly more likely to endorse this item (p < .05 for both groups). Nearly 55% of parents endorsed active parental consent for children to

104 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

participate in SRE (i.e., parent should have to sign a form for the child to receive SRE). White males were more likely to endorse active parental consent (p < .001). Finally, parents ranked public health officials as most important in terms of determining the content of SRE, followed closely by school health officials (83.5%), parents themselves (74.6%), and principals and teachers (74%). Parents ranked school boards (59.5%), religious leaders (52.5%), and students (45.6%) similarly in terms of importance in determining the content of SRE, while politicians were ranked a distant last (21.5%).

105 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of study sample (N = 3,600)

Socioeconomic Demographics Should Sex-related Education be Taught in the Public School System?

Participants Frequency % Yes No Not Sure

Significance

Sex p < .001

Female 2,950 81.9 93.5 4.9 1.6

Male 650 18.1 85.8 9.8 4.3

Race/Ethnicity p < .001

White 1,800 51.8 87.7 9.4 3.5

African American 1,675 48.2 97.6 1.9 0.5

Income Level p < .001

Below 20,000 901 29.9 95.7 3.2 1.1

20,000 to 49,999 1,108 36.7 93.6 4.7 1.7

50,000 to 74,999 449 14.9 87.8 9.6 2.7

Above 75,000 560 18.6 89.8 6.8 3.4

Education Level p = .05

≥ High School education 1,389 38.7 93.4 4.8 3.8

1-3 years of College 1,095 30.5 91.4 6.2 2.4

College Graduate 691 19.3 92.2 5.2 2.6

≥ 1 year graduate school 411 11.5 89.3 9.2 1.5

Age (Years)

18 to 29 377 10.5 95.2 4.2 0.5

30 to 34 718 19.9 94.4 4.2 1.4

35 to 39 742 20.6 92.7 5.1 2.2

40 to 44 673 18.7 90.6 6.7 2.7

45 to 54 763 21.2 89.5 7.3 3.1

55 and Older 327 9.1 90.8 7.3 1.8

Voted Last Major Electiona

Yes 2,974 82.8 93.3 5.0 1.7 p < .001

No 619 17.2 85.1 10.8 4.1

Marital Status

Married 2,193 61.1 89.8 7.4 2.7 p < .001

Cohabiting 77 2.1 94.8 2.6 2.6

Single 654 18.2 97.2 2.1 0.6

Separated, Divorced or Widowed 664 18.5 94.3 4.2 1.5

Totalb 3,600 100 92.1 5.8 2.1

* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.

106 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

a Voted in last major election as of October 2011. b Totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.

Table 2. Items that were significant by race/ethnicity and by gender.

Should age-appropriate sex-related education be taught in Mississippi public schools?

N Yes % No %

No Opinion

% *Significance

African American 1,675 p< .05

Female 1,434 97.9 1.6 0.5 Male 241 95.4 3.7 1.08 White 1,800 p < .001 Female 1,420 89.2 8.1 2.7 Male 380 79.2 14.2 6.6* Do you support teaching students how to talk to parents about sex and relationship issues during age-appropriate sex-related education?

N Yes % No %

No Opinion

% *Significance

African American 1,673

Female 1,433 98.2 1.1 0.7 Male 240 97.1 2.5 0.4 White 1,795 p < .05 Female 1,415 94.4 4.2 1.4 Male 380 90.5 7.9 1.6 Do you discussion on how to talk with boyfriend/girlfriend about birth control?

N Yes % No %

No Opinion

% *Significance

African American 1,670

Female 1,431 89.0 8.4 2.6 Male 239 86.6 10.0 3.3 White 1,779 p < .001 Female 1,404 80.4 15.3 4.3 Male 375 66.9 28.5 4.5

107 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Do you support teaching about birth control methods during age-appropriate sex-related education?

