WEEK 6 PPT

profiledadsfav96
WEEK6ASSIGNMENT.docx
Home>Nursing homework help>WEEK 6 PPT

You will use project management tools and strategies to propose how you would support and potentially implement a nursing informatics project. While you may not have the opportunity to implement this proposed project, this project will allow you to apply the skills needed and the considerations that are required in deducing how a project of this scope might take place in your nursing practice. To complete this project, you will define a informatics project that would be beneficial to your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You can discuss this with upper leadership, in your practice or organization, explaining that you will need to design ia proposed informatics project.

REQUIRED RESOURCES:

· Devi, D. H., Duraisamy, K., Armghan, A., Alsharari, M., Aliqab, K., Sorathiya, V., Das, S., & Rashid, N. (2023).  5G technology in healthcare and wearable devices: A reviewLinks to an external site..  Sensors (14248220) ,  23 (5), 2519. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052519

· Lavallee, Lori. (2023).  The Importance of a communication plan in project managementLinks to an external site. . Southern New Hampshire University. https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/business/communication-plan-in-project-management

· Raza, M. M., Venkatesh, K. P., & Kvedar, J. C. (2023).  Promoting racial equity in Digital Health: Applying a cross-disciplinary equity frameworkLinks to an external site.. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00747-5 

· Yang, X., Wang, X., Li, X., Gu, D., Liang, C., Li, K., Zhang, G., & Zhong, J. (2020).  Exploring emerging IoT technologies in smart health research: A knowledge graph analysisLinks to an external site..  BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20 , 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01278-9

· Wu, M., & Luo, J. (2019).  Wearable technology applications in healthcare: A literature review  Links to an external site. . HIMSS.  https://www.himss.org/resources/wearable-technology-applications-healthcare-literature-reviewLinks to an external site.

· Sipes, C. (2024).  Table 4.4. Responsibility matrix: RACI-EBP V Download Table 4.4. Responsibility matrix: RACI-EBP V [Table]. In Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse, (3rd ed., p. 112). Springer Publishing Company. 

· Credit Line: Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse, 3rd Edition by Sipes, C. Copyright 2024 by Springer Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of PUBLISHER via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2025.

· Sipes, C. (2024).  Table 4.5. Sample: Risk analysis document and plan Download Table 4.5. Sample: Risk analysis document and plan [Table]. In Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse, (3rd ed., p. 114). Springer Publishing Company. 

· Credit Line: Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse, 3rd Edition by Sipes, C. Copyright 2024 by Springer Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of PUBLISHER via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2025

· Document:   Sample Presentation Template (PowerPoint)

THE ASSIGNMENT: (10–11 SLIDES)

This week, you will finalize your proposed Informatics Project, using all work completed during Weeks 1–5. Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your presentation (APA 7).  

· Introduction

· Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents. Develop the Scope and Charter Documents.

· Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. You can use a Word document and insert a table. Directions can be viewed in the Week 3 media piece,  How to Perform a SWOT Analysis, found in this week’s Learning Resources. Some of the content is relevant to both the project for this course as well as organization of your doctoral dissertation. Overall, the first step for any project, work or your dissertation, requires a plan: what you will and will not do.

· Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. After watching the Week 3 media piece,  How to do a GAP Analysis, identify the gap and analyze the flow or lack of flow of information as the gap in a process. The visual map will include the flow from the point of origin to the destination.

· Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) using PowerPoint slides or another method. Be sure to review the media piece,  What Is a Work Breakdown Structure? in the Week 3 Learning Resources. 

· Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start/finish activities. Be sure to review the  Gantt Charts, Simplified media piece in this week’s Learning Resources.  

· Lavallee, L. (2023).  The importance of a communication plan in project management Links to an external site. . https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/business/communication-plan-in-project-management

· RACI (responsibility chart) which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working with a team. 

· Communication plan – Include documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps, especially if others will be responsible for helping you acquire documents such as IRB site documents if applicable. 

· Examples can be found in the Learning Resources, Required Readings.

