|
NR512 W5 (175 pts.)
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Introduction
|
|
20 pts
Introduction presents a brief overview all parts of the paper.
|
18 pts
Introduction presents one of the two required elements.
|
16 pts
Introduction does not include either of the two required elements.
|
14 pts
Minimal attempt at introduction.
|
0 pts
No introduction is present.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic
|
|
30 pts
Successfully selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic
|
26 pts
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic
|
24 pts
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic
|
11 pts
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides no rationale for selecting topic
|
0 pts
Does not complete assignment
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConvincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner citing pros and cons
|
|
40 pts
Provides convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented.
|
36 pts
Some arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented, but are not convincing in nature.
|
32 pts
Minimal arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented.
|
0 pts
No discussion of positive or negative impact presented
|
|
40 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment
|
|
30 pts
Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment is presented
|
26 pts
Some discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment.
|
24 pts
Minimal discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used presented
|
0 pts
No discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
|
20 pts
Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. Recommendations for the future are provided
|
18 pts
Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. Includes some recommendations for future related to topic.
|
16 pts
Concluding statements are present but do not address insights and/or includes minimal recommendations for future related to topic
|
14 pts
Minimal concluding statements present but no insight or recommendations for future are presented.
|
0 pts
No conclusion.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
|
|
20 pts
0–1 APA format errors in text, title, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.
|
18 pts
2-3 APA format errors in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.
|
16 pts
4-6 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.
|
14 pts
7-9 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format
|
0 pts
10 or more APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
|
|
8 pts
0–1 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited correctly. There are a minimum of three scholarly, current (5 years or less) references.
|
7 pts
2-3 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
6 pts
4-6 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
4 pts
7-9 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
0 pts
10 or more errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited
|
|
8 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
|
|
7 pts
0–3 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
6 pts
4–5 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
5 pts
6-7 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
3 pts
8-9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
0 pts
10 or more errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing.
|
|
7 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
|
|
0 pts
0 pts lost - submission met deadline
|
0 pts
student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)
|
|
0 pts
|
|
|
bol
Week5Ajrubric1.docx
0
