Biology - Physiology Week two: Assignment two Instructions and Rubric. 5-7 PAGES
dream86
WeektwoProjectPaperAssignmenttwoHM.docxWeek two: Assignment two Instructions and Rubric
Write a paper which addresses a work project of your choosing by using the tools discussed in Competency 3 (starts on pg. 128) page may vary with newer book. You must choose at least one tool to organize the work for the tasks to be accomplished. Include the assignments and timelines associated with getting the work accomplished. Demonstrate planning through narratives and charts, diagrams, and figures, etc.
· Describe a work project or a simulated one and how it gets accomplished using best practices.
1. Discuss cross functional membership and why members were chosen. Do not use your experience as the basis or evidence for the paper, but what does the literature say?
2. Incorporate one tool described in this section of the text (Module 2, Competency 3). It is referred to in the text but put in an Appendix of the paper. It is titled properly according to APA format.
· Think about which people should be assigned, and their professional goals, which you have considered in making the assignments. Also, what problems may be associated with team members.
· Paper should be between 5-7 pgs., using APA format and uses at least 5 scholarly references, excluding the text.
BOOK INFO: https://bookshelf.textbooks.com/reader/books/9781119034377/pageid/90
USER NAME: [email protected]
PASSWORD: I WILL SEND IN A MESSAGE
Associated PLOs:
· PLO1: Demonstrate critical thinking skills and apply decision-making technology to evaluate information and to discover evidence-based solutions that are reliable.
· PLO2: Effectively communicate in all forms of expression to relate facts, simplify complexity, customize, and create persuasive arguments for the target audience to improve organizational function and/or to transform organizational vision for all stakeholders.
· PLO7: Demonstrate leadership excellence through abilities and behaviors, which include establishing a vision and inspiring and supporting others to work towards that shared vision and related goals.
· PLO11: Exercise professional behaviors consistent with self-awareness, accountability, continuous learning, and ethical and social responsibility for the greater good.
Associated Competencies:
· L1 Identify a problem, obstacle, or opportunity and act considering this identification to address current or future problems or opportunities. Initiative emphasizes proactively doing things and not simply thinking about future actions. Levels of proficiency relate to the time scale of focus, moving from addressing current situations to acting on long-term future opportunities or problems.
· L2: Assess Risks/Rewards of Potential Actions - Make decisions, set priorities, or choose goals based on calculated inputs and outputs (e.g., make explicit considerations of potential profit and risks or return on investment); calculate entrepreneurial opportunities in relation to risks, return on investment, and the scope and magnitude of the investments, and opportunity costs.
· HS1: Apply management theories, approaches, and core functions to routine operations and to current and emerging issues in the health care environment.
· HS4: Make specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance through evidence-based information and statistical metrics; pursue improvements to make systems work better, faster, at lower cost, more efficiently, and/or more reliably: utilize project management skills to advance initiatives within timelines while improving task and team performance for systems and people
· IE2: Translate the results of complex analyses into information that illustrates potential problems and opportunities in a persuasive, meaningful way.
· C1: Demonstrate formal and informal communication using traditional and contemporary modalities to convey messages that are clear and cogent for the target audience, which includes all forms of expression and technology that may be employed to reach the audience.
|
|
Excellent |
Developed |
Needs Improvement |
Significantly Underdeveloped |
Non-Performance |
|
Project Management Describe a work project or a simulated one and how it gets implemented using best practices. Discuss cross functional membership. Why were members chosen? What problems may be associated with the team members? How might the project help the professional goals of the people assigned? Do not use your experience as the basis or evidence for the paper, but what does the literature say? PLOs 1, 2, 7, 11; L1, L2, HS1, HS4, IE2, C1 |
Accurately describes a work project or a simulated one and how it gets implemented using best practices. Thoroughly discusses cross functional membership. Includes why members were chosen, what problems may be associated with the team members and how might the project help the professional goals of the people assigned. Does not use experience as the basis or evidence for the paper, but what relies on the literature.