N Yes No No Opinion *Significance % % %

African American

1,671

Female 1,431 94.7 3.9 1.4 Male 240 90.8 6.7 2.5 White 1,788 p < .001 Female 1,411 88.6 8.6* 2.8 Male 377 79.6 17.5* 2.9 Do you support teaching where to obtain birth control products during age-appropriate sex-related education?

N Yes No No Opinion *Significance % % %

African American

1,670 p = .001

Female 1,430 89.2 7.8 3.0 Male 240 80.8 12.5 6.7 White 1,781 p < .001 Female 1,407 79.4 16.7 3.9 Male 374 65.5 30.2 4.3 Should correct condom use be demonstrated during age-appropriate sex-related education?

N Yes No No Opinion *Significance % % %

African American 1,660 p < .01

Female 1,425 83.0 13.1 3.9 Male 235 74.9 20.0 5.1 White 1,764 p < .001 Female 1,390 65.5 28.2 6.3 Male 374 52.7 40.6 6.7

108 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

Should classes be gender-segregated during age-appropriate sex-related education?

N Yes No No Opinion *Significance % % %

African American 1,675 Female 1,434 45.9 49.1 5.0 Male 241 48.5 46.1 5.4 White 1,800 p < .05 Female 1,420 76.0 17.6 6.4 Male 380 71.6 23.7 4.7 How should student participation in age-appropriate sex-related education be determined?

N

Active Parental

Passive Parental Not Sure/

*Significance Consenta Consentb Refused % % % African American 1,675 Female 1,434 52.1 46.7 1.3 Male 241 55.2 42.7 2.1 White 1,800 p < .001 Female 1,420 54.7 43.8 1.5 Male 380 65.0 34.5 0.06 * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.

a Parent should have to sign a form for child to participate in SRE. b Child should be automatically enrolled in SRE unless parent provides written request

that child not participate. Binomial Regression Predicting Parental Support for Age-Appropriate SRE In order to predict parental support for SRE, we devised six logistic regression models using five dependent variables (race/ethnicity, gender, age, education, and income). All five variables were significant predictors of parental support for SRE. Race/ethnicity was significant at p < .001 in models 1, 4 and 5 and significant at p < .01 in model 2. Gender was significant at p < .001 in models 1, 4 and 5 and significant at p < .01 in models 2 and 3. Age was significant at p < .001 in models 4 and 5 and significant at p < .05 in model 3. Education was significant at p < .001 in model 6, significant at p < .01 in model 5, and significant at p < .05 in model 6. Income was significant at p < .001 in models 3 through 6, significant

109 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

at p < .01 in models 4 and 5, and significant at p < .05 in model 1, 4 and 6. These results are discussed in detail below and included in Tables 3 and 4.

In model 1, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for implementing SRE in Mississippi. Among the 3,524 participants who responded to the question, “Should sex-related education be taught in Mississippi schools?,” 94.1% responded “yes” (n = 3,315). As compared to white parents, African American parents were more likely to support SRE implementation in Mississippi (OR = 5.20, 95% CI = 3.29-8.22, p < .001). As compared to female parents, male parents were less likely to support SRE (OR = .46, 95% CI = .32- .66, p < .001). As compared to parents with incomes below $20,000, those with incomes of $50,000-74,999 were less likely to support SRE (OR = .68, 95% CI = .51-.91, p < .05).

In model 2, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for discussing the transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs during SRE. Among the 3,498 participants who responded to the question, “Do you support teaching about the transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs?” 94.9% responded “yes” (n = 3,321). As compared to white parents, African American parents were more likely to support this item (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.24-2.64, p < .01). As compared to female parents, male parents were less likely to support this item (OR = .55, 95% CI = .37-.80, p < .01).

In model 3, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for discussing how to get tested for HIV/STIs during SRE. Among the 3,511 participants who responded to the question, “Do you support teaching about getting tested for HIV/STIs?,” 93.2% responded “yes” (n =3,273). As compared to white parents, African American parents were more likely to support this item (OR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.92-4.11, p < .001). As compared to female parents, male parents were less likely to support this item (OR = .62, 95% CI = .44-.87, p < .01). As compared to younger parents, older parents were less likely to support this item (OR = .98, 95% CI = .96-1.0, p < .05). As compared to parents with incomes below $20,000, those with incomes of $50,000-74,999 were less likely to support this item (OR = .38, 95% CI = .22-.66, p < .001) as were those with incomes of ≥ $75,000 (OR = .34, 95% CI = .20-.59, p < .001).

