Essay for Myth2

profilesheilaaaa
Week8-Assimilationandcritiques.pdf

Thinking through assimilation…

 What is assimilation?

Some common questions…

 Should immigrants assimilate? Is assimilation good? Why?

Who does assimilation benefit (or not)?

 What does assimilation entail? (Change of values?

Language? Citizenship?)

 How quickly should immigrants assimilate?

 Are today’s immigrants assimilating as quickly as past

immigrants have?

 What impact do fast or slow rates of assimilation have on

the U.S.?

Some Definitions…

 Assimilation: The process through which minorities

accept the patterns and norms of the dominant

culture and cease to exist as separate groups

 Melting pot: A metaphor used to describe the

process of immigrant assimilation into U.S. dominant

culture

“Measuring” assimilation?

 How might we measure assimilation? How might we

measure the impact of assimilation?

 What would a research project aiming to measure

assimilation look like?

Now, work with a partner to:

1. Develop 2 research questions about assimilation

2. Identify a methodological strategy – how would you study this?

What data would you need access to?

3. How would you analyze this data, and how would it answer

your questions?

4. Were you able to fully answer your questions, or are you missing

something with your research strategy?

How have scholars measured

assimilation?

 The “demographic” approach (longer time = more assimilation)

 Measures:

 Generation

 Length of stay in U.S. for first-generation adults

 Socioeconomic status – “American middle class lifestyle”

 The “contextual” approach – differentiates the intensity with which immigrant children are “exposed” to American culture in the local context

 Measures

 Live with many other immigrants?

 Spatial concentration/ “immigrant enclaves”

 The “behavioral” approach

 Measures

 Non-English language use/English language learning

 friendship segregation and intermarriage

 Citizenship/naturalization rates

 First-generation immigrant: A person who left his or her

home country as an adult

 Second-generation immigrant: The child of immigrants

who is born and raised in the new host country

 1.5-generation immigrant: The child of immigrants who is born in the family’s home country but at a young age

moves with his or her parents to a new host country

 Dreamers, DACA recipients

Think about you and your family – what generation

immigrant are you?

When we try to measure

assimilation, what do we find?

For each chart…

 1 Comment – what does this chart show?

 1 Question – (ie. what else do you want to know?)

(Just lecture today to keep up!)

http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/iv-language-use-among-

latinos/ - feel free to use this for myth papers

https://publicpolicy.stanford.edu/news/what-history-tells-us-about-assimilation-immigrants

 Link to the larger report (addresses many elements

of Latino/Hispanic identity and public opinion):

 http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/when-

labels-dont-fit-hispanics-and-their-views-of-identity/

 You may use this for your papers.

“But they’re not like the old

European immigrants!”

German-American immigrants in 19th century Wisconsin…

 “In 1910, 24 percent of Hustisford residents reported being German monolingual, 35 percent of those American-born. Contrary to assumptions of economic marginality, in this region such monolinguals were not only housewives and farmhands but also craftsmen, tradesmen, teachers, and members of the clergy. Another stereotype is that monolinguals were geographically marginal, but they find them living interspersed with bilinguals and English monolinguals. Nor were they socially marginal, as church records point to a broadly German-dominant but overwhelmingly bilingual community, where numerous Anglo-Americans became highly proficient in German. Even schools were hardly the powerful tools of English learning they are often portrayed as being. Despite all this, Hustisford and similar communities presented themselves as hyperpatriotic Americans.”

 This included some third-generation German monolinguals.

 “while German Americans may have strongly identified with their imported culture and language, they also constructed and even embraced American identities… Early twentieth-century residents in Hustisford, we can conclude, enjoyed a time when it was possible to be both a German monolingual and a “good American.””

(Wilkerson and Salmons, 2012)

Left: German translation of “The Star-Spangled Banner” with flag imagery from Die Hausfrau, 1917. Below, patriotic language and imagery in contemporary immigrant protests

Those common questions…

 Should immigrants assimilate? Is assimilation good? Why?

Who does assimilation benefit (or not)?

 What does assimilation entail? (Change of values?

Language? Citizenship?)

 How quickly should/do immigrants assimilate?

 Are today’s immigrants assimilating as quickly as past

immigrants have?

 What impact do fast or slow rates of assimilation have on

the U.S.?

