WEEK THREE Hospital Comparative Analysis Brief. 3-5 PAGES
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Criterion Score |
|
Content |
34 points 100% Complete comparison of two hospital/healthcare organizations identifying similarities and differences and identifying competitors. Discussion of financial and or strategic tools to be used to make long-term investments |
27.2 points 80% Partial comparison of two hospital/healthcare organizations identifying similarities and differences and identifying competitors. Discussion of financial and or strategic tools to be used to make long-term investments |
20.4 points Partial or no comparison of either hospital/healthcare organizations and/or no identification similarities and differences and identifying competitors. Discussion of financial and or strategic tools to be used to make long-term investments |
0 points No attempt at comparison of two hospital/healthcare organizations or identification similarities and differences and identifying competitors. Discussion of financial and or strategic tools to be used to make long-term investments |
Score of Content, / 34 |
|
Logic |
33 points Ideas are presented in a logical way, leading the reader to reasonable conclusions. |
26.400002 points Ideas are presented in a logical way that may not adequately lead the reader to reasonable conclusions. |
19.800001 points Ideas are either not logically presented or inadequately developed. |
0 points Ideas are neither logically presented nor adequately developed. |
Score of Logic, / 33 |
|
Grammar |
33 points Writing is almost completely free of technical and grammatical errors. APA style errors are minimal. |
26.400002 points Writing is relatively free of technical and grammatical errors. There may be several APA style errors. |
19.800001 points Mechanical and grammatical errors may obscure meaning. There may be significant APA style errors. |
0 points Significant mechanical, grammatical, and APA style errors interfere with meaning. |
|