In model 4, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for discussing where to obtain birth control during SRE. Among the 3,440 participants who responded to the question, “Do you support teaching about where to obtain birth control products?,” 85.3% responded “yes” (n = 2,933). As compared to white parents, African American parents were more likely to support this item (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.56-2.54, p < .001). As compared to female parents, male parents were less likely to support this item (OR = .55, 95% CI = .43-.70, p < .001). As compared to younger parents, older

110 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al.

parents were less likely to support this item (OR = .98, 95% CI = .97-.99, p < .001). As compared to parents with incomes below $20,000, those with incomes of $20,000-49,999 were less likely to support this item (OR = .70, 95% CI = .51-.96, p < .05), as were those with incomes of $50,000-74,999 (OR = .56, 95% CI = .38- .82, p < .01) and those with incomes of ≥ $75,000 (OR = .43, 95% CI = .30-.63, p < .001).

In model 5, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for demonstrating correct condom use during SRE. Among the 3,361 participants who responded to the question, “Do you support teaching correct condom use demonstrations?” 76.2% responded “yes” (n = 2,560). As compared to white parents, African American parents were more likely to support the item (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.97-2.96, p < .001). As compared to female parents, male parents were less likely to support the item (OR = .64, 95% CI = .51-.81, p < .001). As compared to younger parents, older parents were less likely to support the item (OR = .98, 95% CI = .97-.99, p < .001). As compared to parents with ≤ high school education, those who had ≥ 1 year of graduate school were less likely to support the item (OR = .61, 95% CI = .44-.83, p < .01). As compared to parents with incomes below $20,000, those with incomes of $50,000-74,999 were less likely to support this item (OR = .62, 95%, CI = .45-.85, p < .01) as were those with incomes of ≥ $75,000 (OR = .55, 95% CI = .40-.75, p < .001).

In model 6, we explored which dependent variables predicted parental support for segregating students by gender during SRE. Among the 3,399 participants who responded to the question, “Should classes be gender-segregated during sex-related education?,” 64.5% responded “yes” (n = 2,194). As compared to white parents, African American parents were less likely to support this item (OR = 2.863, 95% CI = .22-.32, p < .001). As compared to parents with ≤ high school education, those who had 1-3 years of college were more likely to support this item (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.25-1.89, p < .001), as were those who were college graduates (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.0-1.66, p < .05) and those with ≥ 1 year of graduate school (OR =1.87, 95% CI =1.37-2.56, p < .001). As compared to parents with incomes below $20,000, those with incomes of $20,000-49,999 were more likely to support this item (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.03-1.55, p < .05), as were those with incomes of $50,000-74,999 (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.10-1.97, p < .05), and those with incomes of ≥ $75,000 (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.35-2.48, p < .001).

111 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

Table 3. Binomial Regression Predicting Parental Support for Sex-Related Education in Mississippi Public Schools

At an age-appropriate grade level, in your opinion should: Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Sex-related education be taught in Mississippi public schools

Classes be gender-segregated during sex-related education

Teaching correct condom use be demonstrated during sex-related education

Predictors B (SE) OR (95% CI) B (SE) OR (95% CI) B (SE) OR (95% CI)

Intercept 2.76 (.23) 1.06 (.21) 1.38 (.13

African American 1.65 (.23)*** 5.20 (3.29-8.22) -1.33 (.09)*** 2.63 (.22-.32) .88 (.10)*** 2.41 (1.97-2.96)

Male -.77 (.19)*** .46 (.32-.66) - .14 (.11) .87 (.69-1.08) -.44 (.12)*** .64 (.51-.81)

