BUS4101 Week 5 Project

BUS4101 Week 5 Project Rubric Course: BUS4101-Quality Management SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (39-45) 45 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (46-51) 51 points

Proficient (B Range) (52-58) 58 points

Exemplary (A Range) (59-65) 65 points

Criterion Score

Constructed a

House of

Quality.

/ 65Did not identify a

House of Quality

in any way.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified a

House of Quality

generally, but did

not construct

one for the

company

selected.

Lacked credible

research support.

Constructed

portion of a

House of Quality,

but left other

elements

incomplete.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Constructed a

House of Quality.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Constructed a

fully formed

House of Quality,

with all relevant

matrices

completed.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Developed

SPC checklists

for each

dimension of

the product

subject to

statistical

control.

/ 40Did not identify

any SPC

checklists.

Unsupported

with research.

Outlined SPC

checklists that

did not appear to

be related to the

product under

consideration.

Lacked credible

research support.

Developed SPC

checklists for

some dimensions

of the product,

but failed to

construct them

for other

dimensions that

would obviously

be subject to

statistical

control.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Developed SPC

checklists for

each dimension

of the product

subject to

statistical

control.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Developed SPC

checklists that

demonstrate

insight into the

processes being

managed.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Evaluated the

product using

the Kaizen

five-step plan.

/ 40Did not identify

Kaizen.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified Kaizen.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

Kaizen.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Evaluated the

product using

the Kaizen five-

step plan.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Insightfully

evaluated the

Kaizen five-step

plan for the

process that

produces the

product.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32-36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Determined

what

characteristics

and activities

would be

subject to

benchmarking

and proposed

organizations

against which

such

benchmarking

could be done.

/ 40Did not identify

characteristics

and activities

that are subject

to benchmarking.

Unsupported

with research.

Identified

characteristics

and activities.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described

characteristics

and activities.

Weakly

supported with

research.

Determined

what

characteristics

and activities

would be subject

to benchmarking,

and proposed

organizations

against which to

benchmark.

Sufficiently

supported with

research.

Offered

compelling

determination as

to why the

activities

selected for

benchmarking

were chosen,

including world

class leaders

against whom

benchmarking

could take place.

Well supported

by research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Communicatio

n: Use of tone,

word choice,

audience,

transitions,

and

progression of

ideas.

/ 10Submission

contained no

discernible

overall intent in

author’s

selection of

ideas.

Submission

contained

random

presentation of

ideas, which

prevented

understanding

the majority of

author’s overall

intent.

Ideas presented

in a way that

forced the reader

to make repeated

inferences in

order to identify

and follow the

author’s overall

intent.

The reader could

follow the

author’s overall

intent as stated.

The writer’s

overall argument

and language

were clear and

tightly focused,

leaving the

reader with no

room for

confusion about

author’s intent.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9-10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Mechanics:

Use of

grammar,

sentence

structure, and

spelling.

/ 10Errors in basic

writing

conventions

were sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension.

Errors in basic

writing

conventions

were sufficiently

numerous to

prevent reader

comprehension

of majority of the

work.

Errors in basic

writing

conventions

interfered with,

but did not

prevent, reader

comprehension.

The reader

noticed a few

errors in basic

writing

conventions but

these few errors

did not interfere

with reader

comprehension.

Test was

basically error

free, so that a

reader would

have to

purposely search

to find any errors

that may be

present.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Academic/APA

/PPT

Formatting

Use of

citations,

references, and

structural

formatting

including such

elements as

title page,

running head,

page numbers,

headings, title

slides,

graphics, data,

notes section,

(as

appropriate),

introduction,

and conclusio

/ 20No attempt at

Academic/APA/P

PT formatting in

presentation.

Academic/APA/P

PT format

attempted, but

errors were

significant,

preventing

comprehension

of message.

Academic/APA/P

PT format

attempted but

errors were

distracting.

Used

Academic/APA/P

PT format

accurately. Errors

noticeable but

minor.

Used

Academic/APA/P

PT format

proficiently.

Work basically

error free.

Total / 225

Overall Score

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range) 157 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 179 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 202 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 225 points minimum