Week 8 Assignment

profilesalel.rgpl3
Week8Template.docx

2

Attachment Style: Personal Evaluation

STUDENT NAME

Walden University

Attachment Style: Personal Evaluation

Introduction goes here. No heading is needed for introductions. In this section, there should be a clear thesis statement, a few overview sentences about the topic, and a transition to the rest of the paper. Avoid making a series of “I will” statements. Instead, simply provide an overview of what lies ahead.

Attachment Category and Results Analysis

In this section, provide a summary of the results from the attachment survey (scores and categories) and what these revealed about your attachment style, including whether you agree or disagree with the findings. You should also include some insights as to what contributed to your scores (e.g., attachments in childhood, life experiences, etc). Remember to cite not only the survey itself, but also the assigned readings that support your discussion of the results.

Attachment and My Adult Development

In this section, provide a discussion of how your attachment patterns and style have shaped your adult relationships and your development as a whole. For example, consider how these influences have affected your intimate relationships, friendships, parenting – or other applications. Be sure to include any insights gained from this exercise, and to use resources to support your work.

Summary

This section should include a restated (paraphrased) thesis from the introduction, key points from the paper that support the thesis statement, and a concluding sentence.

References

This section should include any resources used in the paper. Remember that citations and references must match, though “References” includes primary resources only (see APA guide for how to cite secondary resources). The text should always be included, plus 2-3 additional assigned resources (or other applicable peer-reviewed sources). For this assignment, you should also be including the assigned survey as a reference. Please avoid using websites as primary resources (other than the assigned survey) as these are rarely peer-reviewed (unless they are online journal articles). Examples of websites to avoid are Wikipedia.com and About.com.