Differentiating for Diverse Students Chart

profileMaria4523
Week6Rubric.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-480 ELM-480-O500 Differentiating for Diverse Students 30.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (65.00%) Approaching (75.00%) Acceptable (85.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Carmen, Kindergarten 15.0% Not addressed. Selected text is inappropriate for the student or rationale does not justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is irrelevant to the text and ineffectively rationalized. Selected text is sufficient for the student and rationale attempts to justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is simple and broadly rationalized. Selected text is appropriate for the student and rationale logically justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is relevant to the text and credibly rationalized. Selected text is creative for the student and rationale compellingly justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is well-crafted for the student and skillfully rationalized.
Eduardo, 2nd Grade 15.0% Not addressed. Selected text is inappropriate for the student or rationale does not justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is irrelevant to the text and ineffectively rationalized. Selected text is sufficient for the student and rationale attempts to justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is simple and broadly rationalized. Selected text is appropriate for the student and rationale logically justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is relevant to the text and credibly rationalized. Selected text is creative for the student and rationale compellingly justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is well-crafted for the student and skillfully rationalized.
Jade, 4th Grade 15.0% Not addressed. Selected text is inappropriate for the student or rationale does not justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is irrelevant to the text and ineffectively rationalized. Selected text is sufficient for the student and rationale attempts to justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is simple and broadly rationalized. Selected text is appropriate for the student and rationale logically justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is relevant to the text and credibly rationalized. Selected text is creative for the student and rationale compellingly justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is well-crafted for the student and skillfully rationalized.
Ines, 7th Grade 15.0% Not addressed. Selected text is inappropriate for the student or rationale does not justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is irrelevant to the text and ineffectively rationalized. Selected text is sufficient for the student and rationale attempts to justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is simple and broadly rationalized. Selected text is appropriate for the student and rationale logically justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is relevant to the text and credibly rationalized. Selected text is creative for the student and rationale compellingly justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is well-crafted for the student and skillfully rationalized.
Kent, 8th Grade 15.0% Not addressed. Selected text is inappropriate for the student or rationale does not justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is irrelevant to the text and ineffectively rationalized. Selected text is sufficient for the student and rationale attempts to justify the selection. ELA strategy or activity is simple and broadly rationalized. Selected text is appropriate for the student and rationale logically justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is relevant to the text and credibly rationalized. Selected text is creative for the student and rationale compellingly justifies the selection. ELA strategy or activity is well-crafted for the student and skillfully rationalized.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 15.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several formatting errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%