Nursing assignment template

profiledadsfav96
WEEK8ASSGNMENTINSTRUCTIONS.docx
Home>Nursing homework help>Nursing assignment template

3

Regression

Focus

This week focuses on regression for statistical analysis. Use of regression in research is a quantitative approach used to examine the relationship between several variables.

Strengths and weaknesses of linear regression Linear regression is valued for its simplicity, interpretability, and ability to quantify relationships between variables while estimating the impact of predictors on an outcome. It is efficient, widely understood, and useful for prediction when assumptions are met. However, it relies on key assumptions (linearity, normality, homoscedasticity, and independence), is sensitive to outliers, and may perform poorly when relationships are nonlinear or when multicollinearity exists among predictors. Additionally, it does not imply causation and may be limited in handling complex real-world data.

Difference between logistic and multiple regression Multiple regression is used when the dependent variable is continuous and examines the relationship between one outcome and multiple independent variables. In contrast, logistic regression is used when the dependent variable is categorical (typically binary, such as yes/no or presence/absence) and estimates the probability of an outcome occurring. While multiple regression produces coefficients that reflect changes in the outcome variable, logistic regression produces odds ratios that describe the likelihood of the outcome given the predictors.

Objectives

· Explain how the prediction concept and regression could be a useful analytic tool in nursing 

· Differentiate between logistic and multiple regression 

· Analyze multiple and logistic output and a published study 

Deliverables

· Discussion ( Self-Study. Not Required): Correlation

       "  Post answers to the following:

· What is the relationship between a correlation matrix and multiple regression? How might they be used together? 

· What is the difference between logistic and multiple regression? 

· Assignment ( Required):  Critical Assessment

· Only select an article identified from the assignment source.

· DO NOT select a random article from the library DO NOT use the videos for this assignment

· Quiz ( Required):  Regression -  DUE 10:59pm CST on Day 7 of Week 8

· Carefully read requirements and guidelines.

Reminders!

· Thoroughly read the syllabus.

· Review learning resources.

· Review ALL grading rubrics to clearly identify expectations and requirements.

This is just a heads up for the week 8 assignment. Please note a snippet below of what is expected (see week 8 for full assignment information). Be sure to follow course guidelines AND review the rubric. You must select a research study article from the course resources and use the correct form. I highly recommend using an article from a peer reviewed journal. If you have any questions be sure to let me know.

"To prepare:

· Download the Critical Assessment, Appendix E2 Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool.

· Choose one published  quantitative study from any presented in resources in Weeks 1–7 and use Bissett et al. (2025) tools to critically appraise the research study (choose any  quantitative study used in the course).

The Assignment

Present your analysis using the critical appraisal tool and the individual evidence tool in Appendix E2. Blank forms are provided in a template for the submission."

It is important that you include the complete and correct  APA-formatted reference citation at the end of Appendix E2: Single Study Evidence Appraisal Toolfor your quantitative study assignment. This will allow easier retrieval and verification during the grading process.

WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT:

To prepare:

· Download the Critical Assessment, Appendix E2 Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool.

· Choose one published  quantitative study from any presented in resources in Weeks 1–7 and use Bissett et al. (2025) tools to critically appraise the research study (choose any  quantitative study used in the course).

The Assignment

Present your analysis using the critical appraisal tool and the individual evidence tool in Appendix E2. Blank forms are provided in a template for the submission.

REQUIRED RESOURCES FOR ASSIGNMENT!!!

· Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2025). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

· Chapter 12, “Correlation Coefficients and Regression: Can You Relate?” (pp. 219–240)

· Document:  Critical Assessment, Appendix E2: Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool (Word document) (If not able to click, template will be provided to bidder.)

· Alanazi, F. K., Lapkin, S., Molloy, L., & Sim, J. (2023).  The impact of safety culture, quality of care, missed care and nurse staffing on patient falls: A multisource association study Links to an external site. . Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(19/20), 7260–7272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16792

 

· Moradkhani, B., Mollazadeh, S., Niloofar, P., Bashiri, A., & Oghazian, M. B. (2021).  Association between medication adherence and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Links to an external site. . Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-021-00222-x

· Frazier, M. C. (2023).  Examining the lived experience of secondary traumatic stress in emergency room nurses: A mixed methods studyLinks to an external site. (Publication No. 30816304) [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Karamichos, S. (2023).  The professional identity of the nurse practitioner: A mixed methods studyLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. 30634134) [Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma City University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

· Medina, M. (2024).  Implementing motivational interviewing to improve medication adherence: A staff education project Links to an external site.  (Publication No. Order No. 30992260) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/15450

· Rampersad, M. (2023).  Oncology nurses, compassion fatigue and general health: A mixed-methods study Links to an external site. . Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11819

· Document:  Simons, A. (2023).  Executive summary: Quality improvement initiative reducing orthopedic surgical site infections through nasal decolonization  Download Executive summary: Quality improvement initiative reducing orthopedic surgical site infections through nasal decolonization. Walden University.

· Beydoun, A. S., Koss, K., Nielsen, T., Holcomb, A. J., Pichardo, P., Purdy, N., Zebolsky, A. L., Heaton, C. M., McMullen, C. P., Yesensky, J. A., Moore, M. G., Goyal, N., Kohan, J., Sajisevi, M., Tan, K., Petrisor, D., Wax, M. K., Kejner, A. E., Hassan, Z., … Zenga, J. (2022).  Perioperative topical antisepsis and surgical site infection in patients undergoing upper aerodigestive tract reconstruction Links to an external site. . JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 148(6), 547–554. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047735

· Sood, N., Lee, R. E., To, J. K., Cervellione, K. L., Smilios, M. D., Chun, H., & Ngai, I. M. (2022).  Decreased incidence of cesarean surgical site infection rate with hospital‐wide perioperative bundle Links to an external site. . Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 49(1), 141–146. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12586

· Sauer, K. (2023).  Testing for the treatment of urinary tract infections in symptomatic adult patients residing in long-term care facility: An evidence-based quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.  (Publication No. 30569808) [Doctoral dissertation, Phoenix University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/point-care-testing-treatment-urinary-tract/docview/2875242069/se-2?accountid=14872

RUBRIC:

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleted Appendix E2: Identified the quality of the article to answer the EBP question for one selected article.

35 to >28.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately identified the quality of the article to answer the EBP question of the selected article.

28 to >24.5 ptsGoodThe response accurately identified the quality of the article to answer the EBP question of the selected article.

24.5 to >21.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately identified the quality of the article to answer the EBP question of the selected article.

21 to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely or inaccurately identified the quality of the article to answer the EBP question of the selected article, or it is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleted Appendix E2: Completed all components of the form for the selected article.

100 to >80.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly completed all sections of the form. The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected.

80 to >60.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly completed all sections of the form. The response clearly analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected.

60 to >40.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected.

40 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately or vaguely completed all sections of the form, or it is missing. The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes the article and provides a clear review of the article selected, or it is missing.

100 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet are only briefly described.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 150