week 8

11/7/22, 9:07 PMWeek 8 - Assignment: Recommend a Research Application - PSY-6510 v…tone in Forensic Psychology (0150104156) - Northcentral University

Page 1 of 3https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=256798&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=231215

Signature Assignment Rubric Course: PSY-6510 v3: Capstone in Forensic Psychology (0150104156)

Criteria Exceeds All Expectations (94%-100%)

Exceeds Most Expectations (90%-93%)

Meets Expectations (83%-89%)

Below Expectations (73%-82%)

Does Not Meet Expectations (0% - 72%)

Criterion Score

Introduce the topic

and population and

explain the need for

the presentation.

10%

/ 2

Identify your specific

audience and

demonstrate

alignment with the

topic. 10%

/ 2

Discuss evidence-

based approaches for

addressing the topic

or problem for the

population. 10%

/ 2

Address ethical,

cultural and diversity

needs and issues.

10%

/ 2

/ 2

2 points

The student clearly

identifies the topic of

the webinar. The

student provides an in-

depth overview of the

topic (and any sub-

themes) supported by

more than one research

citation. The student

clearly identifies the

need for the webinar

based on research

1.9 points

The student clearly

identifies the topic of

the webinar. The

student provides a

detailed overview of

the topic supported by

at least one research

citation. The student

clearly identifies the

need for the webinar.

1.8 points

The student clearly

identifies the topic of

the webinar. The

student provides a

basic overview of the

topic. The student

clearly identifies the

need for the webinar.

1.6 points

The student identifies

the topic of the

webinar, but provides

an insufficient

overview of the need

and its importance.

1.4 points

The student fails to

provide an overview of

the topic or to discuss

topic importance. The

student fails to identify

the need for the

webinar.

2 points

Student has a well-

developed training or

webinar directed at a

specific group with

clear focus and depth

appropriate for that

audience.

1.9 points

Student had a

presentation aimed at a

clear audience, chooses

research, topics, and

examples, which would

be applicable to that

audience.

1.8 points

Student had a clear

defined audience and

presents material

which would likely be

useful to that audience.

1.6 points

Student had some

focus in their

presentation and state

an audience, but the

presentation does not

appear focused for that

audience.

1.4 points

Student presentation

has little direction,

focus, or clear aim for a

particular audience.

2 points

The student identifies

six or more evidence-

based, best practice

approaches for

addressing/resolving

the topic/issue.

1.9 points

The student identifies

at least five evidence-

based, best practice

approaches for

addressing/resolving

the topic/issue.

1.8 points

The student identifies

at least four evidence-

based, best practice

approaches for

addressing/resolving

the topic/issue.

1.6 points

The student identifies

three or less evidence-

based, best practice

approaches for

addressing/resolving

the topic/issue.

1.4 points

The student fails to

identify any evidence-

based, best practice

approaches for

addressing/resolving

the topic/issue.

2 points

The student provides a

clear, comprehensive

explanation of multiple

ethical and multiple

cultural/diversity

needs/issues related to

their topic/issue and

their proposed

solutions. The student

clearly emphasizes the

role of ethics and

diversity/inclusion.

1.9 points

The student provides a

detailed explanation of

one or more ethical

and one or more

cultural/ diversity

needs/issues related to

their topic/issue.

1.8 points

The student provides a

basic explanation of an

ethical need/issue and

a cultural/diversity

need/issue related to

their topic/issue.

1.6 points

The student

incompletely addresses

ethical and

cultural/diversity need

or issue related to their

topic/issue.

1.4 points

The student fails to

address any ethical,

cultural, or diversity

needs or issues related

to their topic/issue.

2 points

Student evaluates

1.9 points

Student demonstrates

1.8 points

Student points to

1.6 points

Student draws limited

1.4 points

Conclusions drawn do

11/7/22, 9:07 PMWeek 8 - Assignment: Recommend a Research Application - PSY-6510 v…tone in Forensic Psychology (0150104156) - Northcentral University

Page 2 of 3https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=256798&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=231215

Presentation utilizes

research to lay the

foundation for

implications

presented. 10%

Address

collaborative efforts

needed and their

purpose. 10%

/ 2

The activities,

resources, and/or

handouts are

provided and are

appropriate in scope

and quality for the

target audience. 10%

/ 2

The visual

presentation includes

15-20 slides with

speaker notes which

are professional,

organized and

written in a clear and

compelling way.