Age (centered) -.01 (.01) .99 (.97-1.0) -.00 (.00) 1.0 (.99-1.01) -.02 (.01)*** .98 (.97-.99)

1-3 years of college - .06 (.21) .94 (.62-1.43) .43 (.11)*** 1.53 (1.25-1.89) -.20 (.12) .82 (.65-1.04)

College graduate .16 (.27) 1.17 (.69-1.98) .25 (.13)* 1.29 (1.0-1.66) -.23 (.14) .79 (.60-1.05)

≥1 year of graduate school -.44 (.27) .64 (.38-1.10) .63 (.16)*** 1.87 (1.37-2.56) -.50 (.16)** .61 (.44-.83)

Income: $20,000-49,999 -.09 (.25) .91 (.55-1.50) .24 (.10)* 1.26 (1.03-1.55) -.17 (.13) .84 (.65-1.09)

Income: $50,000-74,999 -.60 (.28)* .55 (.32-.94) .39 (.15)* 1.47 (1.10-1.97) -.48 (.16)** .62 (.45-.85)

Income: ≥$75,000 -.01 (.30) .99 (.55-1.78) .60 (.16)*** 1.83 (1.35-2.48) -.60 (.16)*** .55 (.40-.75)

112 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

Table 4. Binomial Regression Predicting Parental Support for Sex-Related Education in Mississippi Public Schools At an age-appropriate grade level, do you support discussing:

Model 4 Model 5 Model 6

Where to obtain birth control products during sex-related education

How to get tested for HIV/STIs during sex-related education

Discussing the transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs

Predictors B (SE) OR (95% CI) B (SE) OR (95% CI) B (SE) OR (95% CI)

Intercept 2.11 (.15) 2.90 (.23) 3.21 (.24)

African American .69 (.12)*** 1.99 (1.56-2.54) 1.03 (.20)*** 2.81 (1.92-4.11) .59 (.19)** 1.81 (1.24-2.64)

Male -.60 (.13)*** .55 (.43-.70) -.48 (.18)** .62 (.44-.87) -.61 (.20)** .55 (.37-.80)

Age (centered) -.02 (.01)*** .98 (.97-.99) -.02 (.01)* .98 (.96-1.0) -.00 (.01) 1.0 (.98-1.01)

1-3 years of college -.03 (.14) .97 (.73-1.28) .26 (.21) 1.29 (.86-1.93) - .23 (.21) .80 (.52-1.21)

College graduate .04 (.17) 1.04 (.75-1.45) .19 (.23) 1.21 (.76-1.91) .06 (.27) 1.06 (.63-1.81)

≥1 year of graduate school -.18 (.19) .84 (.58-1.21) .21 (.27) 1.24 (.73-2.09) -.16 (.30) .85 (.47-1.53)

Income: $20,000-49,999 -.36 (.16)* .70 (.51-.96) -.33 (.26) .72 (.44-1.19) -.43 (.25) .65 (.40-1.05)

Income: $50,000-74,999 -.58 (.20)** .56 (.38-.82) -.97 (.28)*** .38 (.22-.66) -.28 (.31) .76 (.41-1.39)

Income: ≥$75,000 -.84 (.19)*** .43 (.30-.63) -1.08 (.28)*** .34 (.20-.59) -.37 (.31) .69 (.38-1.25)

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.

113 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

DISCUSSION Our results indicate that an overwhelming majority of surveyed parents (92.1%) endorsed implementing age-appropriate SRE (i.e., abstinence-plus education) in Mississippi public schools. This support is noteworthy given that local school boards chose to adopt AOE in 52.3% of Mississippi’s 155 public school districts (n = 81 districts) (MS Kids Count, 2013). In contrast, local school boards adopted abstinence-plus education in 74 school districts and a combination of AOE for younger students and abstinence-plus for older students in 3 school districts (MS Kids Count, 2013). As mandated by House Bill 999, each district’s local school board was the decision-maker on whether schools in that district adopted AOE or abstinence-plus education. Our results suggest that the decision of just over 50% of local school boards to adopted AOE may not adequately reflect the desire of parents in those school districts for abstinence-plus education. Although the overwhelming majority of parents were in favor of this item, support varied somewhat across race/ethnicity, gender, and income. For example, African American parents were more likely to support implementing SRE as compared to white parents. In contrast, male parents were less likely to support SRE implementation as compared to female parents, as were parents with incomes of $50,000-74,999 as compared to parents with incomes below $20,000.

