case study1
Weekly DB Rubric
|
|
Outstanding 4 |
Proficient 3 |
Basic 2 |
Below Expectations 1 |
|
Critical Thinking |
•Rich in content •Full of thought, insight, and analysis |
•Substantial information •Thought, insight, and analysis has taken place |
•Generally competent •Information is thin and commonplace |
•Rudimentary and superficial •No analysis or insight is displayed |
|
Effective case conceptualization |
•Clear, holistic understanding of the client and challenges. |
•Understanding of case conceptualization but lacked specifics (vague) |
•Lack of clarity of case conceptualization and missed several key issues. |
•No understanding of case conceptualization. |
|
Treatment Plan |
Clearly articulated treatment plan. |
Treatment plan lacked specifics |
No clear treatment plan introduced. |
Lack of reasonable discussion of a treatment plan. |
|
Techniques |
Firm understanding of appropriate techniques and their implementation |
Listed techniques but lacked clear understanding of implementation. |
No clear description of techniques nor a reasonable comprehension of application |
Inappropriate techniques or no clear articulation of why or how techniques are chosen. |
|
APA/Grammar |
•Few grammatical or APA errors |
•Several grammatical or stylistic errors |
•Obvious grammatical or stylistic errors •Errors interfere with content |
•Obvious grammatical or stylistic errors •Makes understanding impossible |