COM2006 Week 5 Project

COM2006 Week 5 Project Rubric Course: COM2006-Interpersonal Communication SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Described the

relationship

situation from

each person’s

point of view

/ 50Student did not

submit

assignment

Work does not

meet assignment

expectations;

shows little or no

understanding of

assignment

concepts

Assignment

partially meets

expectations

with minimal

depth;

demonstrates a

limited

understanding of

the assignment

concepts

Assignment

meets

expectations

with all

components

being addressed;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate and

apply key

assignments

concepts

Assignment

exceeds

expectations

with exceptional

depth; presents

all requirements

of the

assignment;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate, apply

and synthesize

key assignment

concepts

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Discussed the

relationship’s

stage and how

this stage has

affected the

relationship

situation

/ 50Student did not

submit

assignment

Work does not

meet assignment

expectations;

shows little or no

understanding of

assignment

concepts

Assignment

partially meets

expectations

with minimal

depth;

demonstrates a

limited

understanding of

the assignment

concepts.

Assignment

meets

expectations

with all

components

being addressed;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate and

apply key

assignments

concepts

Assignment

exceeds

expectations

with exceptional

depth; presents

all requirements

of the

assignment;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate, apply

and synthesize

key assignment

concepts

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Chose two to

four

interpersonal

communicatio

n theories that

can be applied

to this

situation and

discussed the

research

foundation for

each theory

/ 50Student did not

submit

assignment

Work does not

meet assignment

expectations;

shows little or no

understanding of

assignment

concepts

Assignment

partially meets

expectations

with minimal

depth;

demonstrates a

limited

understanding of

the assignment

concepts

Assignment

meets

expectations

with all

components

being addressed;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate and

apply key

assignments

concepts

Assignment

exceeds

expectations

with exceptional

depth; presents

all requirements

of the

assignment;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate, apply

and synthesize

key assignment

concepts

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Discussed how

each of these

theories is

applicable for

managing the

situation more

effectively

/ 50Student did not

submit

assignment

Work does not

meet assignment

expectations;

shows little or no

understanding of

assignment

concepts

Assignment

partially meets

expectations

with minimal

depth;

demonstrates a

limited

understanding of

the assignment

concepts

Assignment

meets

expectations

with all

components

being addressed;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate and

apply key

assignments

concepts

Assignment

exceeds

expectations

with exceptional

depth; presents

all requirements

of the

assignment;

demonstrates

the ability to

evaluate, apply

and synthesize

key assignment

concepts

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

Wrote in a

clear, concise,

and organized

manner;

demonstrated

ethical

scholarship in

/ 50Student did not

submit

assignment

Numerous issues

in any of the

following:

grammar,

mechanics,

spelling, use of

slang, and

Some spelling,

grammatical,

and/or structural

errors. Some

errors in APA

formatting

(citations and

Minor errors in

grammar,

mechanics, or

spelling in the

initial posting.

Minor errors in

APA formatting

Minor to no

errors in

grammar,

mechanics, or

spelling in both

the initial post

and comments to

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (30-35) 30 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (35-40) 40 points

Proficient (B Range) (40-45) 45 points

Exemplary (A Range) (45-50) 50 points

Criterion Score

the accurate

representation

and attribution

of sources (i.e.,

APA format);

displayed

accurate

spelling,

grammar, and

professional

vocabulary.

incomplete or

missing APA

citations and

references. If

required for the

assignment, did

not use course,

text, and/or

outside readings

(where relevant)

to support work.

references). If

required for the

assignment,

utilizes sources

to support work

for initial post

but not

comments to

other students.

Sources include

course/text

readings but

outside sources

(when relevant)

include non-

academic/authori

tative, such as

Wikis and .com

resources.

(citations and

references). If

required for the

assignment,

utilizes sources

to support work

for both the

initial post and

some of the

comments to

other students.

Sources include

course and text

readings as well

as outside

sources (when

relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative

(e.g., journal

articles, other

text books, .gov

web sites,

professional

organization web

sites).

others. APA

formatting is

correct. If

required for the

assignment,

utilizes sources

to support work

for both the

initial post and

the comments to

other students.

Sources include

course and text

readings as well

as outside

sources (when

relevant) that are

academic and

authoritative

(e.g., journal

articles, other

text books, .gov

web sites,

professional

organization web

sites).

Total / 250

Overall Score

No Submission 0 points minimum

No Submissions 150 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 200 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 225 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 250 points minimum