More than 90% of surveyed parents endorsed discussing the transmission and prevention of HIV/STIs during SRE, although support varied somewhat across race/ethnicity and gender. African American parents were more likely to support this item as compared to white parents, while male parents were less likely to support the item as compared to female parents. More than 90% of surveyed parents endorsed discussing how to get tested for HIV/STIs during SRE, although support varied somewhat across race/ethnicity, gender, age, and income. African American parents were more likely to support discussing how to get tested for HIV/STIs during SRE as compared to white parents. In contrast, male parents and parents who were older were less likely to support the item as compared to female parents and those who were younger. Parents with incomes $50,000 or higher were also less likely to support the item as compared to parents with incomes below $20,000.

Although AOE program guidelines “explicitly prohibit any discussion of contraceptives, except for failure rates” (Advocates for Youth, 2013, p. 1), more than 80% of surveyed parents endorsed discussing where to obtain birth control during SRE, which is consistent with other research on public opinion regarding sex education in US schools (Bleakley, Hennessy & Fishbein, 2006; Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006, Tortolero et al, 2011). Support varied somewhat across race/ethnicity, gender, age, and income. African American parents were more likely to support this item as compared to white parents. In contrast, male parents and parents who were older were less likely to support the item as compared to female parents and those who were younger. Parents with incomes of $20,000 or higher were also less likely to support this item as compared to parents with incomes below $20,000. Condom use demonstrations during SRE are explicitly banned by House Bill 999, yet more than 70% of surveyed parents endorsed demonstrating correct condom use during SRE. Support varied somewhat across all five of our predictor variables. African American parents were more likely to support this item as compared to white parents. In contrast, male parents and

114 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

parents who were older were less likely to support the item as compared to female parents and those who were younger. In terms of education, only parents in the highest education bracket were less likely to support the item as compared to parents with ≤ high school education. Parents with incomes of $50,000 or higher were less likely to support this item as compared to parents with incomes below $20,000. An additional mandate of House Bill 999 is that SRE classes are segregated by gender. More than 60% of surveyed parents endorsed gender-segregated SRE, although support varied somewhat across race/ethnicity, education, and income. African American parents were less likely to support this item as compared to white parents. In contrast, parents with 1 year of college or more were more likely to support this item as compared to parents with ≤ high school education. In addition, parents with incomes of $20,000 or higher more were more likely to support this item as compared to parents with incomes below $20,000.

