Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Patient Case Presentation
Catherine2
WEEK7GRADEDRUBRIC....htmlRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
https%3A%2F%2Fclass.waldenu.edu%2Fwebapps%2Frubric%2FWEB-INF%2Fjsp%2Fcourse%2FrubricGradingPopup.jsp%3Fmode%3Dgrid%26isPopup%3Dtrue%26rubricCount%3D1%26prefix%3D_24499271_1%26course_id%3D_16878913_1%26maxValue%3D100.0%26rubricId%3D_2612274_1%26viewOnly%3Dtrue%26displayGrades%3Dtrue%26type%3Dgrading%26rubricAssoId%3D_3419853_1Name: PRAC_6635_Week7_Assignment2_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photo ID display and professional attire | Points: 5 (5.00%) Points Range: 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. Feedback: |
| Time | Points: Points Range: 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) Feedback: |
| Description of chief complaint and history of present illness | Points: Points Range: 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: 3 (3.00%) Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. Feedback: |
| Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history | Points: Points Range: 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback: | Points: 4 (4.00%) Points Range: 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. Feedback: |
| Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems | Points: Points Range: 14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: 11 (11.00%) Points Range: 11 (11.00%) - 11 (11.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback: |
| Discussion of diagnostics with results | Points: Points Range: 9 (9.00%) - 10 (10.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: 8 (8.00%) Points Range: 8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%) The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7 (7.00%) - 7 (7.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 6 (6.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback: |
| Diagnosis with three (3) differentials | Points: Points Range: 23 (23.00%) - 25 (25.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback: | Points: 22 (22.00%) Points Range: 20 (20.00%) - 22 (22.00%) The student provides an accurate diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18.00%) - 19 (19.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3 or incomplete diagnosis with differentials. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 17 (17.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Less than 2 diagnosis. Feedback: |
| Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation | Points: Points Range: 23 (23.00%) - 25 (25.00%) The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: | Points: 22 (22.00%) Points Range: 20 (20.00%) - 22 (22.00%) The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18.00%) - 19 (19.00%) The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 17 (17.00%) The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback: |
| Presentation style | Points: 5 (5.00%) Points Range: 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3 (3.00%) - 3 (3.00%) Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 2 (2.00%) Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. Feedback: |
Photo ID display and professional attire--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) Photo ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally. Good 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Fair 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Poor 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Photo ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally. Feedback:Time--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit. Good 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Fair 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Poor 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) The video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.) Feedback:Description of chief complaint and history of present illness--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The student provides an accurate description of the chief complaint and history of present illness. Fair 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of the chief complaint and history of present illness, or description is missing. Feedback:Description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The student provides an accurate description of past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history. Fair 0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%) Poor 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete description of psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, and family history, or description is missing. Feedback:Discussion of most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Good 12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) The student provides an accurate discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Fair 11 (11.00%) - 11 (11.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of results from most recent mental status exam and observations made during interview and review of systems. Poor 0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:Discussion of diagnostics with results--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (9.00%) - 10 (10.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete discussion of diagnostics with results. Good 8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%) The student provides an accurate discussion of diagnostics with results. Fair 7 (7.00%) - 7 (7.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete discussion of diagnostics with results. Poor 0 (0.00%) - 6 (6.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Feedback:Diagnosis with three (3) differentials--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23.00%) - 25 (25.00%) The student provides an accurate, clear, and complete diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Good 20 (20.00%) - 22 (22.00%) The student provides an accurate diagnosis with three (3) differentials. Fair 18 (18.00%) - 19 (19.00%) The student provides a vague, inaccurate, less than 3 or incomplete diagnosis with differentials. Poor 0 (0.00%) - 17 (17.00%) All or most of the discussion is inaccurate or missing. Less than 2 diagnosis. Feedback:Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23.00%) - 25 (25.00%) The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Good 20 (20.00%) - 22 (22.00%) The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Fair 18 (18.00%) - 19 (19.00%) The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. Poor 0 (0.00%) - 17 (17.00%) The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Feedback:Presentation style--
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%) Presentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused. Good 4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%) Presentation style is clear, professional, and focused. Fair 3 (3.00%) - 3 (3.00%) Presentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused Poor 0 (0.00%) - 2 (2.00%) Presentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused. Feedback: Raw Total: 80.00 (of 100)Feedback to Learner
please see feedback in your paper.
Name:PRAC_6635_Week7_Assignment2_Rubric
Support