· Risk management plan– After viewing the “ Risk Analysis How to Analyze Risks on Your Project” media piece in this week's Learning Resources, document current and potential risks and how risks may be mitigated if possible.  

· Summarize the key findings from your review of the scholarly evidence that supports the proposed project. Include key take aways (one slide). Include valid scholarly references (no older than 7 years) to support your work on the proposed project.

· Conclusion 

Reminder: The Sample Presentation  Template is found in Week 6 Learning Resources. All presentations submitted must use this formatting.

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.

RUBRIC:

NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentA clear and comprehensive introduction is provided.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodIntroduction of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairIntroduction of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide an Introduction.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter documents and provide the Scope and Charter documents. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. Accurate and complete project scope and charter documents that are detailed and comprehensive are provided with the submission.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. Accurate project scope and charter documents are provided with the submission.

19 to >15.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. Inaccurate or vague project scope and charter documents are provided with the submission.

15 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred, or it is missing Inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project Scope and Charter documents are provided with the submission, or are missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConduct a SWOT analysis and include it in your presentation. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete SWOT analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

17 to >15.0 ptsGoodAn accurate SWOT analysis is provided with the submission.

15 to >12.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague SWOT analysis is provided with the submission.

12 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete SWOT analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete Gap Analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided in the submission. The response accurately and clearly indicates in detail the flow from the point of origin to the destination and fully supports the proposed small nursing informatics project.

17 to >15.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. The response accurately indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and supports the proposed small nursing informatics project.

15 to >12.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and may inaccurately or vaguely support the proposed small nursing informatics project.

12 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Gap Analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination that does not support the proposed small nursing informatics projects, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate, complete, and detailed Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Project Timeline Gantt Chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start/finish activities. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete Project Timeline Gantt chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. The response accurately and clearly identifies in detail who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn accurate Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. The response accurately identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

19 to >15.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

15 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a RACI (Responsibility Chart), which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working on a team. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete responsibility chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. The responsibility chart accurately and clearly outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate responsibility chart is provided with the submission. The responsibility chart accurately outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague responsibility chart is provided with the submission. The responsibility chart inaccurately or vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete responsibility chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. The responsibility chart inaccurately and vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, or it is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Communication Plan, including documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete communication plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

17 to >15.0 ptsGoodAn accurate communication plan is provided with the submission.

15 to >12.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague communication plan is provided with the submission.

12 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague communication plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a Risk Management Plan. Before inserting any table or figure into your presentation, include a brief description that explains your content (APA 7th edition).

15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and complete risk management plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

12 to >9.0 ptsGoodAn accurate risk management plan provided with the submission.

9 to >6.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague risk management plan is provided with the submission.

6 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete risk management plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the key findings from your review of the scholarly evidence that supports the proposed project. Include key take aways (one slide). Include valid scholarly references (no older than 7 years) to support your work on the proposed project.

20 to >16.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and comprehensive summary of current scholarly evidence that supports the rationale for the proposed project. Current and valid scholarly references are provided.

16 to >12.0 ptsGoodAn accurate summary of scholarly evidence that supports the rationale for the proposed project. Current and valid scholarly references are provided.

12 to >7.0 ptsFairAn inaccurate or vague summary of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission. Most scholarly references are current and valid.

7 to >0 ptsPoorAn inaccurate and vague, or incomplete review of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission, or it is missing. References are inaccurate or missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentA clear and comprehensive conclusion is provided.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodConclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairConclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a Conclusion.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Slides make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Text, bulleted lists, and visuals are carefully focused—neither overly detailed nor lacking substance. Slides are concise while incorporating all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive introduction and conclusion are provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorSlides follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No introduction or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Standard Academic English: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The presentation follows the required template and correct APA format for title slide, headings, fonts, spacing, margins, and numbering. In-text citations and reference slides are properly formatted. Uses the Walden template from learning resources.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format and writing template with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Uses writing template.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Uses writing template.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors or does not use writing template.

5 pts

Total Points: 200