Psychology Case Study Response Assignment

Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 20 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/52192/modules/items/1318364)

For this Assignment, you will continue your work on your Case Study Response Assignment in which you construct an assessment, complete a case conceptualization, create a treatment plan, and recommend interventions for the client in the case study.

To Prepare:

Review the video Crisis, Trauma, and Disaster Response: Sexual Trauma found in the Learning Resources for this week and consider how you might use this information to help you conceptualize the case study for this Assignment. Review the Case Study of Maria and Sofia Luna, provided in the Learning Resources and use this Case Study to complete this Assignment. Review and use the Case Conceptualization Template provided in the Learning Resources and use this template to complete this Assignment. Review the sample Case Conceptualization Form in the Learning Resources for an example of how this form is completed for a client.

CASE STUDY RESPONSE

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/52192/modules/items/1318393)

COUN_6336_Week9_Assignment1_Rubric

Assignment:

In the Case Conceptualization Template, complete the following:

Assessment Case Conceptualization Treatment Plan Interventions

Be sure to support your recommendations with specific references to the Learning Resources. Use proper APA format and citations.

Submit this Case Study Response Assignment.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

8 pts

8 pts

Responsiveness:By Day 7, submit your Case Study Response in which you construct an assessment, complete a case conceptualization, create a treatment plan, and recommend interventions for the client in the case study.

8 to >7.1 pts A (90.00% to 100.00%) Paper is responsive to and exceeds the requirements given in the instructions. It:... 1.) Responds to assigned or selected topic;... 2.) Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.)

7.1 to >6.3 pts B (80.00% to 89.9%) Paper is responsive to and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It:... 1.) Responds to the assigned or selected topic;... 2.) Addresses each point of the assignment.

6.3 to >2.7 pts C (70.00% to 79.9%) Paper is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It:... 1.) Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or... 2.) Addresses less than all of the points of the assignment but more than half.

2.7 to >0 pts F (0% to 69.9%)

Paper is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It:... 1.) Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or... 2.) Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or... 3.) Addresses less than half of the aspects of the assignment.

Content Knowledge:The extent to which the content in the paper or assignment demonstrates an understanding of the important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate.

8 to >7.1 pts A (90.00% to 100.00%) The paper demonstrates:... 1.) In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate

7.1 to >6.3 pts B (80.00% to 89.9%) The paper demonstrates:... 1.) Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course demonstrating that the student has absorbed the

6.3 to >2.7 pts C (70.00% to 79.9%) The paper demonstrates:... 1.) Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, displays some

2.7 to >0 pts F (0% to 69.9%)

The paper demonstrates:... 1.) Lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or

Criteria Ratings Pts

4 pts

and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to other ideas;... 2.) Rich and relevant examples;... 3.) Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives;... 4.) Original and critical thinking; and... 5.) Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.

general principles and ideas presented;... 2.) Relevant examples;... 3.) Thought- provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking; and... 4.) Critical thinking; and... 5.) Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.

omissions and/or errors; and/or... 2.) Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or... 3.) Few if any thought- provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or... 4.) “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking;... 5.) Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills or strategies presented in the course.

errors; and/or... 2.) No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or... 3.) No thought- provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or... 4.) No critical thinking; and/or... 5.) Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course.

Quality of Writing:The extent to which the student communicated in a way that meets graduate level writing or communication expectations.

4 to >3.5 pts A (90.00% to 100.00%)

Writing or communication exceeds graduate- level expectations. The paper:... 1.) Includes language that is clear, concise, and

3.5 to >3.1 pts B (80.00% to 89.9%)

Writing or communication meets graduate- level expectations. The paper:... 1.) Includes language that is

3.1 to >2.7 pts C (70.00% to 79.9%)

Writing or communication is somewhat below graduate-level expectations: The paper:... 1.) Includes language that is unclear

2.7 to >0 pts F (0% to 69.9%) Writing or communication is well below graduate-level expectations: The paper:... 1.) Includes unclear and inappropriate language; and/or...

Total Points: 20

Criteria Ratings Pts

appropriate;... 2.) Has few, if any, errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax;... 3.) Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader or listener;... 4.) Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate;... 5.) Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.

clear;... 2.) Has a few errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax;... 3.) Is well organized, logical, and clear;... 4.) Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate;... 5.) Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.

and/or inappropriate; and/or... 2.) Has more than occasional errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax; and/or... 3.) Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or... 4.) Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or... 5.) Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.

2.) Has many errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax; and/or... 3.) Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or... 4.) Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or... 5.) Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.