STAFFING MODELS PPTX.

Select an appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

Create a presentation of 10 to 12 slides, including comprehensive speaker notes to recommend your selected model (Nurse to Patient Ratio staffing model) to nursing leadership and the following information:

1. A description of the staffing model chosen (Nurse to Patient Ratio staffing model) for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

2. A description of the quality metrics and other data that was used to determine the most appropriate staffing model.

3. A description of the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

4. A plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

Include three to five *peer-reviewed* references in your presentation, including the textbook. 

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment.

Rubric

Description of the Staffing Model assessment

Description of the Staffing Model

13.5 points

Criteria Description

Description of the Staffing Model

5. Excellent

13.5 points

The presentation comprehensively describes the appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

4. Good

12.42 points

The presentation skillfully describes the appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

3. Satisfactory

11.88 points

The presentation does not clearly describe the appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

10.8 points

The presentation clearly describes the appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not adequately describe the appropriate staffing model for a 30-bed skilled nursing facility or acute inpatient unit.

collapse Quality Metrics and Data assessment

Quality Metrics and Data

13.5 points

Criteria Description

Quality Metrics and Data

5. Excellent

13.5 points

The presentation thoroughly and thoughtfully describes the quality metrics and data used to determine the most appropriate model.

4. Good

12.42 points

The presentation thoroughly describes the quality metrics and data used to determine the most appropriate model.

3. Satisfactory

11.88 points

The presentation clearly describes the quality metrics and data used to determine the most appropriate model.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

10.8 points

The presentation does not clearly describe the quality metrics and data used to determine the most appropriate model.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not adequately describe the quality metrics and data used to determine the most appropriate model.

collapse Budgetary Implications assessment

Budgetary Implications

13.5 points

Criteria Description

Budgetary Implications

5. Excellent

13.5 points

The presentation expertly and substantially describes the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

4. Good

12.42 points

The presentation thoroughly describes the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

3. Satisfactory

11.88 points

The presentation clearly describes the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

10.8 points

The presentation does not clearly describe the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not adequately describe the budgetary implications of implementing the staffing model.

collapse Monitoring assessment

Monitoring

13.5 points

Criteria Description

Monitoring

5. Excellent

13.5 points

The presentation comprehensively and substantially describes a plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

4. Good

12.42 points

The presentation comprehensively describes a plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

3. Satisfactory

11.88 points

The presentation clearly describes a plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

10.8 points

The presentation does not clearly describe a plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not adequately describe a plan for continuous monitoring to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen staffing model.

collapse Presentation of Content assessment

Presentation of Content

9 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

9 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

8.28 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

7.92 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7.2 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

collapse Layout assessment

Layout

9 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

9 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

8.28 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

3. Satisfactory

7.92 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7.2 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

collapse Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) assessment

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

9 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

9 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

8.28 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

7.92 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7.2 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

4.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.14 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

3.96 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.14 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.96 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.6 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.