Intersexuality

profileHarlemGem
WGSReflectionandResponseEssayAssignment.docx

Reflection Paper Instructions: The Challenges of Masculinity or Intersexuality and Transgender Experiences

· final copy with revisions accomplished, due to Bb by Sunday, Oct 20 by midnight.

An assignment such as this generally requires approximately 3 pp., double spaced pages using 12 inch font and 1 inch margins.

In terms of presenting your ideas, your introductory paragraph must identify the topic you chose and the two essays you will discuss in the rest of the paper. The introduction, as always, must contain an effective thesis, which will state in clear language what you will emphasize about this topic and the two essays you'll discuss. Be sure the thesis isn't an obvious statement, but rather one that expresses a strong view of the topic. Review the sample essay about Intersexualtiy written by a student from a previous semester that I've posted here to help you see what an effective introduction and body look like for this assignment.

For the body, I suggest that you either discuss one work first and then transition to the next, etc., OR choose one topic that the authors write about in both works and discuss each essay's perspective on that topic, then move onto another topic, etc. The text-by-text approach is probably easier in terms of organizing and developing your work. 

OR, choose to write about intersexuality or transgender experiences (write about two of the texts by either Fausto-Sterling and Coventry (intersexuality). (Taylor, Serano or Bornstein write about transgender experiences, not yet covered in class.)

Your essay should consist of both summary and response. You will quote at least once from each text, explaining that quotation in your own words, and indicating on which page the quotation appears using MLA citation format.

Links to Articles

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/21a4/4d10b40354a974c8d1d3a9a0e66fef731e75.pdf

https://www.ontheissuesmagazine.com/1998summer/su98coventry.php

What exactly do I need help with?

I need my essay edited for grammar mistakes. I need help with organization and making sure my thesis is good. I need some work the conclusion. I also need some help with making sure my in text citations are correct. When I write about Conventry’s article toward the end of essay, I did not in text cite at all so I need help with that as well. Also I need both articles “work cited”. It is due by Oct 20, 2019 at midnight. I would like it completed by 5pm Eastern Standard Time on Oct 20 please. This is the grading rubric. I need an A on this paper .

RUBRIC for GRADING

 

Accomplished

Proficient

Developing

Beginning

Thesis Development

 

Very effective thesis that controls the organization and development of the essay. The thesis’ claim is highly original, expressing an idea about the topic that is not obvious in nature.

 

Clear thesis that controls the organization and development of the essay. The thesis’ claim is not obvious.

 

Adequate thesis, but its focus may lapse, logical connections may be missing, or its claim may be obvious.

Unclear, jumbled, or unstated thesis. Doesn't adequately address the writing assignment or addresses some parts but only superficially. Focus and coherence are either not evident or sustained.

 

 

Body of the Essay

Demonstrates strong to superior critical understanding of required texts through accurate paraphrases and summaries, well-chosen direct quotations, and the full explanation of themes and tropes. Paraphrases will be more common than summaries. Paraphrases, summaries, and direct quotations will be concretely and expediently contextualized and relevant both to the immediate and the overall argument.

Demonstrates accurate understanding of required texts through appropriate summaries, explanations, and analyses, although these may be less than complete. Summaries will be more common than paraphrases. Paraphrases, summaries, and direct quotations will be inelegantly contextualized but still relevant both to the immediate and overall argument.

Demonstrates partial understanding of required texts through summaries or explanations, but the exposition of tropes and/or themes will be faulty. Paraphrases will be infrequent or absent. Direct quotations may not relate to the immediate argument. There will be little contextualization of quoted, summarized, or paraphrased material.

Demonstrates little to no understanding of required literary texts. Quotations will be missing, haphazard, out of context and/or detrimental to the immediate or overall argument. Paper may be mostly summary and direct quotation.

Interpretation of the Text

 

Presents and explores sophisticated and complex ideas developed through insightful reasoning and relevant supporting details. Conclusions and implications are logical and reflect the student’s ability to analyze the text with originality and rigor.

 

Presents and explores increasingly complex ideas through deliberate reasoning and appropriate details. Conclusions and implications are logically tied to evidence and reflect the student’s ability to analyze the text with thoughtfulness.

Presents ideas of some complexity, using adequate reasoning and details. Conclusions and implications are logically tied to evidence (often because the evidence is chosen to fit the desired conclusion) and reflect the student’s ability to analyze the text with intentionality.

Addresses only some parts of the writing assignment or addresses some parts superficially. Presents simplistic ideas with only modest use of details to explain or support ideas. Conclusions are inconsistently tied to evidence or are absent entirely, with little attempt made to analyze the text.

Organization

The paper’s organization enhances the development of the thesis through logically structured paragraphs, clear topic sentences, and logical, graceful transitions.

The paper’s organization contributes to the development of the thesis through coherent paragraphs, the presence of topic sentences, and attempts at transitions.

The paper’s organization works to support the development of the thesis through discernible paragraphs and attempts at topic sentences. Transitions may be missing.

The paper’s organization is jumbled or sloppy and may even impede the development of the thesis. Paragraphs may not be discernible or logically structured. Topic sentences may be missing or confusing. Transitions are likely missing.

Format, Grammar and Usage

Paper meets all requirements, including length and MLA style rules. The student’s writing evidences strong control of grammar, syntax and mechanics, with rare lapses in the use of standard English conventions of grammar, punctuation, and usage. Correctly applies a sophisticated, precise vocabulary and varied sentence structure.

Paper may not meet some requirements (such as being too short and therefore superficial, or going too far over) and MLA style. The student’s writing communicates clearly, with only minor, infrequent and not jarring problems in standard English conventions of grammar, punctuation, and usage.

Paper does not meet the requirements but still manages to present a recognizably complete essay. The student’s writing communicates adequately but there are major problems in using standard English conventions of grammar, punctuation, (without undermining the communication of ideas).

Paper does not meet the requirements and is obviously deficient as a result. The student’s writing is unfocused and unclear, with consistent, major problems in grammar, punctuation, and usage that impede communication of ideas.