final

profileAA6666
Week7InternationalAdoptionsfromChina_W22.pptx

Week 7

International Adoptions from China

Internal Weather Report

Pre-Class Learning Activities

Read: Johnson, K. A. (2009). Adoption. In D. Pong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of modern China (Vol 1, pp 3-8). (in Files)

Read: Johnson, K. A. (2004). Chapter Four: Infant abandonment and adoption in China, 1996-2000. (pp. 75-134). *Separated into 3 files

Engage with Chinese adoptee voices: Read: “Precious Jade” by Jenna Cook, Chinese adoptee(files)

Historical background on Chinese Adoption

Western discourse of Chinese adoption erroneously presumes no tradition of adoption in China due to:

A) influence of Confucianism on Chinese culture and its emphasis on patrilineal biological ties

B) Normative Chinese texts argue against adoption

C) Traditional Chinese law prohibited adoption outside patrilineal surname lines

In reality: Adoption documented as quite common for hundreds of years

Strains of Confucianism as well as pop culture support adoptive ties outside as well as inside blood lines—of both boys and girls—to build family and kinship

Earlier in history: Law Versus popular practice

Dates back to 18th century, late imperial times and earlier--Practices varied by region, class ethnicity

Only legal legitimated purpose was to obtain a male heir for the patrilineal family

Supposed to be obtained from close male relatives, ideally, if not exclusively from a brother

BUT in popular practice …. Many purposes:

1. Obtain a “little daughter in law,” adoption of future bride for son

2. Adopt girl believing this would overcome infertility and lead to birth of son

3. Sonless couples might adopt daughter’s husband to provide a male heir (thus, could involve an adult)

4. Provide homes for orphans (parents dead) or foundlings (abandoned children)

Contemporary China & Adoption Impact of the One child Policy

Adoption of little daughters-in-law virtually disappeared

Most common, adopting girls as daughters, nonrelative adoption more common than adoption from relatives

Adoption increased in 1980’s and 1990’s

Vast majority not registered

Most girls

Direct result of high-pressure birth-planning campaigns beginning with start of one-child policy in 1979

1 child birth limit, largely successful in urban areas by early 1980’s; rural resistance, government loosened limit to 2 children in countryside if first birth was a girl

Impacts of the one child policy (cont)

Adoption used to hide and keep second and third daughters and try again for son

Birth planning officials closed loophole of using adoption to have more children  new birth planning regulations forbade adoption except by childless couples over thirty-five

Birth parents who hid a child by adopting the child out would not be allowed an additional birth if caught

Adoptive parents who had another child or were too young subjected to stiff birth-planning penalties

In 1991 these birth planning regulations became the nation’s first adoption law

Waves of female-infant abandonment

Strict, often coercive birth planning campaigns

+

highly restrictive one-child adoption regulations

= waves of female infant abandonment

Spontaneous adoption continued of these foundlings

Most in violation of the law and so unregistered

Numbers of abandoned children reaching orphanages unprecedented, orphanages overcrowded, underfunded, shortage of medical care and staffing

International Adoption

Introduction of International Adoption

Having already severely restricted the pool of legally qualified domestic adoptees to bolster population-control policies, government turned to international adoption, limited entirely to children in orphanages

Goals: 1) limit overcrowding; 2) provide source of funding for orphanage upkeep, medical supplies, staffing

Peaked mid 2000s

Improved conditions of orphanages

But further financially incentivized orphanage directors to favor international over domestic adoption

In 2000 government slightly eased restrictions on domestic adoption but financial bias toward international adoption, domestic adoption remained difficult

Decreasing international adoption, increasing domestic adoption

Dearth of healthy babies began to fall after 2000 due to decreased abandonment in the context of increasing wealth, lowered fertility rates (also correlated with wealth) and increased domestic adoption

Much of domestic adoption happens before abandoned children reach the orphanage and remains unregistered

Scandals of baby trafficking & forcible removal of over quota children emerge

Orphanage composition changing at this time to children with moderate to severe special needs

Enactment of Hague Convention governing international adoption

Mandates domestic adoption should always take precedence over international adoption

Since its start in 1991, China’s international adoption program has violated this principle

China’s international program born of coercive government population-control policies that both stocked child abandonment but also intentionally restricted domestic adoption

China signed Hague Agreement in 2005

Today adoptions from China primarily special needs adoptions

Go Frolic

See You Next Week!