week 7 replies

2

100 words each reply

D1 reply to doug

Today’s synthetic opioids like fentanyl and semi-synthetic drugs like heroin are highly dangerous due to their potency.  Even a very small amount is enough to kill a person.  This and the ease by which it can be obtained, (purposely and by accident) are the main factors that make these drugs the dominant force in fatal drug overdoses in the U.S.  Easy to use and powerfully fatal.  Fentanyl is the most powerful and unpredictable because as, “Little as 2 mg of fentanyl, the amount of a few grains of salt, can be fatal”. (NIDA 2025).  Drug pushers across the country “lace” or create counterfeit medications with fentanyl, and people buy them from these street dealers with no prescription. Because the amount of this drug is not regulated properly, people die of overdoses.  Sometimes sold on the internet, “These fake pills may look exactly like the real thing but can also contain fentanyl, often in deadly doses”.  (NIDA 2025).  The NIDA suggests that these folks often do not realize the medicines they thought were legitimate were mixed with fentanyl.  They go on to relate cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and even veterinary tranquilizer is used.  Fentanyl traffickers continue to experiment with synthetic opioids to circumvent new regulations imposed by the United States and China (DEA, 2019).

These few but important facts make this drug a nightmare for Criminal Justice Agencies to track and prosecute.  The online distributors are especially slippery.  “Fatal overdose deaths attributed to heroin remain at epidemic levels due to availability.  Fentanyl is increasingly available and being sold as white powder heroin”. (Lacher 2021). Because a large amount of these drugs are cultivated and manufactured right here in our backyard, (Mexico) they are easily transported by the Cartels and other TCO’s across our porous Southern border.  The impact of these drugs have forced LE agencies to shift from traditional interdiction tactics to full on frontal assault.  With the ever growing power and influence of the Cartels, it seems our traditional forms of policing are being strained to their limits.  These Cartels have enough money to buy military grade armor and weapons and even drones, forcing our police to up armor and adopt military tactics to even make a dent.  Crime labs and forensics departments are seeing a back log of cases due to the volume of these powerful drugs, thus slowing down prosecutions.  

~Doug

Lacher, D. (2021). Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice Management (2nd ed.). Cognella, Inc..  https://ccis.vitalsource.com/books/811292A 

Online Fact Sheet (2025). Center Disease Control: Fentanyl Fact Sheet.  https://www.cdc.gov/overdose-resources/pdf/CDC_Fentanyl-Fact-Sheet_General_508.pdf 

NIDA Online Article (2025). National Institute on Drug Abuse: Fentanyl.  https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/fentanyl#dangerous 

NIDA Online Article (2025). National Institute on Drugs: Over 115 million pills containing illicit fentanyl seized by law enforcement in 2023.  https://nida.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/2024/05/over-115-million-pills-containing-illicit-fentanyl-seized-by-law-enforcement-in-2023 

D1 reply chet

Synthetic opioids now cause the most overdose deaths in the United States due to their high potency relative to street drugs like heroin and prescription opioids; low production costs; and compact size and design, making them easy to transport and hide. Traffickers can move much higher volumes of doses, increasing profit margins. Cutting agents: Drugs traffickers often lace illicit opioids with fentanyl to boost potency or bulk up product, but users may not know when this is the case. This practice drastically increases risk of overdose because even a small amount of fentanyl can be deadly. Market changes: Production of illicit opioids can happen anywhere with access to precursor chemicals, and drug manufacturers no longer need to source pharmaceutical-grade ingredients through licit channels. Dealers can synthetically produce drugs at a cheaper cost and flood communities quicker. Less experienced users: A person's opioid tolerance can diminish if they are in recovery or switch to non-opioid drugs. Overdose is likely if that person relapses or uses synthetic opioids without knowledge of potency. Drug testers: Some synthetic opioids cannot be tested with standard drug screening panels or may take longer to identify. As a result, drug users may not know they are using synthetics and continue to use drugs at the same rate despite heightened risk of overdose.

 

Fentanyl’s proliferation into illicit drug markets has impacted nearly every component of the criminal justice system. First responders and law enforcement respond to overdoses, requiring additional safety training and equipment when handling evidence. Medical examiners and crime labs receive more overdose cases while needing to test for more drugs. Prosecutors and judges face challenges with constantly evolving drug evidence, changing trafficking patterns, and charging and sentencing decisions for defendants convicted of distributing synthetic opioids. Corrections departments have concerns about overdose deaths while incarcerated and people accessing drugs upon release. Together, this mounting crisis has expanded partnerships between law enforcement, public health, and community organizations; implemented harm-reduction strategies like drug checking services and widespread naloxone distribution; and sparked interest in expanding treatment and alternatives to incarceration.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Fentanyl. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/opioids/fentanyl.html

 

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2024). Fentanyl drug facts. National Institutes of Health. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/fentanyl

less

d2 reply to melecia

What barriers exist between those of the Muslim faith and law enforcement?

 Muslims face stereotypical backlash by existing in the United States post 9/11. The residual stigma related to the terroristic acts, where heavily associated with radical groups, often identified as extremist of the Muslim faith. The narrative became synonymous with all members of the Muslim faith, along with people who practice the Muslim religion (Lacher, 2021). Those individuals who were refugeed or previously living in the United States, as practicing Muslims, are profiled and categorized as a national threat (Lacher, 2021). As a result, many live in fear of potential law enforcement interactions being handled under the guise of implicit bias, related to this stigma. “From 2006 to 2015 in the United States, terrorist attacks by those who identify as Muslim received 357% more media attention than terrorist attacks by other groups despite only accounting for 12.5% of all terrorist attacks in America. Following the September 11 attacks, multiple government programs and initiatives were created with the intent to keep all citizens safe. However, they have at times been used to target and discriminate against innocent Muslims” (Neptune, 2025).

