QSO 420 ( week 7)
malshaghathirah
week7feedback.pdf
QSO‐420 Final Project Rubric (SA) Activity: 7‐2 Final Project Submission: Presentation
Course: QSO‐420‐H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5
Name: Mohammed Alshaghathirah
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Parameters:
Elements
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Defined the basic elements of EV
Parameters:
Analysis
0 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Did not explain where the data is coming from. This was a milestone one issue.
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and uses
industry‐specific
language to
establish expertise
5.95 points
Accurately defines
basic elements
used to calculate
EVM measures and
identifies their
location within
project
documentation
3.85 points
Defines basic
elements used to
calculate EVM
measures, but does
not identify their
location within
project
documentation, or
definition lacks
accuracy
0 points
Does not define
basic elements
used to calculate
EVM measures
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
examples provide
evidence of well‐
informed, keen
insight into EVM
principles
5.95 points
Comprehensively
analyzes project
documentation for
data necessary to
establish EVM
parameters and
justifies rationale
with examples
3.85 points
Analyzes project
documentation for
data necessary to
establish EVM
parameters, but
with gaps in detail,
or does not justify
rationale with
examples
0 points
Does not analyze
project
documentation for
data necessary to
establish EVM
parameters
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
1 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Parameters:
Earned Value
3.85 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Identified percent complete and weighted milestone methods, but the others are not methods
Parameters:
Selection
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Selected the percent complete method
Calculations:
EVM Measures
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and uses
industry‐specific
language to
establish expertise
5.95 points
Comprehensively
discusses methods
used to determine
earned value
3.85 points
Discusses methods
used to determine
earned value, but
with gaps in detail
0 points
Does not discuss
methods used to
determine earned
value
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
provides
explanation of why
other methods are
inappropriate for
project in case
study
5.95 points
Selects appropriate
method for
determining earned
value for project in
case study and
substantiates
position with
research
3.85 points
Selects method for
determining earned
value for project in
case study, but
method is not
appropriate, or
does not
substantiate
position with
research
0 points
Does not select
method for
determining earned
value for project in
case study
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
articulation is
exceptionally clear
and logical
5.95 points
Accurately
demonstrates how
elements are used
to calculate EVM
measures
3.85 points
Demonstrates how
elements are used
to calculate EVM
measures, but with
gaps in accuracy
0 points
Does not
demonstrate how
elements are used
to calculate EVM
measures
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
2 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Explained the EV measures
Calculations:
Equations
0 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Did not complete all calculations
Calculations:
Implications
7 / 7
7 points
N/A
This level is not
applicable for
grading of this
criterion.
7 points
Accurately employs
EVM equations to
calculate EVM
measures for
project in case
study
3.85 points
Employs EVM
equations to
calculate EVM
measures, but with
gaps in accuracy
0 points
Does not employ
EVM equations to
calculate EVM
measures
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
articulation is
exceptionally clear
and logical
5.95 points
Accurately explains
implications for
project per
specifications
3.85 points
Explains
implications for
project but with
gaps in accuracy or
detail
0 points
Does not explain
implications for
project
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
3 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Criterion Feedback
Explained implications of CPI/SPI
Interpretation:
Use of EVM
Statistics
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Explained how statistics are used to identify deficiencies
Interpretation:
Deficiencies
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Identified deficiencies with the case
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
provides cogent
examples to detail
the process of
using EVM to
identify
deficiencies
5.95 points
Comprehensively
explains how EVM
statistics are used
to identify potential
project deficiencies
3.85 points
Explains how EVM
statistics are used
to identify potential
project deficiencies,
but with gaps in
detail
0 points
Does not explain
how EVM statistics
are used to identify
potential project
deficiencies
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and cites
specific, relevant
examples to
establish a robust
context for the
interpretation
5.95 points
Accurately
interprets EVM
statistics for the
project in the case
study for
deficiencies and
supports reasoning
with research
3.85 points
Interprets EVM
statistics for the
project in the case
study for
deficiencies, but
with gaps in
accuracy, or does
not support
reasoning with
research
0 points
Does not interpret
EVM statistics for
the project in the
case study for
deficiencies
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
4 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Interpretation:
Role of EVM
Principles
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Described the role of EVM principles
Interpretation:
Integrated
Control
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Discussed how integrated control was used
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and cites
specific, relevant
examples to
establish a robust
context for the
discussion
5.95 points
Comprehensively
discusses the role
of EVM principles
in achieving
integrated cost and
schedule control
and substantiates
claims with
research
3.85 points
Discusses the role
of EVM principles
in achieving
integrated cost and
schedule control,
but with gaps in
detail, or does not
substantiate claims
with research
0 points
Does not discuss
the role of EVM
principles in
achieving
integrated cost and
schedule control
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
articulation is
exceptionally clear
and logical
5.95 points
Accurately
interprets EVM
statistics for the
project in the case
study for the
successful
integration of cost
and schedule
control and justifies
position with
research
3.85 points
Interprets EVM
statistics for the
project in the case
study for the
successful
integration of cost
and schedule
control, but with
gaps in accuracy, or
does not justify
position with
research
0 points
Does not interpret
EVM statistics for
the project in the
case study for the
successful
integration of cost
and schedule
control
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
5 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Interpretation:
Recommendation
s for Improving
3.85 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Provided generic recommendations but not aligned with the case
Application:
Integrated Cost
and Schedule
Control
7 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Assessed the use of integrated control
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
provides detailed
examples of how
the
recommendations
will support the
improvement of
integrated cost and
schedule control
5.95 points
Makes appropriate
recommendations
for improving
integrated cost and
schedule control for
the project in the
case study and
justifies
recommendations
with research
3.85 points
Makes
recommendations
for improving
integrated cost and
schedule control,
but
recommendations
are not
appropriate, or
does not justify
recommendations
with research
0 points
Does not make
recommendations
for improving
integrated cost and
schedule control
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
assessment is
exceptionally well
informed and
integrates relevant
theories and
research
5.95 points
Accurately assesses
the role of
integrated cost and
schedule control in
improving overall
project
performance and
substantiates
reasoning with
research
3.85 points
Assesses the role of
integrated cost and
schedule control in
improving overall
project
performance, but
with gaps in
accuracy, or does
not substantiate
reasoning with
research
0 points
Does not assess the
role of integrated
cost and schedule
control in
improving overall
project
performance
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
6 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Total 72.7 / 100
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Application:
Project
Performance
0 / 7
Criterion Feedback
Provided definitions of the measures but did not analyze performance of the case study
Articulation of
Response
2 / 2
Criterion Feedback
No errors noted
7 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and
articulation is
exceptionally clear
and logical
5.95 points
Comprehensively
analyzes
performance of the
project in the case
study based on
interpretation of
EVM statistics and
with regard to
integrated cost and
schedule control
3.85 points
Analyzes
performance of the
project in the case
study based on
interpretation of
EVM statistics and
with regard to
integrated cost and
schedule control,
but with gaps in
detail
0 points
Does not analyze
performance of the
project in the case
study
2 points
Submission is free
of errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax,
and organization
and is presented in
a professional and
easy‐to‐read
format
1.7 points
Submission has no
major errors related
to citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or
organization
1.1 points
Submission has
major errors related
to citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas
0 points
Submission has
critical errors
related to citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or
organization that
prevent
understanding of
ideas
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
7 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
Overall Score
Exemplary Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Proficient Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Needs Improvement Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Not Evident Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...
8 of 8 6/21/2023, 11:34 AM