|
Describes a work project or a simulated one and how it gets implemented using best practices. Discusses cross functional membership. Includes why members were chosen, what problems may be associated with the team members and how might the project help the professional goals of the people assigned. Does not use experience as the basis of the paper, but what relies on the literature. However, may miss a few key elements, or information lacks some scope, though the paper is developed.
|
Partially describes the work project. Minimally discusses membership and the elements of functional membership and goals of the membership. Reliance on the literature is weak and may be somewhat supported but is missing important best practices. |
Attempts to describe the project, but key elements are missing with a significantly underdeveloped text. Minimal reliance on the literature to establish best practices with personal experience used to generate context. Visual display tool may be absent. |
The description of the work project does not address the needed requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 Points |
15-14 Points |
14-12 Points |
12-7 Points |
7-1 Points |
0 Points |
|
Communication: Organization, Comprehension, and grammar The paper is easily understood with logical flow. It is well-organized Includes why you have chosen a certain path to get the project done. Sentence structure and grammar is without errors. PLO2; IE2, C1. |
The paper is easily understood with logical flow. It is well-organized Includes why a certain path to get the project done has been chosen. Sentence structure and grammar is without errors. |
Paper is easily understood with minor clarity issues and minimal grammar errors. It includes the reason a specific path to get the project done was chosen. |
Paper is readable but understandability is weak, and grammar is incorrect in several sentences. The path chosen for the project may be unclear. |
Most of the paper is unclear and without thoughtful organization. The path chosen for the project is unclear or not present. Grammar errors are throughout the paper. Paper coherence is substantially lacking. |
The coherence, organization and grammar does not address the needed requirements. |
|
5-4 Points |
4-3 Points |
3-2 Points |
2-1 Points |
0 Points |
|
|
Relevance: Consistent reference to visual tool that represents data, a timeline or activities. At least one tool (visual) is utilized, and it is referred to in the text but put in an Appendix of the paper. Label Appendix A, then B and so forth if you use more than one tool. PLO 1, 2; C1, HS4, IE2 |
The visual/tool is consistently referred to intext and aligns with the content intended reflecting on team assignments, workload, timeline, or project goals. The visual/tool is placed properly in an Appendix. |
The visual tool is used but highlights of the tool may be missing in the text. The tool is placed properly. |
The visual tool is placed in the body of the paper and not in the Appendix. The tool may be inadequately discussed. |
The visual tool is inappropriate and not developed in-text. It may be improperly placed. |
A visual tool is not included. |
|
5 Points |
5-4 Points |
4-3 Points |
3-2 Points |
2-1 Points |
0 Points |
|
Evidence-based: Paper uses at least five scholarly references and APA format throughout the text of the paper. The textbook does not count as one of the three references but may be used as a reference. PLO1; |
Paper uses at least five scholarly peer-reviewed references excluding the textbook with citations and a reference list using APA format. The textbook is not included in the five. |
Paper uses at least five scholarly references excluding the text but has minor errors in APA format. |
May not use the full five references and/or scholarly references are not used, but dot coms or dot orgs. |
Few scholarly references are used, and multiple citations are incorrect including the reference list format. Significant errors are noted, and references are not applicable. |
Scholarly reference use does not meet the assignment requirements. |
|
3 Points |
3-2.5 Points |
2.5-2 Points |
1-1.5 Points |
1.5-1 Points |
0 Points |
|
Format and scope: The paper is at least 5 to 7 pages long and includes headings in appropriate APA format excluding the ref. list and Appendix. Title pages and reference lists do not count for paper length. C1; |
Paper length is 5-7 pages excluding the ref list and Appendix. The headings are in APA format. |
Page length is 4 to 4 and 2/3 pages excluding ref list and Appendix. Format with APA headings are acceptable. |
Page length is less than 4.0 pages excluding ref list and Appendix. APA format has multiple errors. |
Page length is less than 3 pages excluding ref list and appendix. Significant non-compliance with APA headings requirements. |
Page length is unacceptable to meet the assignment’s requirements and does not meet the format requirements for the paper and Appendix. |
|
2 Points |
2-1.5 Points |
1.5-1 Points |
1-.5 Points |
.5 Points |
0 Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL=30 |
|
|
|
Page 1 | 1