The media propagated the blanket narrative without distinction, for years to garner support for the “war on terror” and retribution for those who fell victim to the events on 9/11. It was insinuated that sympathizers/ affiliates with the Muslim religion were potential sleeper cell members, lying in wait, to perform more acts of terror (Patel, 2021).

 The presumption of guilt, by propagated bias, is not a new theme in the United States. Many of the practicing Muslim population in this country are also identified as minority, brown people, and immigrants. There were historical atrocities committed towards social, ethnic and cultural demographics, being perceived as criminals, without merit. The United States in general and law enforcement specifically, has a profound and derogatory and disproportionate history of maltreatment towards those classified as minority. “Such racist—not “racial”—violence committed by whites against Blacks includes centuries of the actions of slave patrollers, the abuse and murder of enslaved people, lynching, the firebombing of homes and businesses, murderous pogroms, torture, police violence, hate strikes, and more. Such violence may have gone unchecked by state authorities—if not actively carried out under their name and behind their badge” (Lichtenstein &Moyd, 2026). Muslims are aware of the issue and are distrusting of law enforcement because of it.

The events of 9/11 triggered a recycled permission to act on bias suspicions based on religious affiliation, skin color, geographical origins and cultural distinctions of yet another brown population. Absence of evidence, this practice alone is unethical, and it is the basis of the barrier between law enforcement and members of the Muslim faith. “Several changes in law and policy after 9/11 have facilitated profiling on the basis of constitutionally protected characteristics. The attorney general’s guidelines for FBI investigations, for instance, were dramatically loosened in 2002 and again in 2008. Previously, the guidelines required agents to focus on suspicion of criminal activity. Now, however, agents can launch non-predicated investigations — i.e., absent any facts indicating wrongdoing on the part of the investigation’s target — so long as the purpose is to protect against criminal or national security threats or to collect foreign intelligence” (Patel, 2021).

Utilizing the dual-front concept, how could law enforcement overcome those barriers?

The first step towards overcoming the barrier and utilizing the dual front requires burning the candle at both ends and playing offense and defense to attack the problem from both sides. Law enforcement has to take responsibility for bias patterned behavior and eliminate the practice. Retrain the officers to recognize that distinctions based on religious affiliation are not an automatic qualifier for criminal behavior Lacher, 2021). The United States is always categorized as melting pot of culture. Becoming educated in the variety of people within the community; they serve through engagement while also creating opportunities to gather information lawfully. Replacing the unfounded preconceived stigma with factual knowledge.

 However, if this idea is seen as a way to disarm and infiltrate the community, using the trusted relationships to gather intelligence by means of cooperation, that concept is a combination of drawing bees with honey and planting a Trojan horse and can appear as a disingenuous counter measure. Intent is important, in order for the duel front approach to be received as measures towards justice and equality. Most importantly, it is necessary to acknowledge that the dual front approach is a path to Muslims and law enforcement being unified and sharing the common goal to build authentic relationships and remove bias from the equation of policing. Replacing unethical profiling with constitutionally sound ethical and legal means to conduct police efforts (Lacher, 2021).

References

Lacher, D. (2021). Contemporary issues in criminal justice management (2nd ed.). Cognella. 2026,  https://ccis.vitalsource.com/reader/books/811292A/pageid/0

Lichtenstein, A., & Moyd, M. (2026). History of racist violence | The American Historical Review | oxford academic. Oxford Academic.  https://academic.oup.com/ahr/pages/history-of-racist-violence

Neptune, S. (2025). Discrimination against Muslims in the United States. Ballard Brief.  https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/discrimination-against-muslims-in-the-united-states

Patel, F. (2021). Ending the “national security” excuse for racial and religious profiling. Brennan Center for Justice.  https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/ending-national-security-excuse-racial-and-religious-profiling

 

D2 reply to eric

Long-standing distrust, claims of profiling, cultural misunderstandings, and communication problems contribute to tensions between American Muslim communities and law enforcement. Many Muslim Americans reported feeling watched or targeted more than others in the fight against terrorism after 9/11, which made them less likely to trust police departments. Lacher (2021) notes that when people in a community perceive unfair treatment, it can make it much harder for them to work together and share knowledge. People may also be less willing to work with authorities if they don't speak English well, have religious convictions, or fear what will happen if they move to a new country.

Another major challenge is that some police officers don't know much about foreign cultures and have biases they aren't aware of. Research shows that when people in a community believe the police aren't culturally aware or sensitive, they lose faith in them and are less likely to report crimes (Tyler, 2006). The media and geopolitical events can also create stereotypes that make it harder for police and communities to get along. These problems can slow the flow of information, make it difficult for police to cooperate with the community, and increase the likelihood of misunderstandings in everyday settings.

The dual-front method is a strong approach to these issues because it emphasizes the need for both community involvement and internal transformation. Agencies need to invest in training on cultural competency, bias awareness, and procedural justice to ensure that officers treat Muslim community members with respect and fairness. Police should work regularly with mosque leaders, community groups, and youth groups. Regular debate forums, collaborative problem-solving, and open lines of communication can help restore legitimacy and trust between parties.

When applied effectively, the dual-front strategy makes operations more successful and helps the community trust each other more. Police departments can make the public safer by reducing fear, increasing voluntary cooperation, and improving public safety outcomes. Ultimately, it bridges the gap, instilling trust, fairness, cultural understanding, and collaborative understanding.

References

Lacher, D. (2021). Contemporary issues in criminal justice management (2nd ed.). Cognella, Inc.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

Weine, S., & Ahmed, O. (2012). Building resilience to violent extremism among Somali-Americans in Minneapolis–St. Paul. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START).