When taken as a whole, these results suggest that—regardless of race/ethnicity or gender—surveyed parents reported overwhelming support for age-appropriate SRE in Mississippi public schools and that such sex education should include discussion of HIV/STI prevention, HIV/STI testing, and where to obtain birth control. Surveyed parents reported strong support for demonstrating correct condom use and they reported majority support for segregating students by gender during SRE. African American parents who were female were the most supportive of the first 5 items, while they were the least supportive of gender-segregated SRE. Given that African American youth in Mississippi are disproportionately at risk for teen pregnancy, teen childbearing, and STIs as compared to white youth (NCPTUP, 2013a; MSDH, 2011a; MSDH, 2011b; NCPTUP, 2013b; Ragsdale & Sutton, 2012), it is possible that African American parents in the present sample—and particularly African American mothers—were more likely to recognize the importance of comprehensive sex education for their children. Limitations The study’s findings must be considered in light of its limitations and strengths. Consistent with the literature on sex-related research (Ragsdale, DiFrancesco & Pinkerton, 2006; Ragsdale et al, 2009) participants who were more comfortable discussing sexually sensitive topics may have been overrepresented in the sample. Consistent with similar telephone surveys among parents that focused on school-based sex education (Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006; Lagus et al, 2011), female parents and those with more than four years of college were overrepresented in the present study. The sexually sensitive nature of the survey may have contributed to underrepresentation of male parents, and may be associated with fathers’ lack of or discomfort with engaging in communication about sex with their children (Harris et al, 2013; Miller et al, 2013; Ragsdale et al, 2013; Wilson, Dalberth & Koo, 2010). Indeed, studies on parent-adolescent sexual communication have found that sexual communication is far more common with mothers (Harris et al, 2013; Ragsdale et al, 2013; Wilson, Dalberth & Koo, 2010) and that fathers report more discomfort (Miller et al, 2013; Wilson, Dalberth & Koo, 2010). In the present study, such discomfort may have contributed to fathers’ reluctance to participate. Another contributor to male underrepresentation may be that females are often the primary caregivers of school-aged children and, therefore, may have been overrepresented in the original telephone database. Finally, our results must be interpreted with caution given that participant misreporting is common in interview-assisted surveys of a sensitive nature (Tourangeau & Yan, 2007).

115 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

In terms of strengths, this is the first state-level survey among a randomized sample of Mississippi parents of public school students to assess their opinions regarding abstinence-plus education. In contrast to similar studies in the United States (Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006; Lagus et al, 2011), it is noteworthy that minority parents, those with less educational attainment, and those with lower income were adequately represented in the present study. For example, African Americans—who account for 37.3% of Mississippi’s adult population— accounted for 48.2% of survey respondents. Although results may not be fully generalizable to parents across the nation or in other countries, our results are consistent with similar telephone surveys conducted among parents in Minnesota, North Carolina, and Texas to assess attitudes towards school-based sex education (Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006; Lagus et al, 2011; Tortolero et al, 2011). Our results are also compelling in light of the fact that—although Mississippi has been identified as the fourth most politically conservative state in the nation (Gallup, 2013) — surveyed parents were overwhelming in support of age-appropriate SRE. CONCLUSION We believe that predicting parental support for SRE has important policy implications for Mississippi and other states that have been identified as politically conservative. For example, although local school boards in Mississippi voted in 2012 to adopt AOE in just over 50% of school districts, surveyed parents were overwhelming supportive of sex education topics well- aligned with comprehensive sex education. These findings are instructive for implementing evidence-based sex education in Mississippi, as they are reflective of national public preference for “broad sex education curriculum that stresses abstinence as the best way to avoid unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) but that also conveys complete and medically accurate information about contraception and condoms” (Advocates for Youth, 2007, p.1) (see also Bleakley, Hennessy & Fishbein, 2006; Eisenberg et al, 2008; Ito et al, 2006; Tortolero et al, 2011). Given that AOE has been implemented in over 50% of Mississippi school districts, we also recommend that future research should—as mandated by House Bill 999— compare findings from school districts that have adopted AOE versus abstinence-plus education in order to evaluate the effect of these two programs on teen pregnancy rates and dropout rates due to teen pregnancy at the local and state levels. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Data collection was supported by the Center for Mississippi Health Policy and preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Social Science Research Center (SSRC) of Mississippi State University (MSU) and the MSU Division of Agriculture, Forestry & Veterinary Medicine (DAFVM). We gratefully acknowledge Therese Hanna of the Center for Mississippi Health Policy, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Women’s Fund of Mississippi, Arthur G. Cosby of the SSRC, John Edwards of the SSRC Wolfgang Frese Survey Research Laboratory, and the MSU DAFVM for their support and assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge Troy Blanchard and Ben Walker for their valuable contributions to the project.

116 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

REFERENCES Advocates for Youth. Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs: Ineffective, Unethical, and

Poor Public Health. 2013. Retrieved July 13, 2013 from http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/597.

Basch CE. Teen pregnancy and the achievement gap among urban minority youth. J Sch Health. 2011;81(10):614-618.

Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Fishbein M. Public opinion on sex education in US schools. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(11):1151-1156.

Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Spitznagel EL, Iguchi M, Schootman M, Cottler L, Grucza RA, Bierut LJ. Associations between sexuality education in schools and adolescent birthrates: a state-level longitudinal model. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(2):134-140.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About teen pregnancy: teen pregnancy in the United States. 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/aboutteenpreg.htm. Accessed: May 16, 2013.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance,

2011. 2012. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/. Accessed: April 15, 2013.

Community Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing HIV/AIDS, other STIs, and pregnancy: group-based abstinence education interventions for adolescents. 2013. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/hiv/abstinence_ed.html. Accessed: May 30, 2013.

Eisenberg ME, Bernat DH, Bearinger LH, Resnick MD. Support for comprehensive sexuality parents of school-age youth. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(4):352-359.

Gallup. State of the states: Alabama, North Dakota, Wyoming most conservative states. 2013. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/160196/alabama-north-dakota-wyoming- conservative-states.aspx. Accessed: July 23, 2013.

Goldman JD. An exploration in health education of an integrated theoretical basis for sexuality education pedagogies for young people. Health Educ Res. 2011;26:526-541.

Hamilton BE, Mathews TJ, Ventura SJ. Declines in state teen birth rates by race and Hispanic origin. 2013. NCHS data brief, no 123. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013.

Harris AL, Sutherland MA, Hutchinson MK. Parental influences of sexual risk among urban African American adolescent males. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013. Mar 1. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12016. [Epub ahead of print]

Human Rights Watch (HRW). Written testimony of Center for Reproductive Rights and Human Rights Watch to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on the human rights concerns of abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. 2008. Available at: 4.2008 CRR__HRW_Abstinence_Only_Testimony0408-1. Accessed: May 30, 2013.

Ito KE, Gizlice Z, Owen-O’Dowd J, Foust E, Leone PA, Miller, WC. Parent opinion of sexuality education in a state with mandated abstinence education: does policy match parental preference? J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:634-641.

117 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

Kirby D, ed. Emerging answers 2007: research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease. 2007. Washington, D.C.: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Kohler PK, Manhart LE, Lafferty WE. Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42:344-351.

Kost K, Henshaw S. U.S. teenage pregnancies, births and abortions, 2008: State trends by age,

race and ethnicity. 2013. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends13.pdf. Accessed: May 20, 2013.

Lagus KA, Bernat DH, Bearinger LH, Resnick MD, Eisenberg ME. Parental perspectives on sources of sex information for young people. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49(1):87-9.

Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B.E., Ventura, S.J., Osterman, M.J.K., Kirmeyer, S., Wilson, E., & Matthews, T.J. Births: Final Data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2012;61(1). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf. Accessed: April 15, 2013.

McKee C, Southward LH, Dunaway M. Blanchard T, Walker B. Parental survey on sex education in Mississippi: implications for House Bill 999, 2011. 2011. Center for Mississippi Health Policy. Available at: http://stage.mshealthpolicy.com/wp- content/uploads/2012/06/Sex-EdFinalReport2-9-12_000.pdf. Accessed: June 10, 2012.

Miller ME, Ruzek SB, Bass SB, Gordon TF, Ducette JP. Why fathers are too important to ignore: communication about sexuality between fathers and daughters. Holist Nurs Pract. 2013;27(2):89-97.

Mississippi Economic Policy Center (MEPC). Economic Impact of Teen Births in Mississippi. 2011. Available at: http://mepconline.org/fact-sheet-economic-impact-of-teen-births-in- mississippi. Accessed: May 29, 2013.

Mississippi KIDS COUNT Databook. 2013. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Available at: http://kidscount.ssrc.msstate.edu/data/mississippi-kids-count/ms-data-books/.

Mississippi State Department of Health. Mississippi STD Facts, 2011. 2011b. Available at: http://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,150.html. Accessed: May 29, 2013.

