Katherine Becks
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability – Week 5
Week 5: Constructed Response to Campus Improvement Scenario
National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) Standards
Standard 1: Mission, Vision, and Improvement
Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to collaboratively lead, design, and implement a school mission, vision, and process for continuous improvement that reflects a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.
Component 1.2: Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to lead improvement processes that include data use, design, implementation, and evaluation.
Educational Leadership Skills
· Evaluate existing improvement processes
· Use research and data to develop an improvement process that includes the following components: diagnosis, design, implementation, and evaluation
· Develop an implementation plan to support the improvement process
Standard 3: Equity, Inclusiveness, and Cultural Responsiveness
Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.
Component 3.1: Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to use data to evaluate, design, cultivate, and advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture.
Educational Leadership Skills
· Evaluate school culture
· Use research and data to design and cultivate a supportive, nurturing, and inclusive school culture
· Develop strategies for improving school culture
· Advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture
Component 3.2: Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate, and advocate for equitable access to educational resources, technologies, and opportunities that support the educational success and well-being of each student.
Educational Leadership Skills
· Evaluate sources of inequality and bias in the allocation of educational resources and opportunities
· Cultivate the equitable use of educational resources and opportunities through procedures, guidelines, norms, and values
· Advocate for the equitable access to educational resources, procedures, and opportunities
Component 3.3: Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, advocate, and cultivate equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavioral support practices among teachers and staff.
Educational Leadership Skills
· Evaluate root causes of inequity and bias
· Develop school policies or procedures that cultivate equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive practice among teachers and staff
· Support the use of differentiated, content-based instructional materials and strategies
· Advocate for equitable practice among teachers and staff
Principal Standards Pillar
School Vision and Culture
Principal Domain and Competency
Domain I: School Culture
Competency 1
· Creates a positive, collaborative, and collegial campus culture that sets high expectations and facilitates the implementation and achievement of campus initiatives and goals.
· Creates an atmosphere of safety that encourages the social, emotional, and physical well-being of staff and students
Domain V: Strategic Operations
Competency 9
· Assesses the current needs of the campus analyzes a wide set of evidence to determine campus objectives, and sets measurable school goals, targets, and strategies that form the school’s strategic plans
· Creates a positive, collaborative, and equitable culture that establishes and communicates high, consistent expectations for all stakeholders and addresses barriers to ensure achievement of campus initiatives and goals
Knowledge/Skills/Mindsets (KSMs)
Knowledge: factors that should inform campus initiatives and goals; components of a measurable goal; definition of equity and equality; process of creating a vision, mission, goals, priorities;
Skills: creates/communicates a clear, compelling mission, vision, and set of values; establish and inspire commitment from others towards the campus goals in alignment with the mission and vision; respond to breaches in culture effectively; model organizational values
Mindsets: effective teaching is the cornerstone of a strong school vision and mission – there should be a low tolerance for ineffective teaching; high expectations for all teachers strengthens a school’s instructional culture; positive adult relationships are the foundation for student academic growth; in order to thrive, students’ basic needs must be met; all students come to school with unique histories, values, and strengths, routine feedback is an integral part of building a positive school culture.
Principal Standards Pillar
Diversity and Equity
Principal Domain and Competency
Domain VI: Ethics, Equity, and Diversity
Competency 11
· Advocates for all children by promoting the continuous and appropriate development of all learners in the campus community.
· Implements strategies to ensure that all students have access to effective educators and continuous opportunities to learn.
· Promotes awareness and appreciation of diversity throughout the campus community.
· Facilitates the use of sound, research-based practice in the development, implementation, coordination, and evaluation of campus curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular programs to fulfill academic, development, social, and cultural needs.
Knowledge/Skills/Mindsets (KSMs)
Knowledge: Cultural self-awareness, student cultures, staff cultures, culturally responsive teaching best practices
Skills: Share focus of bringing equitable practices to the school, analyze and recognize/address and correct instances that represent misalignment of cultural competence and inequity, lead conversations about inequities and about honoring diversity
Mindsets: accept and respect all cultural backgrounds, customs, traditions, values, and communications as assets; equity is a school-wide belief, attainable goal, and daily practice
Course-level Objectives (CLOs):
CLO1: Analyze multiple forms of data to determine implications for improving student performance.
CLO2: Demonstrate root cause analysis.
CLO3: Apply campus improvement planning processes.
CLO5: Construct strategies for an inclusive, equitable school culture focused on student achievement.
