EXPOSURE DRAFT/RECENT STANDARD PRESENTATION ASSIGNMENT

Criteria Ratings Points

Discussion of Any Problem/Suggested Changes

25 to >22.0 pts

Advanced

Presentation meets all of the following criteria: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content

22 to >20.0 pts

Proficient

One of the following criteria is not met: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content

20 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Two or more of the following criteria are not met: • Clear and concise bullet points from the paper • Details in the notes sections • Summarizes content

0 pts

Not Present

25 pts

PowerPoint Content

115 to >105.0 pts

Advanced

All of the following are substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft

105 to >96.0 pts

Proficient

One or Two of the following are not substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft

96 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Three or more of the following are not substantively addressed: • Summarize the main points of the Current Exposure Draft • Compare/contrast with current theory/standards • Compare and contrast U.S. GAAP and IFRS in respect to the exposure draft topic • Research the need for the new standard/amendment (include pros and cons) • Evaluate the exposure draft’s provisions in light of the conceptual framework • Develop a logical, well-articulated response to the exposure draft

0 pts

Not Present

115 pts

Sources 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The submission utilizes at least 5 peer-reviewed articles, relevant to the content/topic.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The submission utilizes 3-4 peer-reviewed articles, relevant to the content/topic.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The submission includes 2 or fewer peer-reviewed articles relevant to the content/topic.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Exposure Draft/Recent Standard Presentation Grading Rubric | ACCT632_B01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

APA Format 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The presentation adheres to current APA format without errors or 1 minimal error including a title page, citations (parenthetical or in-text), and reference page.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The presentation uses APA format but has 2-3 errors including a title page, outline, citations (parenthetical or in-text), and reference page.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The presentation has 4 or more APA errors.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Structure and Length

40 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.

36 to >33.0 pts

Proficient

One of the following criteria is not met:. The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.

33 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Neither of the following criteria are met: The presentation includes at least 7 content slides and a reference slide.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Total Points: 200

Exposure Draft/Recent Standard Presentation Grading Rubric | ACCT632_B01_202140