10%

/ 2

The quality of the

student's oral

presentation via

audio clips or video

recording is

professional,

organized and well

executed. 10%

/ 2

research and presents

implications related to

their topic which

demonstrate critical

thinking and a deep

understanding of the

research.

a clear understanding

of the research and its’

implications by

providing appropriate

conclusions or

summaries.

conclusions based on

the research which are

basic but demonstrate

insight.

implications from the

research.

not appear to be based

on research or the

research that is

provided.

2 points

The student

completely, and clearly

describes collaborative

efforts needed along

with their purpose.

1.9 points

The student clearly

describes collaborative

efforts needed and

aligns this with their

purpose.

1.8 points

The student clearly

describes collaborative

efforts needed and

their purpose.

1.6 points

The student

incompletely describes

at least one

collaborative effort

needed. The purpose

may be unclear.

1.4 points

The student failed to

address the

collaborative efforts

needed to ensure

successful application

of their proposed

solutions.

2 points

The student identifies,

creates, and includes

resources and

interactive activities

suitable for the

audience in the

webinar. The resources

and activities are

shared throughout the

presentation to

enhance learning and

meet webinar

objectives.

1.9 points

The student identifies,

creates, and includes

more than 2 resources

or interactive activities

suitable for the

audience in the

webinar.

1.8 points

The student identifies,

creates, and includes at

least two basic

resources or activities

suitable for the

audience in the

webinar.

1.6 points

The student identifies

but fails to include

resources or activities

suitable for the

audience in their

webinar.

1.4 points

The student fails to

identify, create, or

include any resources,

handouts or activities

suitable for the

audience in their

webinar.

2 points

The visual presentation

was exceptionally

professional, organized

and well designed. 15-

20 slides were

thoughtfully composed

and were an impressive

part of the

presentation.

1.9 points

The visual presentation

was consistently

professional, well

organized and well

designed. Slides were

attractive. 15-20 slides

were engaging

1.8 points

The visual presentation

was satisfactorily

professional in nature,

well organized and well

designed. 15 – 20

slides were easy to

read.

1.6 points

The visual presentation

was poorly organized,

was less than

professional and/or

was poorly designed.

Slides were difficult to

read.

1.4 points

The visual presentation

was very low quality

(e.g., misspelled words,

not visually appealing)

and did not support the

student's presentation.

The length of the

PowerPoint was not

satisfactory.

2 points

The student's oral

presentation was

exceptional in terms of

the organization,

length, execution and

level of

professionalism. The

student's presentation

skills are far above

average.

1.9 points

The student's oral

presentation was

consistently

professional, well

organized and well

executed. The

student's presentation

skills are above

average. Oral

presentation was

appropriate for time-

1.8 points

The student's oral

presentation was

sufficiently

professional, organized

and well executed. It

was easy to understand

and follow the

presentation. Oral

presentation was

appropriate for time-

frame.

1.6 points

The student's oral

presentation was

poorly organized,

lacked professionalism

and/or there were

problems with the

delivery.

1.4 points

The student's oral

presentation was

unprofessional,

disorganized, or was

unintelligible.

11/7/22, 9:07 PMWeek 8 - Assignment: Recommend a Research Application - PSY-6510 v…tone in Forensic Psychology (0150104156) - Northcentral University

Page 3 of 3https://ncuone.ncu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=256798&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=231215

Total

Overall Score

Presentation based

on 15-20 scholarly

resources which are

properly cited using

APA style in slides

and in speaker notes.

10%

/ 2

frame.

2 points

Student has used

extensive scholarly

resources to develop

their presentation,

often considering

multiple sources before

formulating an opinion.

1.9 points

Student has used the

required number of

scholarly resources or

more to adequately

answer their research

question.

1.8 points

Student used 15 - 20

scholarly resources and

does not base any

opinions on unscholarly

material.

1.6 points

Student used some

scholarly references

but also used

unscholarly resources

or no resources to back

up ideas.

1.4 points

Student has used little

to no scholarly

resources to base their

opinions.

Exceeds All Expectations 18.8 points minimum

Exceeds Most Expectations 18 points minimum

Meets Expectations 16.6 points minimum

Below Expectations 14.6 points minimum

Does Not Meet Expectations 0 points minimum