Week 5 Learning Objectives (W5LOs):
W5LO1: Analyze multiple campus data sets: academic and survey data. (CLO1)
W5LO2: Identify correlational disparities across multiple campus data sets: academic and survey data. (CLO1)
W5LO3: Formulate possible root cause(s) for identified disparities implicated in multiple campus data sets: academic and survey data. (CLO2)
W5LO4: Evaluate a Campus Improvement Plan for significant disparities identified from multiple campus data sets: academic and survey data. (CLO3, CLO5)
W5LO5: Propose actions and strategies for a Campus Improvement Plan to address disparities identified from multiple campus data sets: academic and survey data. (CLO3, CLO5)
Resources:
Campus Improvement Scenario with Constructed Response Question
Required readings for weeks 1 – 5
Additional/Supplemental videos and readings for weeks 1 – 5
Lectures from weeks 1 – 5
Week 5 Assignment Rubric:
Use the Rubric to guide your writing.
Note: APA citations are required for referencing published and public sources.
|
EDLD 5333 Week 5 Tasks |
Level 1 Does Not Meet Minimum Criteria |
Level 2 Approaches Minimum Criteria |
Level 3 Meets Criteria |
Level 4 Exceeds Criteria |
|
NELP Components 1.2, 3.1. 3.2, 3.3
SBEC Competencies 1, 8, 9, 11
(W5LO1, W5LO2 / CLO1) (W5LO3 / CLO2) (W5LO4 / CLO3, CLO5) (W5LO5 / CLO3, CLO5)
|
Candidate provides no response. OR Candidate provides fails to respond to most parts of the question and/or demonstrates little or no understanding of the overall situation. |
Candidate provides a partial response to all parts of the question with limited demonstrated understanding of the overall situation.
|
Candidate provides a general response to all parts of the question with demonstrated general understanding of the overall situation.
|
Candidate provides a comprehensive response to all parts of the question with demonstrated depth of understanding of the overall situation.
|
|
|
Candidate provides no response. OR Candidate provides inappropriate and/or ineffective actions in response to the area of need. |
Candidate provides partially accurate and appropriate actions that are based on some misconceptions in response to the area of need. |
Candidate provides general, actions that are mostly appropriate and effective in response to the area of need. |
Candidate provides detailed, prioritized actions that are appropriate and effective in response to the area of need. |
|
|
Candidate provides no response. OR Candidate identifies weak or ineffective leadership strategies that contain serious misconceptions of the given situation. |
Candidate identifies limited or inappropriate leadership strategies that contain misconceptions of the given situation. |
Candidate identifies generally appropriate leadership strategies that may contain minor errors for the given situation. |
Candidate identifies detailed and specific leadership strategies that are highly effective for the given situation. |
|
|
Candidate provides no response. OR Candidate provides little or no explanation/rationale for actions and strategies to address the area of need, or explanation/rationale contains serious misconceptions. |
Candidate provides a simplistic explanation/rationale for actions and strategies to address the area of need. |
Candidate provides general explanation/rationale for actions and strategies to address the area of need. |
Candidate provides specific, detailed and insightful explanation/rationale for actions and strategies to address the area of need. |
|
|
Candidate provides no response. OR Candidate provides little, no, or inappropriate evidence from data and information provided in the scenario, and serious misconceptions are apparent. |
Candidate provides limited and/or vague reference to evidence from data and information provided in the scenario, which may indicate misconceptions. |
Candidate generally refers to evidence from data and information provided in the scenario. |
Candidate cites specific and convincing evidence from data and information provided in the scenario. |
|
|
Candidate shows misalignment between responses and each part of the question. |
Candidate shows partial alignment between responses and each part of the question. |
Candidate shows general alignment between responses and each part of the question. |
Candidate shows complete alignment between responses and each part of the question. |
Reference:
Texas Education Agency Principal as Instructional Leader Certification Training for Education
Preparation Programs. Austin.
Review:
In week 4, you demonstrated your learning and skills acquisition in leadership for accountability in a culminating assignment. This week, you will apply these same skills in response to the scenario that accompanies this assignment. The content and format of this week’s assignment is purposefully designed in the same manner as the constructed response questions on the Texas Principal as Instructional Leader certification exam: TExES 268.
Constructed Response to Campus Improvement Scenario
(W5LO1, W5LO2 / CLO1), (W5LO3 / CLO2), (W5LO4 / CLO3, CLO5), (W5LO5 / CLO3, CLO5)
Directions: Read the Campus Improvement Scenario with Constructed Response Questions document carefully. Follow the directions for the constructed response provided in the scenario document. Provide your response in the textbox below. Use the rubric to guide your response.
· Use all data and information provided with the scenario.
· Address all aspects of the question (A, B, C).
· Identify a significant need and/or barrier.
· Address role that culture has in effecting campus improvements.
· Include specific, detailed leadership strategies.
· Use evidence from the data and information provided to support your response.
Type your constructed response below. (minimum 500 words)
Cite all appropriate sources and data analyses to support your statements.
|
|
Lamar University Summer 1 – 2019
1 of 6