When we measure assimilation

 We find that most immigrants “assimilate”

(linguistically, at least) by the second generation,

regardless of place of origin

 We also find that there are many factors EXTERNAL

to an actual immigrant that impact the ability to

“assimilate” – ie. barriers to assimilation

 We also find that there are some problems with the

concept of assimilation…

And yet…

 New Jersey: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/teach er-people-fighting-speak-american-article-1.3566308

 New York: http://remezcla.com/culture/gringo- threatens-to-call-ice-speaking-spanish/

 Montana: http://remezcla.com/culture/border- patrol-us-citizen-spanish/

 Colorado: http://remezcla.com/culture/woman- standing-up-for-two-latinas-is-an-ally-colorado/

 The Superbowl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4BC8zUfNhU

Enduring questions

 Why do you think we have this idea that Hispanic/Latino

immigrants don’t learn English as fast as other groups?

 What makes language such a contentious, emotionally-

charged issue?

 Can immigrants who speak (only) Spanish, or another

language, be “Americans” (in terms of values and a sense

of belonging)? Can they be patriotic?

Critiquing assimilation theories

 What is Suarez-Orozco’s critique of the typical

assimilation story?

 Specifically, what are his critiques of the three

assumptions –

 “Clean break”

 “homogeneity”

 “progress”

 What is the alternative framework S-O suggests?

Segmented Assimilation

 Segmented assimilation theory: a theory which posits that new

immigrant populations (and their future generations) may have

divergent assimilation paths based on socio-economic status,

context of reception, and other factors.

 Based on the recognition that U.S. is an unequal, or stratified, society

 When immigrants arrive, only certain segments of U.S. society are

accessible to them (ie. where can they afford to live? What social

capital to they draw on to get established?)

 Used to predict what will happen to the children of immigrants

(second-generation)

 Immigrants may experience upward, downward, or straight-line

social/economic mobility

 Focus is on barriers to and opportunities for integration (socioeconomic

status, race/ethnicity, gender, etc.)

Segmented Assimilation and

immigrant “success” explained

 “immigrants who do well are often those who are able, due to certain advantages, to move into white middle-class neighborhoods.

 Another successful path is that of immigrants embedded in strong ethnic enclaves that have the human and economic capital to encourage education and mechanisms of incorporation into the broader U.S. society while simultaneously nurturing co-ethnic ties.

 Furthermore, these scholars argue, immigrants who settle in poor, native- born minority areas are more likely to experience downward mobility, as they assimilate into poverty, live in contexts of discrimination and racism, and adopt the… entrenched struggles that accompany these communities.

 Privilege spawns privilege, as wealthier migrants high in human capital come in with resources, tend to enjoy a positive context of reception, and integrate into more affluent enclaves…

 Poor and working class migrants, especially undocumented ones, are likely to arrive with low levels of human capital and to face a negative context of reception, which impacts their incorporation and limits their mobility.” (Menjívar et al, pp. 68-9; citing Portes and Zhou 1993)

Negative impacts?

“In summary, among Hispanics living in high-SES neighborhoods, we find some evidence that assimilation is positively associated with college enrollment, academic achievement, and self- esteem, and negatively associated with depression. There is also evidence that for these same adolescents assimilation is positively associated with delinquency, violence, use of controlled substance, and early sex initiation.”

(Xie and Greenman 2005, 28)

“Sociologist Rumbaut said his research has shown that the most disciplined, hardest-working and respectful students "tend to be the most recently arrived." They are the ones "who have not been here long enough to be Americanized into bad habits, into a Beavis and Butthead perspective of the world.“”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/meltingpot/meltingpot.htm

Assimilation rates of different generations --- production of tension in families

Alternatives to assimilation

 Multiculturalism: A pattern of ethnic relations in which new immigrants and their children enculturate into the dominant national culture and yet retain an ethnic culture

What do we have in the United States? Are we a melting pot, or a multicultural nation? How might we try to answer this question with social science research methods?

A pro-multiculturalism opinion based in theory of segmented assimilation: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/a-b-wilkinson/us- multiculturalism-or-cultural-assimilation_b_8218490.html

 https://www.migrationpolicy.org/topics/immigrant-integration

“a dynamic, two-way process in which immigrants and the receiving

society work together to build secure, vibrant, and cohesive

communities.” - https://weareoneamerica.org/what-we-do/issues-and-

organizing/immigrant-integration/

Also “immigrant incorporation”

**WCIA model**

Revisiting race in immigration

law

 How does the United States’ history of race-based immigration

law impact the current prospects for assimilation of today’s

immigrants and immigrant-descendant populations?

 (Who determines who is assimilated and who isn’t, what

measures are used, and where the bar is set?)

Next…

 Monday – Pia Orrenius, Dallas Federal Reserve

 Bring your questions on immigration and the economy!

 Merge into conversation about Week 8 readings and Week 9 readings - “Good” and “bad” immigrants, Immigration and the economy

 Media framing

 Deservingness narratives

 “criminalization”

 “economic drain”

 Some final changes to the syllabus coming up