12 page power point due 12/4, goes with last assign
1
Running head: Title
TITLE 2
Week 5 - Final Project
Final Project
The Final Project should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research and the application of new knowledge. It should utilize previous skills developed in foundational health care courses and apply them within the context and viewpoint of a health care administrator and their role in managing health and human services.
For the Final Project, conduct scholarly and professional research while integrating the course’s learning outcomes to address a selected topic:
· Analyze ethical and legal concepts, including specific federal regulations, required of health care organizations to ensure the delivery of high quality health care that protects patient safety.
Research Requirements
Academic research and papers must meet certain standards of quality that are recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality academic research?
· The use of primary (original), credible sources written by experts in the field of study.
· Ensuring secondary sources are supported by research in primary sources.
· Making sure all research is relevant and that material used is pertinent to the area of study.
· In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required.
· Keep in mind that educational websites may be appropriate, in some cases, but should be evaluated carefully.
The Library offers many excellent databases and other resources to assist you in conducting scholarly research.
What sources are not acceptable for academic research and referencing?
· Encyclopedias
· Dictionaries
· Wikipedia, other wikis, or blogs
· Websites and other sources that do not provide quality researched materials (e.g., they do not use credible sources to support the information in the document).
All research must reflect professional academic protocol and must be documented according to APA standards.
Creating the Final Project
I. Introduction
Describe the issue. Include why it was selected, the perspective of your approach to the issue, and the scope of the paper or presentation. In essence, describe in this area what is being covered. Be specific and to the point. This is an important part of the project as it engages the reader and sets the scope of the research.
II. Statement of the Issue to be Investigated
Describe why the topic is a relevant problem or issue. It is important to provide literature sources in support of the importance of the need/issue/topic. For example, if you are interested in researching the issue of nutrition in early childhood brain development among American children – cite literature identifying the scope of the problem (for example: the number of malnourished children, the implications of malnourishment on learning and brain development; and long term implications). Overall, this section should detail what makes this topic or issue so important that you are spending time and energy researching it. What is the impact of the problem if nothing is done to correct the situation?
III. Research Sources
This section documents the relevant research reflecting the topic of the Final Project. In this section, paraphrased narratives of the actual research studies are reported and should represent the current research related to the topic area. In general, your research should:
a. Identify your chosen topic and what has happened in the specific research of the topic (describe the study, sample, findings, important points from the discussion in the research article, and any variables that may influence the findings of the research).
b. Discuss any key elements of the topic that may be instructional, legal, ethical, social, et (what is projected if nothing is done? what has been tried?). Support this section with relevant resource citations.
c. Provide an analysis of the research articles used, including: explaining what was done in the study, what the target population was, information about who did the research (the author), what was found with the study, and any implications of the findings to your topic or issue.
IV. Conclusion
In this section, provide a general, but thorough summary reviewing: why the topic was selected; the problem or issue briefly stated; the approach that was used; findings; and solutions. In this section, the reader or audience should have a good idea of what the researcher did and what was found.
V. References
The references should be listed on a new page or slide and must be formatted according to APA requirements. You must use a minimum of six to eight scholarly sources.
VI. Creating a Good PowerPoint Presentation
Create your Final Project as if you were going to present it to the Board of Directors (BOD) of your organization. Therefore, it is very important not to overload your slides as you do not want your audience to feel as if it has to read the entire project. Your PowerPoint slides should be created with summarized bullet points on each slide, and the bulk of what you will be discussing about each bullet should be provided in APA format Notes Section under each slide. Please ensure to follow APA, avoid first person, proof read your work prior to submitting it.
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Introduction
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Exceptionally clear and focused description of the issue, why it was selected, the perspective of approach and the scope of the presentation.
Proficient - Describes the issue, why it was selected, the perspective of approach and the scope of the presentation. Some relevant information is missing.
Basic - Minimally describes the issue, why it was selected, the perspective of approach and the scope of the presentation. Some of the above components are unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the issue, why it was selected, the perspective of approach and the scope of the presentation; however the overall direction of the paper is unclear.
Non-Performance - The introduction is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Issue to be Investigated
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and comprehensively describes the relevance and importance of topic/issue to be investigated. Provides exceptional literature sources to support the importance of the issue/topic.
Proficient - Describes the relevance and importance of topic/issue to be investigated. Provides literature sources to support the importance of the issue/topic. Some details may be missing.
Basic - Somewhat describes the relevance and importance of topic/issue to be investigated. Provides limited literature sources to support the importance of the issue/topic. Some details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the relevance and importance of topic/issue to be investigated, but it is unclear. May not provide limited literature sources to support the importance of the issue/topic. Many details are missing.
Non-Performance - The issue is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Research Sources
Total: 6.50
Distinguished - Provides paraphrased narratives of the research studies that support the topic/issue being investigated. Thoroughly analyzes research studies regarding methodology and implications of the findings.
Proficient - Provides paraphrased narratives of the research studies that support the topic/issue being investigated. Analyzes research studies regarding methodology and implications of the findings. Some information may be missing.
Basic - Provides paraphrased narratives of the research studies that support the topic/issue being investigated. May not analyze research studies regarding methodology and implications of the findings and/or there are inaccuracies.
Below Expectations - Attempts to paraphrase and analyze the research studies. Information is incomplete and/ or inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The research sources are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion
Total: 5.00
Distinguished - Provides a clear summary of the problem/issue, the methodology, findings, and possible solutions.
Proficient - Provides a summary of the problem/issue, the methodology, findings, and possible solutions. Some information may be missing.
Basic - Provides a minimal summary of the problem/issue, the methodology, findings, and possible solutions. Many details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a summary of the problem/issue, the methodology, findings, and possible solutions. It is incomplete and/or not clear.
Non-Performance - The conclusion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Integrative Learning: Connections to Discipline
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Autonomously synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Proficient - Autonomously correlates examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Basic - Attempts to correlate examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Below Expectations - Displays inconsistent examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.
Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.70
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Slide Requirement
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - The length of the presentation is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted slides.
Proficient - The length of the presentation is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted slides.
Basic - The length of the presentation is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted slides.
Below Expectations - The length of the presentation is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted slides.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.