Pharmacology

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 1/6

Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/modules/items/1752243)

(https://cdn-

media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920x938/GettyLicense_932736896.jpg) Submit your Assignment, started in Week 6.

DECISION TREE FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND MUSCULOSKELETAL

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/modules/items/1752257)

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 2/6

NURS_6521_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center offers an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm (http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm) ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 3/6

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

25 pts

Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific.

20 to >17.8 pts Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.

17.8 to >15.8 pts Good

The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.

13.8 to >0 pts Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing.

Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

25 to >22.25 pts Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. ... The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.

22.25 to >19.75 pts Good

The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature. ... The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.

19.75 to >17.25 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature. ... The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.

17.25 to >0 pts Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence- based literature, or is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 4/6

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

20 pts

What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

20 to >17.8 pts Excellent

The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. ... The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.

17.8 to >15.8 pts Good

The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. ... The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. ... The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.

13.8 to >0 pts Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.

Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.8 pts Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. ... The response provides specific, accurate, and

17.8 to >15.8 pts Good

The response accurately explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. ... The response provides accurate examples that support whether there were differences

15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. ... The response provides inaccurate or vague examples that may or may not support

13.8 to >0 pts Poor

vaguely explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise, or is missing. ... The response provides inaccurate and

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 5/6

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

5 pts

relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.

between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.

whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.

vague examples that do not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good Contains a few (1– 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

7/18/23, 6:49 PM Week 8: Assignment

https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/65879/assignments/559052 6/6

Total Points: 100

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts Good

Contains a few (1– 2) APA format errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts Fair

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3.45 to >0 pts Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors