for Miss Lynn

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 1

Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in two to three sentences, using proper grammar.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 2

Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 3

Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 4

Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 5

Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 6

How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 7

Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.

Week 7 Short Responses – Question 8

Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.

Guidelines for Submission: Your response to Question 1 should be no more than one sentence in length. Your responses to Questions 2, 6, 7, and 8 should be 2–

3 sentences in length. Your responses to Questions 3, 4, and 5 should be 1–2 sentences in length.