Week5HomeworkAssignment.docx
Name:
In this assignment, you must answer the “Answer Implying Guilty,” and the “Answer Implying Not Guilty” questions. Both responses must start by stating either “Yes” or “No” for each charge and a brief summary that explains why. One example of the first question was provided.
IMPORTANT: ALL IMPLYING GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS “NO” RESPONSES AND ALL IMPLYING NOT GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS ‘YES’ RESPONSES.
|
|
Question
|
Answer Implying
Guilty
|
Answer Implying
Not Guilty
|
|
|
EXAMPLE:
Could other DLP traders have manipulated GEDS’s transaction systems like Kerviel did?
|
No, the methods employed by Kerviel were so intricate that no one else could have replicated them.
|
Yes, Kerviel did not have to customize the systems in any way in order to conceal his unauthorized and fictitious trades.
|
|
1
|
Could other DLP traders have manipulated GEDS’s transaction systems like Kerviel did?
|
|
|
|
2
|
Was it typical for middle office employees to be promoted to the front office?
|
|
|
|
3
|
When Kerviel worked in the middle office, did he show any unusual aptitude for manipulating the transaction systems?
|
|
|
|
4
|
Did DLP have any rules or disincentives designed to deter traders like Kerviel from undertaking unauthorized trading?
|
|
|
|
5
|
Why did Kerviel make such huge bets when he did not derive any personal benefit from the profits?
|
|
|
Rak1993