Mississippi State Department of Health. Vital Statistics Mississippi, 2011. 2011a. Available at: http://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/31,0,75,522.html. Accessed: May 29, 2013.

Mississippi State Legislature. House Bill 999, 2011. 2011. Available at: http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2011/pdf/HB/0900-0999/HB0999SG.pdf. Accessed: July 16, 2012.

Mueller TE, Gavin LE, Kulkarni A. The association between sex education and youth's engagement in sexual intercourse, age at first intercourse, and birth control use at first sex. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(1):89-96.

National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (NCPTUP). State data: advanced

state comparisons. 2013a. Available at: http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/state- data/default.aspx. Accessed: April 3, 2013.

National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (NCPTUP). Fast facts: how does the United States compare? 2012. Available at:

118 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/national-data/teen-pregnancy-birth-rates.aspx. Accessed: April 3, 2013.

National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (NCPTUP). 50-state and national comparisons. 2013b. Available at: http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/state-data/state- comparisions.asp?id=3&sID=23. Accessed: 29 May 2013.

Ragsdale K, Bersamin MM, Schwartz SJ, Zamboanga BL, Kerrick MR, Grube JW. Development of sexual expectancies among adolescents: contributions by parents, peers and the media. J Sex Res. 2013 Apr 30. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.753025.

Ragsdale K, Difranceisco W, Pinkerton SD. Where the boys are: sexual expectations and behaviour among young women on holiday. Cult Health Sex. 2006;8(2):85-98.

Ragsdale K, Gore-Felton C, Koopman C, Seal DW. Relationship power, acculturation, and sexual risk behavior among low-income Latinas of Mexican or Puerto Rican ethnicity. Sex Res Social Policy. 2009;6(1):56-69.

Ragsdale K, Sutton L. Policy scan: risk factors and health status of Mississippi youth, 2012. 2012. Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University.

Santelli J, Ott MA, Lyon M, Rogers J, Summers D, Schleifer R. Abstinence and abstinence-only education: a review of U.S. policies and programs. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(1):72-81.

Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS). The five most egregious uses of welfare’s Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage funds. 2013a. Available at: http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageId=524&grandparentI D=477&parentID=523. Accessed: May 30, 2013.

Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS). Fact Sheet: what the research says about abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. 2009. Available at: http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageId=524&grandparentI D=477&parentID=523. Accessed: May 30, 2013.

Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS). Understanding

Mississippi’s new sexuality education law, 2012. 2013b. Available at: http://www.womensfundms.org/documents/MississippiSexEducationLawFactSheet.pdf. Accessed: April 15, 2013.

Stanger-Hall KF, Hall DW. Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. Plos Medicine. 2011;4:e275. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024658. Accessed: June 10, 2012.

Tortolero SR, Johnson K, Peskin M, Cuccaro PM, Markham C, Hernandez BF, Addy RC, Shegog R, Li DH. Dispelling the myth: what parents really think about sex education in schools. J Appl Res Child. 2011. Available at: http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol2/iss2/5. Accessed: June 10, 2012.

Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859-83

119 What do Parents in Mississippi Really Think About Sex Education in Schools? …

-McKee et al

United States Census Bureau. State & County QuickFacts: Mississippi. 2013. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/28000.html. Accessed: May 29, 2013.

Vivancos R, Abubakar I, Phillips-Howard P, Hunter PR. School-based sex education is associated with reduced risky sexual behaviour and sexually transmitted infections in young adults. Public Health. 2013;127(1):53-57.

Waxman, HA. The content of federally funded abstinence-only education programs. 2004. US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff Special Investigations Division. Available at: www.apha.org/apha/PDFs/HIV/The_Waxman_Report.pdf . Accessed: May 30, 2013.

Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W Jr. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates. 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(1):6-10.

Wilson EK, Dalberth BT, Koo HP. "We're the heroes!": fathers' perspectives on their role in protecting their preteenage children from sexual risk. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Jun;42(2):117-124.

Copyright of Journal of Health Disparities Research & Practice is the property of Michelle Chino, Ph.D. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.